dark light

Indian1973

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1,621 through 1,635 (of 1,845 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Next Generation Trainers #2690105
    Indian1973
    Participant

    can someone explain the need for the stealth design on the MAKO ?

    in reply to: Is the Great Britain a thing of the past? #2690233
    Indian1973
    Participant

    heres something that might be of interest….

    http://www.financialexpress.com/fe_full_story.php?content_id=52365

    National Security Index Ranks China 2, India 8

    OUR ECONOMIC BUREAU

    NEW DELHI, FEB 10: India ranks 8, with the United States on top and China at second position in a newly constructed National Security Index (NSI) put out by India’s National Security Council Secretariat (NSCS). Pakistan ranks 49 in a list of 50 countries.

    The NSI has been estimated for the NSCS by Professor Satish Kumar of the Jawaharlal Nehru University and has been published in India’s National Security Annual Review, 2003, to be released this week.

    The NSI is a composite index based on five different indices of development and national power. These are the Defence Index (DI), the Gross Domestic Product Index (GDPI), the Human Development Index (HDI), the Research and Development Index (RDI) and the Population Index (PI).

    Based on the concept of “national power” developed by strategic analysts in the US and China, India’s NSI is a variant of the Chinese Comprehensive National Power (CNP) index and an American index constructed at the Rand Corporation. The Rand index measures national power on the basis of (a) national resources (technology, enterprise, human resources, financial/capital resources, physical resources); (b) national performance (infrastructure capacity, ideational resources); and

    (c) military capability (strategic resources, conversion capability and combat efficiency).

    The Chinese concept of CNP developed by scholars at the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences includes eight components, namely, natural resources, domestic economics, foreign economics, science and technology, military affairs, government capability, foreign affairs capability, and social development. India’s innovation to the concept of CNP is the population index which is not a measure of the size of population as much as it is a measure of a country’s “people power”.

    While all analysts agree that all these concepts are not quantifiable, attempts have been made to try and quantify national power in all three countries based on available and published data. Interestingly, in all three studies the United States comes on top and is followed by China at second position. The Chinese CNP index also places India in the world’s top ten powers.

    The top countries in the NSI rankings are USA, China, Japan, South Korea, Sweden, Russia, Germany, India, France and the U.K., in that order. While Israel ranks 11, Brazil is at 24, Iran at 27, Singapore 28, South Africa at 38 and Pakistan is 49 in a list of 50 countries with Angola at 50.

    Not surprisingly, in the defence capability index Pakistan ranks 6, after US, China, Russia, India and Korea, while in the R&D index it is at 43, with India ranked 27, ahead of China’s rank of 37. However, China is marginally ahead of India in the Patents index.

    The ultimate differentiator between nations remains per capita GDP, which places China way ahead of India and has taken India ahead of Pakistan in recent years. The NSI and CNP indices underscore the point that real power lies in a country’s economic, technological, scientific, political and administrative capabilities and not just in its military and defence capability.

    http://www.financialexpress.com/grfx/newspic/2004/topgun.jpg

    in reply to: Indian Air Force Pictures #2690271
    Indian1973
    Participant

    some technical details on the PTAE-7 from a 2001 report
    http://www.hindu.com/2001/01/24/stories/0224000y.htm

    its has been refined over the years given periodic tests of Lakshya.

    in reply to: Indian Air Force Pictures #2690374
    Indian1973
    Participant

    those tubes could be air inlets to keep the gun pod cool.

    in reply to: Russians sell carrier to India #2690717
    Indian1973
    Participant

    the NLCA is still on. no hints of it being dropped. we shall know for sure next year.

    I think India doesnt fully trust the future existence of Mikoyan and its suppliers , hence NLCA is seen as a good investment?

    from a newspaper report: economictimes:


    In what is being seen as another boost to the company’s endeavours to come into its own, the government, Mr Mohanty said, had already taken a decision to go in for the LCA’s naval version. “We’ve started working on its design,’’ he pointed out.

    The HAL chairman also stated that the company had prepared the project-report for the light combat helicopters. “It’ll be submitted to the government soon,’’ he quipped.

    in reply to: Pakistan's Cobras Please #2690753
    Indian1973
    Participant

    the cobra has an advantage in a much smaller frontal profile, useful if one plans to hover and shoot missiles which is its mode of ops.

