dark light

topspeed

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 526 through 540 (of 2,657 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Specific impulse of military missile !? #2148160
    topspeed
    Participant

    465 seconds is the highest on a real deal going to LEO and GEO at the moment.

    in reply to: U-2: why no imitators? #2148442
    topspeed
    Participant

    Yes and no… The Canberra had a service ceiling of only about 48000ft. Not up there with the U2

    However the RB57 version of the Canberra with its huge wing was some 65000ft.

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]248030[/ATTACH]

    Solar aircraft Helios flew 30000 ft higher than U-2.
    47 km altitude was without passengers on my ship…fairly hard to take down.100 Passengers would take it to only 60 000 ft.

    in reply to: U-2: why no imitators? #2148676
    topspeed
    Participant

    I counted this could fly at 47 km altitude. The real thing…not this 1/300 scale model. This is a solar electric aerodyne…flies with solar alone at the speed of 490 km/h and 1040 km/h with batteries.
    Intented to be a 100 seater passenger airliner. Powered with 8 x 260 kW Siemens electric engines.
    14 x more power on solar than in Solar Impulse II with the newest film thin cells.

    in reply to: General Discussion #263517
    topspeed
    Participant

    Here this would fly 490 km/h on solar alone and 1040 km/h at high with batteries.

    Well not this 1/300 model, but the real thing.

    Boeing engineer was amazed about this recently.

    Very stable flyer I may add.

    in reply to: General Discussion #265411
    topspeed
    Participant

    If you pedal the plane with 100 passengers along with solar power the top speed will reach 517 km/h at ideal conditions. 140 passengers will reach 440 km/h.

    I deleted several posts to make this thread easier to read.

    in reply to: General Discussion #265460
    topspeed
    Participant

    Sorry to disappoint you again.

    I am only able to predict 490 km/h topspeed for a pure solar powered 100 seater airliner with legal measures.

    Good thing is the craft can have two 30 seater restaurants on board…luxury only ocean liners and Zeppelin ( LZ-129 ) can provide.

    in reply to: General Discussion #266342
    topspeed
    Participant

    To market this lifting fuselage idea I will build ” the world smallest ” aeroplane with half the stall speed of the record holder from 1954. Why people 62 years ago were so creative in creating new aeroplanes ?

    in reply to: General Discussion #266443
    topspeed
    Participant

    Yes Frank…solar/electric/muscle powered hybrid cannot be a real passenger plane anytime soon.

    But it is fun to play around with…as it is 100% ecolological..healthy and much faster than a regular jet.

    Newest NASA tested film thin space solar panels are 33% efficient….it means 451 watts per one sq meter at high at noon. Twice the power needed to pedal an aeroplane 100 km (as did DAEDALUS ).

    in reply to: General Discussion #268043
    topspeed
    Participant

    http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.459.9447&rep=rep1&type=pdf

    That is the Liebeck 2004 BWB study.

    BTW: The Proof of Concept or the Minimum Viable Product is now 1900 mm x 4200 mm…hence the world smallest aeroplane…with double the wing area of the prevailing smallest and 48 km/h stall speed.

    in reply to: General Discussion #268143
    topspeed
    Participant

    -deleted by the author-

    in reply to: General Discussion #270781
    topspeed
    Participant

    -deleted by the author-

    in reply to: General Discussion #271816
    topspeed
    Participant

    -deleted by the author-

    in reply to: General Discussion #272093
    topspeed
    Participant

    -deleted by the author-

    in reply to: General Discussion #272385
    topspeed
    Participant

    -deleted by the author-

    in reply to: USAF T-X #2201777
    topspeed
    Participant
Viewing 15 posts - 526 through 540 (of 2,657 total)