…Flight B17, letting the Fort draw ahead then pouring on the coals and doing a big barrel roll with the Fort at it’s axis! If true, what a great showoff stunt! 😮 Adrian
Back in the mid 1960s at Yeovilton, which was used as a V bomber (Vulcan) dispersal airfield, there was the story of a Sea Vixen pilot who allowed a visiting Vulcan start his take off run and the Vixen, having done power checks on the taxi-way, rolled out directly onto the runway and hared off after the Vulcan.
As the Vulcan lifted off the already airborne Vixen with undercarriage retracted carried out a victory roll around the Vulcan as they both climbed out, then the Vixen pointed to the sky and climbed quickly away.
ISTR that the Vixen pilot was Eagles and that the Vulcan pilot refused to return until assured that Eagle’s Vixen was back on the deck.
I recall an incident where an airliner lined up on a taxiway.
Moggy
One of our Phantoms diverted ashore to Roosevelt Roads with rocket hang ups and the pilot mistook an apron for a runway and landed thereon.:D
I remember ’cause I was the one flown in by Sea King to replace port gas turbine starter. Worked a 31 hr day that time.
Broken piston from a Clerget rotary engine, used by my grandfather as an ashtray. About the same time – the Brabazon flying overhead – pointed out by a thrilled father who was in the industry.
The Albacore was recovered by the Navy and bits went into the FAAMs example. The Ben Macdui Wellington was also recovered but the bits are now scattered throughout the UK. Probably one of the biggest recovery disasters in this country. 😡
Best wishes
Steve P
I often wonder which Wellington it was and the circ’s of its crash. I have ben following the lists of WW2 in Air-Britain’s journals but have not as yet come across that one.
…(RNAS?) Condor …
Pedant mode on, but seeing as I spent a few years there whilst it was still an air station I think I am qualified, entitled even to correct.
It would have been HMS Condor, RNAS Arbroath – aka Aberbrothock.
All naval air stations were known as RNAS {geographic place name} and HMS {a bird type name}.
Whilst up at Condor I spent many a period out in the highlands, from those near Arbroath such as Glen Clova, Glen Esk, Braemar and Glen Quoich to further afield in the Cairngorms, Glen Coe (fell down the north saddle of the Buachaille Etive More – but that as they say is another story) and Nevis with a treck from Dalwhinnie down Loch Erich, stopping overnight at Ben Alder Cottage (hovel in reality) and then north and then west to Glen Nevis, camping near Thunderclap Bridge.
In Glen Clova was the remains of an Albacore and whilst at Glen Esk a days walk around the area taking in Ben Macdhui found a crashed Wellington. I carried the leading edge of the fin for miles but with the snowstorm turning into a blizzard survival dictated that I shed it.
The highlands are fair littered with aircraft wrecks.
I once had an old (Kodak Retina ??, i think) camera
Yes, there was a range of Retina Reflex series cameras including folding models IIc and IIIc with coupled range finders.
For an interesting trip down memory lane, or into history for younger folk, Ivor Matanle’s ‘Collecting and Using Classic SLRs’ is a most rewarding book. You will find some info on Retinas in there.
I always found the SRT101 with its CLC meter very reliable when used with a little nouse. As with any camera mounted meter the trick was to point the camera slightly down to get a reading and set at that. Then adjust by adding or subtracting 1/2 – 1 stop according to sun position if bright. On overcast days there were few issues. I founf Kodachrome II on dull days accentuated the reds something amazing, which could depend on lens in use. This down to red and blue being in sharp focus at different points and thus reds could spread a little.
In 1968 it was really something to have such a reliable meter in the camera and with an auto (stop-down as shutter is pressed) diaphragm lens with a bayonet-fit. This was about as good as it got. Unlike Nikons of the day there was no need to reset the meter as a lens was changed.
Metering, auto-diaphragm and rapid lens changing were the reasons I went for the SRT101 (also it felt good and solid in the hand – today picking one up sans lens one cannot but be impressed by its weight). Canons of the day had not settled into a homogenous design. Pentax had that slow change 42mm thread lens mount and were lightly constructed.
Focusing using a fresnel screen became more difficult as my eyes aged and a split focusing would have helped which to be fair was available in some Minolta X700s.
I recall trying out an uncle’s Edixa Prismat with pre-set lenses. An innovation on that was an accessory which cable connected the shutter button to the lens allowing the lens to be stopped down quickly, but it was a clumsy arrangement.
In my opion, global warmin is not man-made. It is a natual proces, like a bigger version of our yearly seasons.
That is a statement founded upon considerable ignorance.
I will not expand at length here, for it is somewhat off topic, however I will inform you that I have been debating this issue for over a decade now and am aware of most of the disinformation and myths that have been spread by those with interests in fossil fuel and related industries. As more scientific data accumulates then the more certain is it that the biggest contributions to current climate change are of human origin.
For more information visit:
http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/research/hadleycentre/index.html
and also have a look at this timely new book by Tim Flannery:
The Weather Makers : How Man Is Changing the Climate and What It Means for Life on Earth
which can be found at:
I have just picked up a paper back edition in the UK and it is very good indeed.
If you can still hold to your stated opinion after consulting the above sources I would be very surprised.
I do not intend to debate this further on this thread.
Who cares about the enviroment, i much rather get to A-B as quickly as possible.
I for one care about the environment.
Thinking such as yours is irresponsible and rather selfish.