    I wonder how inferior the PA AH1s are compared to the latest mark AH-1Z offered to Turkey ?

    in reply to: Indian Air Force Pictures #2690759
    Indian1973
    Participant

    yeah best set of iaf pics I seen yet.

    for some reason unknown to me, the iaf hinds also practice dropping a large bomb carried under the belly. I saw it in the akash yoddha/sote video cant remember which now.

    in reply to: Pakistan's Cobras Please #2690841
    Indian1973
    Participant

    >much higher ratio of support for Pak armour….

    if you dont account for the 150-200 CAS a/c IAF can devote to
    the Pak armour, armed Dhruvs, Milan2T and konkurs ATGMs and
    in 2-5 yrs Nag on BMP, LCH and AT submunitions on rocket systems. theres even LAHAT ATGM tested on arjun now…a buy of 1000 is planned after tests.

    not good.

    in reply to: Pakistan's Cobras Please #2690844
    Indian1973
    Participant

    the Hinds preferred attack mode is a fast run , sometimes a dive.

    anyway to repeat the obvious it isnt the way IA is going as development path, Dhruv and LCH will be the mainstay anti armour role in future and there’s no proposal to get any more Hinds.

    and who said they performed poorly in Sri lanka? they were used only once or twice with terrifying results for the LTTE. due to urban nature of much fighting the higher command never truly released the Hinds or heavy artillery for unrestricted ops for fear of civilian casualties. the LTTE had nothing to catch the Hinds
    with and I believe not a single one was lost to hostile fire.

    in reply to: Pakistan's Cobras Please #2690848
    Indian1973
    Participant

    IAF was flying armed MI-8s during Kargil, one was even shot down by Pakistan Army, so to describe them as unarmed is innacurate!

    thats a poor recollection of history. it was a Mi17 armed only
    with rockets and no flare dispensers.

    the “new” Mi17s are a different matter . they have self-defence
    suite and ATGMs. the “old” Mi17s have also got flare dispensers now.

    IAF will use the “new” Mi17s for action only in kargil type heights
    which is above the service ceiling of Mi25. the Hinds will be used in plains and desert.

    anyway you are neglecting the armed Dhruv of which there will
    be 100s in the inventory , around 10 are in service with IA already..and its more specialized variant the LCH both feature a israeli avionics suite under the joint agreement. both will have Nah top-attack ATGM.

    thats the development path, old cobras arent going to cut it esp if India arms its dhruvs with something like a hot-off-the-rail python4. thats why I mentioned WZ10.

    more “new” Mi17Vs will continue to be laid in for the medium transport and kashmir attack role.

    in reply to: Pakistan's Cobras Please #2691350
    Indian1973
    Participant

    the indian Alouettes and Mi8s arent the “cutting edge” of anti-armour work. They are unarmed utility choppers.

    I was speaking of the AH-1s. why buy old crap when the WZ-10 will soon be available!

    in reply to: Pakistan's Cobras Please #2691620
    Indian1973
    Participant

    …and thats the future of PA aviation? doesnt sound threatening..
    no Hellfires either?

    in reply to: Velly Interesting news re: J-11s in PLAAF service #2691720
    Indian1973
    Participant

    how much PLA/AF resources are between the Sikkim border
    and Lhasa ? on the map it looks quite near.

    in reply to: Pakistan's Cobras Please #2691798
    Indian1973
    Participant

    PAF_fan I agree that things which shake ones worldview can be
    very demoralizing, but they need to be addressed all the same.

    to me you have as much credibility as anyone elsewhere and I
    will take the tanknets people opinions on tanks anyday over yours.

    “most modern non-NATO corps” bwahahahaha.

    in reply to: Is the Great Britain a thing of the past? #2691822
    Indian1973
    Participant

    acc. to an article in the leftist Guardian or Independent there are US navy technicians inside some mountain in scotland who control the programming of Trident missiles onboard british SSBNs. was published in 2001 / 02.

    does UK have any imint sats to independently gather hi-res images for targeting of Tridents or Tomahawks ?

Viewing 15 posts - 1,621 through 1,635 (of 1,845 total)