If that is the case, Radpoe, consider me educated! I assumed, given that Benny Lynch (a man with cojones of steel, IMO) was being chucked out of one in 1946, that the Meteor was one of the first aircraft to be regularly fitted with bang-seats – if MB had proved the concept etc etc etc. I obviously assumed wrongly.
On the other hand, with a little thought, can you imagine the chances of anyone going through the NF11 canopy in an emergency? It’d be like a chip-cutter. At what point in the proceedings did explosive removal / rupturing of the canopy appear, I wonder?
Adrian
😎 😎 😎 😎 😎 😎 :diablo:
With that many smileys, we’re talking Phil, not Ollie!
Adrian
Wonder if they ever tried winch launching the Me321 ?:eek:
Piece of cake! You got 300 troops ready to use the one behind – give ’em the bungee and shout “Russians!”. It’ll be off the ground in no time. Then, when they realise they’ve been had, cram them into their glider and you repeat the same performance until there’s only one left on the ground. That’s when you need the Zwilling!
Adrian
I think Martin Baker might object to the suggestion that you couldn’t eject from a Meteor!
Bailing out from the early pre-bang seat meatboxes may have been a different thing altogether, and would certainly have given an impetus to developing a safer system. I can’t comment on what happened to Rocketeer’s CO-in-law, but I suspect that Ross may have the key – or it may have been outside the seats envelope?
Adrian
Not made any less interesting by it being of a Zwilling towing two Gotha Go242 gliders…
Adrian
(OK, it’s so far away that almost anything could be happening, but that’s my best guess. Next best guess would be being followed by two Fw189s. Vampires – I doubt veerrrrry much.)
Presumably it is a very long museum?
The Zwilling may seem a bit hair-brained, but IIRC the original plan was to tow behind three Bf110s. This was all very well if all worked, but (again, IIRC) an engine failure on an early takeoff led to one aircraft being dragged into the other two, with disastrous results.
I still wouldn’t have liked to have been in one anywhere near the enemy, though…
Adrian
Yes, I like the last one too – nice juxtaposition! The P51 is appropriate too, given the place’s history. Sadly the next time I will be down that way will be for a funeral, so I’m unlikely to get a chance to look in. 🙁
Adrian
Revell used to do a 1/72 kit, which looked pretty damn cool hanging from the bedroom ceiling (well, I thought so!).
I can’t help feeling, though, that it probably had the turning circle of a battleship – any attempt to fly it anywhere you didn’t have complete air superiority would be likely to be short-lived…
Adrian
Surely never a …. Canberra display team?:diablo:
Adrian
I think we might all be missing something here – the note by the pin says “Lavendon Airfield 1916-1920”.
An airfield of that period, in my limited experience, would have very few fixed amenities, and much of it would be canvas. Runways would have been grass – remember, all sorts of aircraft operated off grass right into and beyond WW2 – and probably quite short.
I can walk you over the site of the one “permanent” building on Port Meadow, (bar the concrete target, which is hundreds of yards from the flying area) and you wouldn’t know it had ever been there. Similarly, the WW1 airfield near Bangor, Gwynedd, is utterly invisible now. Unless, like Rendcombe, you had a few huts surviving, I doubt you’d find much trace at all on the ground. If it existed, It’s not really any wonder at all that it’s hard to find traces of it.
Adrian
Is there such a thing as Quantum Mechanics or are they Quantum Physics?:confused:
Blowed if I know. Which pretty much sums up my point about French prototypes!
Adrian
Was the Merlin really used on French prototypes? News to me, though I’ll admit my knowledge of French prototypes is rivalled only by my knowledge of Quantum Mechanics!
Adrian
bbc.co.uk/leicester have video of the take off on their web-site
Thank you, MSW, for that link! It’s fun in soooooo many ways – especially the “WhereTF…” moment when she flies out of sight. She’s amazingly sprightly – I guess she’s flying at a tiny fraction of her active all-up weight. ETA – like the way you link via a Lancaster pic – nice touch! She’s also on the scrolling news “ticker” on the BBC News homepage, and is “most emailed” too.
After all the manure that’s been flung from all sides and at all sides, let’s drink to XH558 and everyone who’s made it possible.
It’s eleven years since I went to a big display – after four hours in a baking DX car park after one of the Spitfire “dos” it took me until 2005 at OW to go to any airshow. Looks like 2008 is the year, then!
I believe it is forum tradition at moments like this to ask…
… Will it be at Legends?
(I’ll get me coat).
Adrian
😀
The BBC have now found out about it. Whether this means they’ll have cameras there, of course, is a different matter.
Adrian
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/leicestershire/7049694.stm
There are many data plates on a Spitfire.
Could you rebuild a Spitfire from each data plate?
I’ll get me coat…
Adrian