@Loke,
I wouldn’t be to sure about the payload capacity growth! The Su-27 started with a payload of 4000 kg, while newer variants carry up to 8000 kg. The JAS 39A had a payload of only 4200 kg, whereas the JAS 39E has a payload of 7200 kg. There are several other examples where newer variants can carry twice the load of the baseline version, the MiG-29 is another good example for this!

@Quadbike,
whether you call it cueing or sighting system doesn’t matter. The difference is between display unit and a simple cueing/sighting device. The DASH and JHMCS should be more or less equal, though I have to admit that I don’t have any specific info on the DASH. Pure laziness as I guess the most basic stuff is available on the net.

@Kramer,
I agree with you. Performance is often restricted on combat aircraft these days even after they are indcuted into service. The Typhoon for example wasn’t cleared for the full 9 g envelope before block 5 (2007) or about 4 years after the first aircraft were delivered to the customers. If the Tejas would ultimately fail to achieve its design load factor after development and testing is complete, then people can complain and state it failed to meet that requirement. But it will certainly take another few years before that’s the case.

But once again as I asked before, are the dimensions of Tejas known yet and is there any good website with more comprehensive information about the programme and the aircraft itself? Preferably in english of course?

And the MiG-29…

Are you question the engines or the UB training capabilities?
Here is the Su-30MK2 which is an export version.

I question the engines. Every Su-30 variant can be configured for training with coupled controls. And neither of your sources confirm the AL-41F1S. Btw. the export variant existed before the domestic Su-30M2. And given the designation etc. I tend to believe that this aircraft will be largely identical to the Su-30MK2, perhaps with AL-31F-M1 engines and some stuff found on the Su-27SM, which isn’t available for export. Something I have said from the very beginning when the announcement was made >1 year ago.

The four new ordered Su-30M2(KnAAPO) comes with 117S engnes-14.500kgf.
The four Su-30M2 is sort of an Su-35UB’s
They come with full mission suite avionics and Full dual station trainer functions.

Any source for that?

What is particularly interesting is that only 88 radars are ordered, while 112 aircraft are to be built as part of T3A.

That the T3A would use the Captor-M is clear since the summer announcement of Captor-E being slated for ~2015.

Su-30MK2 stands for modernised export variant 2. The letter K removed leaves M2 and as KnAAPO only built those Su-30MKK/MK2 variants it would offer some synergy effects. A new variant might be to expensive and it has to be taken into account that the SM upgrade was based on the MKK/MK2 technologies. The stock UB is manufactured by IAPO not KnAAPO.