What is the point of getting from A to B quicker when either are suffering from pollution, freak weather (you will likely get more of that in transit as the climate change shifts up a gear or two) or underwater?
Your reasoning is faulty, as others have pointed out, on technical issues. You have much to learn if you wish to become a pilot.
The wingtip devices do not add any lateral stability. the B737 was laterally stable before, and these rather fragile extension (only one or two odd meters behind the center og gravity) don’t do nothing. Google for “winglet” and check what it is all about.
I would suspect that the devices you mention are to prevent lateral flow of air to the wing-tips causing a break down in airflow and loss of lift as higher pressure air below attempts to join the low pressure air above. One result of such are the wing tip vortices seen as vapour trails.
However, for publicity purposes, the Navy wanted the top man in charge to have the credit and so they gave it entirely to Carmichael.
Sorry but I don’t buy that.:(
Look how fugly it looks when you have a truly free cargo compartment with wing box over the fuselage.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Shorts_SC.7_Skyvan.jpg
That is a good example. Note the position and structure of the undercarriage. Main load bearing at a junction with the fuselage in line with where the wing box will be above, thus allowing a frame structure integral with the spar at wing root for load distribution. Also the strut, probably also attached to the wing spar at its outboard-upper end, provides the classic trianglular and thus mechanical stable structure. The main spar of course looks as if it is above the roof line.
…the Graham Thomas book on the subject…
That would be ‘Furies and Fireflies Over Korea’ one of the most error ridden misleading, poorly written and disapointing books that I have read, especially as I had waited another year past the originally expected publication date.
The account of Carmichael’s Mig shoot down is on page 90 on which it is clear that another Mig was hit by fire from a number of aircraft in Carmichael’s flight before the latter’s ecounter with the Mig that was downed by him.
Thomas, for a one time MOD Focus chief reporter demonstrates a woeful lack of knowledge about aircraft controls, who does what WRT maintenance on air arm squadrons amongst other deficiencies in this particular narrative. The map provided is also woefully inadequate.
If the wing tips is lower than the wing root, the wing is dihedral.
I beg to differ what you describe is anhedral, but you are correct about high wings and or dihedral increasing stability.
As you say, it must have made life interesting for those on the flight-deck trying to do their “day jobs” and stay on their feet in the face of a constant 40Kt gale 😮
Heh! Heh! Much more fun at night and in the wet stuff, freezing or otherwise and trying to keep clear of prop’s, intakes and exhausts.
With that latter I recall an incident on Vic’ where I was burned by the exhaust of port engine of a Sea Vixen whilst, as ‘plane captain’, on walk around removing blanks, U/C locks etc (normal practice was to duck under port tail boom and then past the pen-nib fairing so it was at very close range) when the aircraft on which it was my job to signal pilot to start port engine but an orficer intervened – not his place to do so.
I proceded removing starboard U/C lock and climbed up onto starboard wing to remove wing jury strut. This was attached to the outer wing through a lug screwed into the wing with the strut end having a mating fork end on a screw thread with a locking collar. I had my left thumb pressing against the pip-pin, connecting fork to lug, sensing when the pressure came off to ease the pin as I turned the locking collar.
Things were well under control when the same orficer, unnoticed by myself, had climbed up on the mainplane via the starboard flap shroud, removed the large hex Alan key (used for drop tank caps) and proceeded to whack the split pin with it. Of course it met my thumb first. So now I had a sore face and a throbbing thumb.
My Sea Vixen was at the front of Fly 2, immediately aft of the starboard JBD (jet blast deflector) and I had been aware of the Bucc’ being ranged on the starboard cat’ and had judged I would be finished and back on the deck before it went to full power for launch.
But with this orficer’s intervention, unnecessary, I was still up there as the Bucc’ went to full power. The jet efflux was directed up the JBD directly onto the Vixen’s folded starboard wing leading edge, the aircraft being ranged in Fly 2 en-echelon, which neatly deflected it straight at myself.
There followed an interesting couple of minutes where, as I held on to the still in place jury strut, the hot avcat fumes further agravated my sore face, my goggles stretched away on their elastic straps and my tool pouch webbing belt slowly slipped through the buckle.
Fortunately the jury strut saved me from further injury.
There was a sequel to this when the following day during the early morning details this same orficer came unstuck when he tried to intervene again. But that, as the say, is another story.
Hope you don’t mind me sharing that with you.
Inability to change or display aperture does indicate it wasn’t communicating with the lens, unmounting and remounting often fixes that sort of issue.
One of my 1D2s was playing up at Biggin, with button presses being ignored. It had got very hot lying on the ground in the sun, and after a few minutes in the shade it was back to normal…
This is an area where I often wonder about today’s all singng all dancing SLR, whether digital or film.
As long as I can get film I will hang on to my old SRT101s which now have a far better range of lenses available for use than when I was on Ark in the early 70’s. Bought one camera body plus standard Rokkor f1.7 lens and a Tamron 135mm in UK before embarking and another SRT101 with standard f1.4 Rokkor in Gib’ plus a 28mm Rokkor wide angle on our way out of the Med at the end of 70. Added a 300mm Tamron whilst in the Caribbean.
No worries if the batteries went flat, if the light was tricky I would use my trusty Weston Master V, which I still have along with its invercone and brown leathger pouches.:D
Considering the conditions that these cameras were used over time the fact that they still work speaks for them.
Such a shame that the digital era has heralded increasing obsolescence.