dark light

Rodolfo

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 901 through 915 (of 1,190 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: The PAK-FA Saga Episode V #2466701
    Rodolfo
    Participant

    But S-500 class radars will be BM specialized radars. Against aerial targets S-400 will be the bechmark.

    in reply to: Russian Navy News & Discussion Thread #2069001
    Rodolfo
    Participant

    – please do some research before posting. Last time I checked, SOSUS was not operated by the USN anymore. Guess why
    – for those who know more, I’d suggest to remember that the Sovs/Russians have their own SOSUSes. Guess where and why. That should answer the question about the “bastion” strategy and the need for Russian SSBNs to sail towards the Antlantic
    – for those really interested in matters acoustic, please remember that “radiating noise” is not a term used in real submarine acoustics as such. A given type of sub might be ultra-quiet at, say, 6 knots and pure heavy metal at 12 before becoming relatively quiet at 15. Do I have to say why? Subs (especially SSBNs) have pre-designed optimum depth and speed parameters that they tend to stick to for some reason.
    – another difference between Russian and US acoustic detection techniques is the emphasis the Soviet/Russians have put (nolens volens) on “non-traditional” detection methods (“keelwater” detection, non-acoustic detection, low and ultra-low frequency detection – which was the Achilles heel of USN boats till the Seawolf class). There is a reason why the Russians I know from the “Deep North” complain about the Seawolf and not really about the LA boats.
    – another point: those who think that the current Borei-class boat (Y. Dolgoruki) and the Yasen have been laid down decades ago are mistaken. “Laid down” means (in case of the Borei) that there were two semi-assembled hull sections at the yard till 2003: Real construction has started in 2003 only, based on totally new design specs. With the Sev., it’s even better: the design changed several times, and the boat that will hit the water (if ever) has nothing to do anymore with the original design. I even think it will be a totally new class of boats, and Yakhont/Onyx is out as a main armament.

    Please RSM55, explain more to ignorant people on the subject like me. I am extremely interested in all subjects.

    PD: Mi guess to issue one is … “because SOSUS can’t deal with vessels like Akula anymore”

    in reply to: Russian Navy News & Discussion Thread #2069042
    Rodolfo
    Participant

    http://en.rian.ru/russia/20080929/117259758.html

    Austin, no Chakra, after all? 😡

    in reply to: Somali Pirates vs USN and Russian Navy! #2069050
    Rodolfo
    Participant

    This sound like a Salgari’s story on the XXI Century. 😀

    in reply to: Russian Space & Missile[ News/Discussion] Part-3 #1785267
    Rodolfo
    Participant

    Why not something more akin to the kinds of relationships we have with Western Europe, rather than wanting to be confrontational or hostile. That’s much better for business.

    Why not? Off-course USA must fulfil certain preconditions in order to assure Russian national interest. Otherwise, let USA outspend herself. :rolleyes:

    in reply to: Russian Space & Missile[ News/Discussion] Part-3 #1785270
    Rodolfo
    Participant

    It’s still cheaper to become an ally than go that route. The USA isn’t gonna invade Russia, or launch a nuclear attack, so they’d be better off investing that money in their economy.

    Yeap, I think USA to become a junior partner of Russia will save a lot of dollars of the American taxpayer. In the other hand, budget surplus are so high in Russia that any controlled increase of the defence budget will in no way hurt her economy.

    in reply to: Russian Navy News & Discussion Thread #2069491
    Rodolfo
    Participant

    Austin, the article seems to be an answer to the rumours commented on the Podvig’s blog.

    in reply to: Russian Navy News & Discussion Thread #2069494
    Rodolfo
    Participant

    Medvedev visits Russian Pacific Fleet’s submarine base

    http://en.rian.ru/photolents/20080925/117090986.html

    in reply to: Russian Navy News & Discussion Thread #2069629
    Rodolfo
    Participant

    Now someone convince the Russians to stop being asinine and let Veliky make a port call in New York City so I can go get some pictures More seriously and to the point, will Russia turn Venezuela into the new Cuba? With all of these major exercises, one has to wonder if basing agreements aren’t in the back of Russia’s mind.

    Well, I hope our Venezuelan fellows to provide some pics of the “Peter the Great” as they did with the pair of Tu-160. 😀 Also I expect many other forum-participants to share my hope. 😮

    Rodolfo
    Participant

    Upgraded MiG-31 may be a match for 5th generation fighters in terms of detection power, data management and so on, but is not designed to deal with 5th generation fighters. That’s the hard reality. It is very specifically suited for patrolling large depopulated areas (name it North-east of Russia) and deflect attacks from bombers and cruise missiles. May be it can deal with B-2s but, against F-22,… no way. Also I think to scrap Foxhound, as here proposed, is a WRONG decision. It is very useful for the Russian geography because of speed and range. This is not related with planes generations. This is just related to the country size.

    in reply to: Russian Space & Missile[ News/Discussion] Part-3 #1785347
    Rodolfo
    Participant

    I think is pointless to try to develop a nation-wide ABM system for a country as Russia (add also Belarus and with a conditioned likelihood Kazakhstan and Ukraine). The most practical way to gain some sort of protection is a point-defence on Moscow, some SSBN bases and silo bases. Otherwise it seems to me as a waste of resources. I mean S-500 or S-500 on steroids in such a sites and nothing more. Just an opinion.

    in reply to: Russian Space & Missile[ News/Discussion] Part-3 #1785359
    Rodolfo
    Participant

    The article seems to be a sort of lobby for an ABM system. However, S-500 supposedly is now in the design boards. May be funds are not enough.

    in reply to: The Military Situation in Georgia, S.O. and Abkhazia Part II #2474164
    Rodolfo
    Participant

    Detailed analysis on the Barvanov’s site

    http://mdb.cast.ru/mdb/3-2008/

    in reply to: Interesting bits on missile defense in this week's AvWeek. #1785393
    Rodolfo
    Participant

    1. Apparently the range of PAC-3 is more like 40-60km rather than the 20kms that’s been given practically since day 1. (The longer range could be because against an air-breather the PAC-3 can fly a semi-ballistic “shaped trajectory”. )

    2. PAC-3 MSE’s motor, in addition to being larger than the basic PAC-3’s also is a two-pulse motor for better end game performace.

    3. AvWeek states that one PAC-3 MSE fits in the same space as a four-pack PAC-3. LM has always stated that it would fit in the same canister as the current PAC-3 which is why the MSE has folding wings and fins.

    Hardly surprising news considering that the Russian counterparts (9M96 & 9M96M) of PAC-3 have 40 and 120 km reach respectively. The new ranges seem to be more logical.

    in reply to: BLACKJACKs In Venezuela #2476607
    Rodolfo
    Participant

    Mr Hugo confirmed the news. Two Blackjacks are in Caracas now.

Viewing 15 posts - 901 through 915 (of 1,190 total)