dark light

Indian1973

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 511 through 525 (of 1,845 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Stavatti planes #2617385
    Indian1973
    Participant

    on the +ve side 3 of the windows are boarded up – perhaps to hide the models of
    X-planes inside from spies and traitors. the engineers probably use that dumpster outside as a dormitory 🙁

    read his commercial strategy here:
    http://www.stavatti.com/documents/AIAA-ITAR.pdf

    Indian1973
    Participant

    depends on whether they want service for their scads of russian origin systems like kilo, ASMs, SAMs, su30MKK, Sovremeniy, AAMs 🙂

    if not , the way is clear!

    in reply to: IN News and Discussion #2067634
    Indian1973
    Participant

    maybe you can live in subzero northern russian winter temperatures in a tent ?

    in reply to: Stavatti planes #2617867
    Indian1973
    Participant

    must be a brother of that Maglev pioneer Herr Wagner 😀

    in reply to: IAF news and pics Thread : Oct 2004 + #2617872
    Indian1973
    Participant

    the IAF Jaguar article that appeared in AFM (lots of personal photos)

    http://www.bharat-rakshak.com/IAF/Info/Aircraft/Jaguar-25Yrs.html

    in reply to: Brahmos #2054390
    Indian1973
    Participant

    “upto 300kg” . maybe the decrease the warhead by 100kg and enlarge the fuel tank 😉

    in reply to: U.K. military tanker deal reportedly under threat #2617929
    Indian1973
    Participant

    A330 all the way. superb range, ideal size & payload.

    I just hate the DC-10/MD-11 after a couple of flight sitting in the
    infamous 5th seat in middle block of seats.

    in reply to: New fc1 pic #2618011
    Indian1973
    Participant

    two questions:
    – isnt it unstable in just one axis ?
    – Owlet Dragon was the name we heard, whats this Fierce Dragon thing?

    in reply to: Brahmos #2054552
    Indian1973
    Participant

    http://www.thehindubusinessline.com/2004/11/04/stories/2004110402820400.htm

    BrahMos anti-ship missile tested

    M. Somasekhar

    Hyderabad , Nov. 3

    THE Naval version of the supersonic cruiser missile BrahMos was successfully tested for the eighth time in a row by Indian defence scientists from the Interim Test Range (ITR), Balasore today.

    The anti-ship version of BrahMos missile launched from a Naval warship hit the target – a decommissioned ship – setting it on fire, the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of BrahMos, Dr Sivathanu Pillai, said.

    “The major achievements of the tests were the mid-course manoeuvrability of the missile and the advanced fire control systems, which functioned 100 per cent,” Dr Pillai told Business Line over telephone from Balasore.

    With today’s test timed at 11.17 a.m., the development phase of a naval target missile launched from a ship platform has been completed and all the requirements needed to prove its capability for the user demonstrated.

    The high manoeuvrability demonstrated dispels a myth in the missile community that the supersonic range of missiles cannot be manoeuvred. In war scenarios such versatility is required and gives tactical advantage to the user, he said.

    The Indian Navy has already placed a Letter of Interest (LOI) for the production of the missile, he said.

    BrahMos, an Indo-Russian missile consortium, with research institutes and industry participating from both countries, has already begun the production of this 290-km range anti-ship missile and the induction would start on schedule in 2005, the CEO said.

    The next phase of trials for the BrahMos missile would be for hitting land targets, especially from a ship and surface-to-surface,land-to-land, which would be taken up soon, Dr Pillai said.
    😉

    in reply to: China's news, pics and speculation thread part deux #2618418
    Indian1973
    Participant

    the Su30 photo in page7 of this thread shows the M-400 pod and presumably the Sapsan LDP slung beneath the fuselage. The poster said its MKK2.

    what would be the diffs between MKK2 and MKK3 ?

    in reply to: Raptors at $258 Million each. #2618560
    Indian1973
    Participant

    do we have enough public source info on the claimed LFI and ECM capabilities of the APG77 to be making confident statements of “raptor can do this / that and u wouldnt know it ?”

    I wouldnt trust AWST type sources a whole lot because they are the PRAVDA of the US aerospace industry 😉

    theres a huge vested interest for the Raptors within the pentagon
    so all reports are bound to be rosy.

    the things about speed, range etc. that should be as they claim.

    in reply to: China's news, pics and speculation thread part deux #2618571
    Indian1973
    Participant

    ok so whats the deal here.
    (a) how many flankers are there today ? types ?
    (b) how many are on order and NOT cancelled above?

    in reply to: China's news, pics and speculation thread part deux #2618585
    Indian1973
    Participant

    china stops production of SU-27SK jets at 95/200

    http://www.mosnews.com/money/2004/11/02/chinajets.shtml

    in reply to: Victor III #2067713
    Indian1973
    Participant

    I think in heavy seas more chances of the lookout post on conning tower being awash. not that a SSN would be doing U-boat attacks on the surface though.

    in reply to: IAF news and pics Thread : Oct 2004 + #2618945
    Indian1973
    Participant

    A mig-21 crashed today on a night sortie around 9:30PM from Nal airbase in gujrat. pilot ejected safely.

Viewing 15 posts - 511 through 525 (of 1,845 total)