PRESS INFORMATION BUREAU (DEFENCE WING)
GOVERNMENT OF INDA
IAF CHEETAL SETS WORLD RECORD
New Delhi: 02 November 2004
An IAF Cheetal Helicopter set a new world record at 0845 hrs today on 02 Nov 04 by landing at a Density Altitude of 25,150 ft at Saserkangri near Leh.
Earlier, a Bell 407 helicopter held the world record in landing at the highest altitude, 22, 180 ft, Pressure Altitude (24,971 ft Density Altitude) achieved on Jul 28, 2004. This morning at 0845 hrs, a Cheetal helicopter, bettered this record in style. Flown by Gp Capt AS Butola and Sqn Ldr S Sharma, the helicopter landed at Saserkangri at an altitude of 23,220 ft (7070 mts) Pressure Altitude (25,150 ft / 7670 mts Density Altitude). The feat was witnessed and validated by Wg Cdr Upadhayay (Retd), Chief Test Pilot, Rotary Wing, HAL and Wg Cdr Uni Pillay (Retd), flying in an IAF Dhruv helicopter.
The motivation behind this attempt was the fact that a Cheetah helicopter of the IAF had landed at a record density altitude of 23, 240 ft just a few months ago – not in the quest of a record, but to rescue causalities from a mountaineering expedition, in extremely challenging conditions. This rescue was accomplished in a Cheetah helicopter powered by the old Artouste-3C, of 847 Horse power. The Cheetal features a Cheetah airframe and the more powerful TM-333-2B2, 1000 Hp Engine, which is fitted on the Advanced Light Helicopter. The combination of a light airframe and a more powerful engine has resulted in a leaner and more capable machine, permitting a higher payload – a critical requirement when operating at the extreme altitudes of the glacier where every gram matters matter. The IAF has been associated in putting this machine through its trials and is all set to procure them for operational service in the IAF. The synergy between the IAF and the Indian Aviation Industry has churned out this winner.
so was the Victor-III the first appearance of the “Akula style hulls” or were there previous Soviet submarines with the blended sail concept ?
does anyone know the pros and cons of blended sails? the USN uses the conventional sail type even in its latest submarines.
there are rumours on the net that Munir == PLA 😉
GD you are right about small navies but the way the cards are falling none of france, italy, spain or india are small navies even today. they would have plenty to spare after devoting a couple next-gen AAW ships and a submarine to protect a carrier against a medium threat (not a USN threat or a land-based 200 flanker strike). the cost of operating modern a/c and a conventional good powerplant like LM-2500 is not significantly different that a couple squadrons of land based plane and a few large destroyers which that all do as a matter of routine. worldwide, those who desire power will increase the % of their navy budget.
Thailand and Brazil’s case could be different.
the local AJT is not going to be much different from the IJT. Just a fatter fuselage , two AL55 engines and ofcourse a more advanced cockpit.
France is negotiating to join the UK’s 60KT carrier program. it would solve the french problem with the costly nuke plant on de-gaulle and reduce the unit cost also.
efficiency and winning (either staying alive or crushing the set of potential enemies) are two different things.
a lot of people will not care for efficiency if theres a good chance at the
second. nuclear weapon programs are also highly inefficient for the money spent – megabucks of $$ and its not even used after 1945.
Yet people still like to keep them. you cannot look upon national security/prestige/goals from a corporate shareholder pov.
also no other ambitious nation but one at the moment needs to
deal with USN as its main potential adversary. so that particular nations special set of circumstances doesnt hold true for someone like Italy, Spain or India.
the Gorshkov armed with the Mig29K would be the 3rd most powerful
of the lot until the new UK-French carriers start to roll out. The indian 38KT ADS when it comes would again be more powerful than gorshkov by virtue of a dedicated and brand new design. The Italian Cavour armed with JSF should also be a formidable ship. the 32 Aster-15 + EMPAR give it a great defensive shield but to begin with the Harriers dont compare well to the JSF specs.
for the pounding role I think they will continue with B-52 until the year 2099 (!) while F-22 clears out whatever little remains of the next little country they invade’s air force.
quite a tag-team eh? The Rock + Chyna :p
the quoted range is for 1 ton payload I believe. per Arun_s and his rocksim calculations it is around 700km for a 250kg nuclear payload.
this would permit the firing submarine to strike coastal targets from the deep ocean.
saved some money printing out new signs I expect.
Sea Kings have a max payload of 3.6 tons. But fuel is not so dense,
so fuel weight depends on what size tanks they can fit inside, some kind of self-sealing rubber bladders that can be dragged off when not needed would be ideal.
the pure flight testing part of the program was supposed to last
around 300 flights which is now reached. PV2 is the initial production variant and has the bells and whistles. maybe starting with TD-1 , the stuff that needs to be tested now like avionics will be fitted into TD1,2 and PV1?
zero RCS = no reports in media 🙂
2-3 hits would mission kill the CVN and get some large fires going.
if the powerplant is safe it would still sail away under own power though.
thats when you need planB of a spread of Type65 wake homers to work and chew off the tail. A couple under the keel and a couple on the tail to destroy the engine spaces and propellers would likely sink the beast slowly.