dark light

topspeed

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1,336 through 1,350 (of 2,657 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Did you know…flying in Mars is possible ? #384437
    topspeed
    Participant

    Disappointed, looking forward to a Martin Mars!

    So you don’t think it cool to fly to Mars…and in Mars ? :highly_amused:

    in reply to: Did you know…flying in Mars is possible ? #384442
    topspeed
    Participant

    There is also a car design ( here for Europa mission ).

    in reply to: New Sensation ? #487087
    topspeed
    Participant

    current status

    And in 50 minutes from Heathrow to Los Angeles…since the scramjet can be ignited at the end of the rail….after some time on the rockets.

    :highly_amused:

    in reply to: New Sensation ? #487333
    topspeed
    Participant

    Now a week later the project loos like this.

    No funding for sure.

    I figure this could “fly” to Mars with just 1/10th of the Apollo mission cost.

    in reply to: New Sensation ? #487583
    topspeed
    Participant

    Reality check here may be needed.

    Corcorde trip NY-Paris-NY was already way back 10 000 usd….so if we take the passengers also to 60 km altitude to feel weightlesness too for a while…maybe 30 – 40 000 £ ticket is closer to the truth.

    https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20080704145008AAGT9g6

    in reply to: The flying car has arrived! #384915
    topspeed
    Participant

    I has all the controls of a small aircraft and when you land, just drive it right off the airport landing pad to the house! It is called the Terrafugia. Comes equipped with everything a normal car has such as steering wheel, turning signals, gas petal and breaks.

    The flying car is a very complicated task to do. They apper to look ugly as cars and nasty fly or inefficient as an aeroplane.

    in reply to: Pusher prop…the way of the future ? #487745
    topspeed
    Participant
    in reply to: The flying car has arrived! #385190
    topspeed
    Participant
    in reply to: Pusher prop…the way of the future ? #487959
    topspeed
    Participant

    You might be interested reading that interview with Ric Parker: Director of research and technology, Rolls Royce:

    http://www.theengineer.co.uk/in-depth/interviews/ric-parker-director-of-research-and-technology-rolls-royce/1019368.article

    There is an interesting part regarding new pusher prop engines being (re)envisioned for large airliners

    Very nice reading !

    There is also a firm named QinetiQ in the UK that has done outstanding work with solar powered remote controlled models.

    Electric engines have one major advantage over jets and pistons….they produce less drag as they don’t breath air….and second….they can be placed where ever you want….since they are very lite in weight.

    Here is the NASA Helios from 2004..it is the most remarkable aviation happening ( or phenomena even ) in the 21st centurys first decade; http://www.nasa.gov/centers/dryden/pdf/163836main_Helios_05_02.pdf

    in reply to: Pusher prop…the way of the future ? #487966
    topspeed
    Participant

    The noise is an issue at low level not altitude. Airport tend to be built on the ground and aircraft landing are usually pretty low…hence the nuisance.

    I understand this but solar powered aerodynes seem to fly very slow at low and thus make no noise whatsoever. :highly_amused:

    in reply to: Pusher prop…the way of the future ? #487977
    topspeed
    Participant

    Its not a case of propeller aircraft being concieved as loud but in this case the fact that pusher props make an annoying noise…somtimes loud noises can be pleasant . Its not a volume issue although that tend to be more noisey than tractor props.

    If you have nine meter dia props they don’t even have to turn very fast to reach the speed of sound…and at high where Baumgarter and Eustace broke the speed of sound without an aeroplane there won’t be much of the sound either the air is so thin.

    Pic from here; http://mesoslaunch.blogspot.fi/

    in reply to: Pusher prop…the way of the future ? #488003
    topspeed
    Participant

    Think of propellers and you might immediately conjure images of Indiana Jones, World War II flying aces and creaky crop dusters. Propeller-driven craft are often perceived as loud.

    I predict a solar powered propeller plane will brake the speed of sound in level flight right about in the altitude on 40 km ( 132 000 ft ) in 10-20 years.

    It has to be aerodynamically refined and big..very large and combo of the newest 40+ % efficient panels and 20+ % efficient panels that are now in the lab.

    I have actually counted it is possible.

    in reply to: The flying car has arrived! #385194
    topspeed
    Participant

    How is that going to handle the usual sleeping policemen (speed humps) and pot holes found in the UK?

    This is obvious…it flies over them. It is a flying car…get it ? :applause:

    I like their approch….cool site and all the bells and whistles..unlike my space flite site; http://mesoslaunch.blogspot.com

    in reply to: Pusher prop…the way of the future ? #488194
    topspeed
    Participant

    I am not possessed with the noise issue…but as for now I am with these; http://evworld.com/article.cfm?storyid=220

    It says Helios went 170 mph ( Mach 0.25 ) at 98 000 ft using 24 kW…and it is a solar powered craft ( 930 kg / 300 kg payload ).

    How fast could they go if you have 2335 m2 and thus 1030 kW max out put ( at high altitude round about noon ) with todays solar panels ?

    I estimate 500 km/h with pusher props at really high !

    —-

    John Stringfellow was a pusher type plane fore runner; http://www.ctie.monash.edu.au/hargrave/stringfellow.html

    in reply to: Pusher prop…the way of the future ? #488209
    topspeed
    Participant

    The unducted fan seemed to have fail due to the very high noise levels. There was a MD-80 and a Boeing 727 with one fitted…the MD-90 was originally going to be the -80 series with UDF.

    The UDF was louder than the remaining jet engines. The UDF BN Islander was soon converted to conventional engines.

    There was the Optica and that buzzed around like an angry bee

    LZ129 also had pusher props.

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]232604[/ATTACH]

    Discussion; https://uk.answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20110605122812AAYKi7G

    Also the FLYER !

    http://www.wright-brothers.org/Information_Desk/Just_the_Facts/Airplanes/Wright_Airplane_images/1905_Flyer_III/Rear%20Overview.JPG

Viewing 15 posts - 1,336 through 1,350 (of 2,657 total)