dark light

Indian1973

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 526 through 540 (of 1,845 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: IAF news and pics Thread : Oct 2004 + #2618947
    Indian1973
    Participant

    PRESS INFORMATION BUREAU (DEFENCE WING)

    GOVERNMENT OF INDA

    IAF CHEETAL SETS WORLD RECORD

    New Delhi: 02 November 2004

    An IAF Cheetal Helicopter set a new world record at 0845 hrs today on 02 Nov 04 by landing at a Density Altitude of 25,150 ft at Saserkangri near Leh.

    Earlier, a Bell 407 helicopter held the world record in landing at the highest altitude, 22, 180 ft, Pressure Altitude (24,971 ft Density Altitude) achieved on Jul 28, 2004. This morning at 0845 hrs, a Cheetal helicopter, bettered this record in style. Flown by Gp Capt AS Butola and Sqn Ldr S Sharma, the helicopter landed at Saserkangri at an altitude of 23,220 ft (7070 mts) Pressure Altitude (25,150 ft / 7670 mts Density Altitude). The feat was witnessed and validated by Wg Cdr Upadhayay (Retd), Chief Test Pilot, Rotary Wing, HAL and Wg Cdr Uni Pillay (Retd), flying in an IAF Dhruv helicopter.

    The motivation behind this attempt was the fact that a Cheetah helicopter of the IAF had landed at a record density altitude of 23, 240 ft just a few months ago – not in the quest of a record, but to rescue causalities from a mountaineering expedition, in extremely challenging conditions. This rescue was accomplished in a Cheetah helicopter powered by the old Artouste-3C, of 847 Horse power. The Cheetal features a Cheetah airframe and the more powerful TM-333-2B2, 1000 Hp Engine, which is fitted on the Advanced Light Helicopter. The combination of a light airframe and a more powerful engine has resulted in a leaner and more capable machine, permitting a higher payload – a critical requirement when operating at the extreme altitudes of the glacier where every gram matters matter. The IAF has been associated in putting this machine through its trials and is all set to procure them for operational service in the IAF. The synergy between the IAF and the Indian Aviation Industry has churned out this winner.

    in reply to: Victor III #2067722
    Indian1973
    Participant

    so was the Victor-III the first appearance of the “Akula style hulls” or were there previous Soviet submarines with the blended sail concept ?

    does anyone know the pros and cons of blended sails? the USN uses the conventional sail type even in its latest submarines.

    in reply to: New fc1 pic #2619207
    Indian1973
    Participant

    there are rumours on the net that Munir == PLA 😉

    in reply to: aircraft carriers, the best leaving out America? #2619209
    Indian1973
    Participant

    GD you are right about small navies but the way the cards are falling none of france, italy, spain or india are small navies even today. they would have plenty to spare after devoting a couple next-gen AAW ships and a submarine to protect a carrier against a medium threat (not a USN threat or a land-based 200 flanker strike). the cost of operating modern a/c and a conventional good powerplant like LM-2500 is not significantly different that a couple squadrons of land based plane and a few large destroyers which that all do as a matter of routine. worldwide, those who desire power will increase the % of their navy budget.

    Thailand and Brazil’s case could be different.

    in reply to: IAF news and pics Thread : Oct 2004 + #2619285
    Indian1973
    Participant

    the local AJT is not going to be much different from the IJT. Just a fatter fuselage , two AL55 engines and ofcourse a more advanced cockpit.

    in reply to: aircraft carriers, the best leaving out America? #2619336
    Indian1973
    Participant

    France is negotiating to join the UK’s 60KT carrier program. it would solve the french problem with the costly nuke plant on de-gaulle and reduce the unit cost also.

    in reply to: aircraft carriers, the best leaving out America? #2619365
    Indian1973
    Participant

    efficiency and winning (either staying alive or crushing the set of potential enemies) are two different things.

    a lot of people will not care for efficiency if theres a good chance at the
    second. nuclear weapon programs are also highly inefficient for the money spent – megabucks of $$ and its not even used after 1945.

    Yet people still like to keep them. you cannot look upon national security/prestige/goals from a corporate shareholder pov.

    also no other ambitious nation but one at the moment needs to
    deal with USN as its main potential adversary. so that particular nations special set of circumstances doesnt hold true for someone like Italy, Spain or India.

    in reply to: aircraft carriers, the best leaving out America? #2619373
    Indian1973
    Participant

    the Gorshkov armed with the Mig29K would be the 3rd most powerful
    of the lot until the new UK-French carriers start to roll out. The indian 38KT ADS when it comes would again be more powerful than gorshkov by virtue of a dedicated and brand new design. The Italian Cavour armed with JSF should also be a formidable ship. the 32 Aster-15 + EMPAR give it a great defensive shield but to begin with the Harriers dont compare well to the JSF specs.

    in reply to: Raptors at $258 Million each. #2619733
    Indian1973
    Participant

    for the pounding role I think they will continue with B-52 until the year 2099 (!) while F-22 clears out whatever little remains of the next little country they invade’s air force.

    quite a tag-team eh? The Rock + Chyna :p

    in reply to: Prithvi-3 and Dhanush #2054931
    Indian1973
    Participant

    the quoted range is for 1 ton payload I believe. per Arun_s and his rocksim calculations it is around 700km for a 250kg nuclear payload.
    this would permit the firing submarine to strike coastal targets from the deep ocean.

    in reply to: IAF news and pics Thread : Oct 2004 + #2619904
    Indian1973
    Participant

    saved some money printing out new signs I expect.

    in reply to: IN News and Discussion #2067845
    Indian1973
    Participant

    Sea Kings have a max payload of 3.6 tons. But fuel is not so dense,
    so fuel weight depends on what size tanks they can fit inside, some kind of self-sealing rubber bladders that can be dragged off when not needed would be ideal.

    in reply to: Status LCA #2620265
    Indian1973
    Participant

    the pure flight testing part of the program was supposed to last
    around 300 flights which is now reached. PV2 is the initial production variant and has the bells and whistles. maybe starting with TD-1 , the stuff that needs to be tested now like avionics will be fitted into TD1,2 and PV1?

    in reply to: Status LCA #2620427
    Indian1973
    Participant

    zero RCS = no reports in media 🙂

    in reply to: Russian attack capabilities #2055068
    Indian1973
    Participant

    2-3 hits would mission kill the CVN and get some large fires going.
    if the powerplant is safe it would still sail away under own power though.

    thats when you need planB of a spread of Type65 wake homers to work and chew off the tail. A couple under the keel and a couple on the tail to destroy the engine spaces and propellers would likely sink the beast slowly.

Viewing 15 posts - 526 through 540 (of 1,845 total)