so in Kg what do they translate to. India Govt uses metric system though certain parts like the navy could be using other measures.
is the Russian AF updating their Su27 or buying new Su35 ?
If Russia doesnt buy Su35, the brazil order is too small to make it
a viable product. they would be better just buying off the MKI/M or MKK lineage.
in the first case its the end of the line and we cant expect any more itertions of the Flanker, sukhoi needs to asap start working on the Pak-Fa to be ready when JSF floods the world market.
avionics etc would be kept on updated on FLanker for next 20 yrs
per customer req. the Irbis radar , M400 pod etc.
per International defence review Oct1, 2004 …Russia has delivered
9 KA31 AEW helis to India for operation from present and future carriers and Krivak-III ships.
article has lot of details on the eqpt. china and some south american countries mentioned as potential customers.
but the saying was the fuel and weapons couldnt both be the max possible. ie. the sum could never be 38T for the plane to actually fly .
the pt on foreign avionics is +ve point in favour of IAPO. kinda implies though the end user attaches more value to said package of avionics than the more powerful AL35F engines and somewhat redesigned fuselage of the SU35.
Malaysia recently signed with IAPO for 20 Flankers from the MKM label. It will be similar config as MKI but they have set aside another $200+ mil to buy their own choice of avionics from europe (they wont use any israeli stuff)
Was the Su35 ever offered to Malaysia ? why or why not ?
p.s. I dont want “feelings” or “positions” but only some published
account on the reason(s) please.
it was over the barents sea.
the danger of permanent vertebral injury is high enough in a controlled ejection without trying the belly land thing. a.c can be replaced easier than a sqdn ldr. he will be on ground for months recovering and kept under observation.
Bhairav, the 10 more M2Ks have been contracted for about 4 yrs ago and they are ready for delivery. a outdated navigation module that IAF wants replaced was holding it up.
arabs have been officially and unofficially saying the “we shall burn the zionists and throw them into the sea” mantra for decades now, I am just reading a book on the six-day 1965 war and such rhetoric was quite common then too,as in 1948 …. iran atleast hasnt directly fought
with israel – algeria, morocco, saudis, sudan, libya, egypt, jordan,
iraq and syria have sent ground and air force against israel.
there are things done by despot rulers to distract and pacify the
people on street and things done in serious councils of power. they very well remember the beatings Israel has administered and will administer if they do any such thing like trying a N-attack. No part of the arab world will be left safe from israel’s reply.
But they will heckle and bark all the same … just to feel good and
bolster morale.
griffin_pak, it was the 88.
Mpacha, the exercise and airshow display should not be affected.
PLA, what route ? it was kept flying for 2 hrs to burn all fuel
and directed to crash near a village 140km from Gwalior.
a third M2K squadron has started conversion training per media reps. the 10 M2K-H awaiting delivery (after a replacement nav module is inserted) and extras from present pool will top up this sqdn. a Mig23 sqdn has been numberplated.
I think india bought 50 mirages(?) of which 46 remain today. about 10 are likely in attrition storage.
other than a few small pix in brahmos.com and Harry’s pix from defexpo, none exist.
Navy mulls joint patrols with singapore and malaysia
http://www.telegraphindia.com/1040923/asp/nation/story_3791028.asp
this is the 4th crash. others were in 1987, 88 and 94.
quite a amazing record for the M2K designers considering its high uptime and single engine.
Iraq is poised for a civil war and eventual breakup into 3 nations.
Going after Iran pretty much ensures they will lay waste to both Iraq and western afghanistan via proxies. If the Paks sign on into this adventure then Iran will rouse the Shia extremists and baluchis in Pak as well.
So the end result is likely to be Iraq being another afghanistan, about 3 million more terrorist prospective recruits across the lslamic nations and no end to the middle east crises.
American is hardly able to police Iraq – a nation 4x less size and population than iran and whose people had suffered under saddam. Iranians may not like the hardline mullahs much but they are a deeply patriotic people I think and wont take kindly to any occupier. It will be a bottomless swamp if anyone goes in.
Iran has not been caught attempting to sell their tech anywhere, unlike another nation which borders them and supposedly a faithful “ally” of the gorilla. So I think the world can live with a nuclear iran.
imo Iran hasnt been on the anti-american terrorist/al-keeda bandwagon for quite a while now around 15 yrs. they do provide aid to hezbollah in lebanon I think.
Their record on terrorism export is way better than two of their neighbours who are both in Gorilla’s lap as “allies in war on terror”. One of them takes out full page ads in US media speaking of their contributions to war on terror, but the funding of extremist madrasas all across the world via their oil dollars continues to destablize nations like bangladesh.
I can confirm that barak today cannot intercept supersonic ASMs.
there is some talk of india funding a super-barak for that. this has been reported a few times in indian media.
IN has hundred+ of Urans deployed at sea on ships, for low
value targets these will do. for higher value or large targets a shot or two of brahmos. and for cat-1 targets my idea of a massed single quadrant attack is probably what the Russians also plan for with their Oscar SSGNs.