https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fairchild_Camera_and_Instrument
In addition to producing aircraft, Fairchild also made cameras, so it is entirely possible that it is from a camera fitted to another aircraft type.
Post deleted.
VH-EPN c/n 28 is still registered in Australia.
https://fnqskies.blogspot.com.au/
The link above suggests that there have been some engine runs recently.
They were then sent for analysis in British Fiji, where Dr David Winn Hoodless took measurements before the bones were lost.
I am no scientist, but I find it somewhat incredible that Dr Jantz is stupid enough to attach his name to this “discovery”. Not only did the “facts” come via a party with a vested interest, they are measurements only, not actual bones. He runs the risk of bringing ridicule upon himself and the University of Tennessee.
Thinking it is a 172, and early 172 too.
Not an early 172.
The first omni-vision 172’s were introduced in 1964 (172E), but the earlier models (from the 172C onwards IIRC) had a swept tail. That is not a Bird Dog tail (they had a rounded fin), nor is it from a U-17 (Cessna 185).
Looks like a backyard creation to me.
Also the Lycoming engines are not ex-Bird dogs, as the Bird dog was fitted with a Continental O-470 engine. The engines look (at a brief glance) like VO-435’s, so are probably out of a helicopter.
So, anyone with news of VH-JCG?
Still under restoration by John and Chris Gallagher (and hence the rego) who have 4 Fairchild projects in their collection.
Not sure if it is related, however I heard that this machine recently changed hands. [ATTACH=CONFIG]238081[/ATTACH]
Reevers has started a search for an approved FAA and CASA CFL who can endorse several pilots… with negotiations commenced.
I understand that the Brisbane pilot who was endorsed on the A-26 by the Canadians has regained his medical. The solution may be close to home.
Actually it is 5,000 full-time equivalent jobs (so inevitably more than 5,000 people, as quite a few are employed part-time), and 50 aircraft to be retired or deferred (including 15 B767’s and 9 B744’s, plus 8 A380’s deferred indefinitely).
Not good news, but sadly predictable. Failure to adapt to changing trends (the swing to B777’s for example) and customer needs.
Compare that to Air New Zealand who today announced a record profit (retired their B744’s in favour of B777’s) and offer an excellent product.
A sad indictment of Qantas management failings.
Well I recently had the pleasure of travelling in the All Blacks B777, and was in business class, and all I can say is it was FANTASTIC!
I’ve traveled in business on Qantas, United, Singapore etc, and they pale in comparison to the Air New Zealand product.
They certainly got it right this time!
I saw VH-EOB at Mackay about 2 months ago, and I can tell you it won’t be flying again anytime soon, if ever, sadly.
Pussies. Try landing on a short sloping strip 7,000 feet above sea level (where the thin air robs performance) and dodging tropical weather on the way.
These guys know what they are doing – http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gYY9s8KKDDs
I may be a little out of date, but recall that Branson sold a controlling interest (something like 48% IIRC) in VA to Singapore Airlines some years ago.
It would be interesting to see the outcome of mixing the 2 cultures, as AA are at the very low end of the market, whereas VA are at the opposite end. 🙂