This may be true, but fact is that Finland was completely broke, and could not afford even almost free airplanes. Also, the view of Soviets had to be taken into account, situation in Finland was really dangerous, there was still a possibility of Soviet occupation. Added to this, the Allied forces (read: Soviets) had grounded Finnish Air Force, all flights required a special permission. After the end of the war there was no more any intention of series production of Pyörremyrsky. The test flights were made more out of curiosity to see how the airplane that had been painstakingly designed and built would actually perform.

Yes finns collected marriage rings to get money for arms. Me-109s were never paid ( Germany also never paid for burned Lappland etc )…and also the bounty P-36s were paid to Germany. Brewsters were very expensive for the finns.

It wasn’t an impossible task to build a wooden fighter with wartime glues – the British did the Mosquito, the Germans used wood on a number of types, the Russians made almost all their fighters out of wood, the Japanese were increasing their use of wood. It wasn’t desirable, but it worked.

However, there seems little evidence that the Pyorremyrsky would actually have matched Bf109G performance overall. A smooth shape may have given it a good top speed but the heavier weight of a wooden structure would have meant inferior climb, ceiling, acceleration and agility. It could only have entered service in significant numbers after the Bf109 was approaching obsolescence: some would argue that it already had done so by late 1943. An interesting design study for the industry, yes, a realistic hope for the air force, no.

Generally not a problem but Finland was pretty small country and remote. They had to use substitute glues which were really miserable.

Myrsky is being renovated nicely. Which was also a VL aeroplane.

https://asiakas.kotisivukone.com/files/vlmyrsky.kotisivukone.com/tiedostot/vl_myrsky_ii_entisonti_pitka_versio_2013-11-21.pdf