dark light

Indian1973

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 676 through 690 (of 1,845 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Brahmos #2057052
    Indian1973
    Participant

    when is the much hyped NSM going to enter service ?

    to me it looks like a decent if very range limited weapon against
    land targets. A range of 150km means the firing platform has to move deep within the enemy’s air defences to even go after coastal targets…not a good idea unless the firer is a submarine.
    I doubt modern short range SAMs and guns will have
    much trouble taking it out with a fair amt of ease.

    USN ships wont be scared by any number of these pinpricks and
    thats what both India and China want to deter in the future. something heavier , faster and nastier is a must. China is also developing its own line of tools for that apart from laying in russian gear.

    for manouvers doesnt Sunburn and its cousins throw S-shaped terminal moves to convert the intercept into a much harder crossing engagements for the shooter ? I suspect its a lot harder to deal with a crossing mach2+ target than one coming straight at you?

    in reply to: Brahmos #2057063
    Indian1973
    Participant

    thanks for clearing up matters. with each MKI slated to carry 3x brahmos each, a trooplet of 4 a/c could strike out against a SAG with 12 of these kittens ripple fired within a few seconds ALL from the same quadrant 😀

    APAR can handle 4 in a quadrant ? 😀

    how many does SPY-1D tackle per quadrant ?

    its a very unpleasant scenario for the naval commander.

    I think Tuollaf pointed out what JonS does that against
    supersonic crossing targets the efective range of even Aster30 is not much at all.

    in reply to: Brahmos #2057131
    Indian1973
    Participant

    what is the source of all this detailed information ? is it in
    some sales brochure or just “guesses” ?

    If matters were so simple as described in above posts I
    doubt India would be investing the time & money to equip
    its ships and planes with this weapon 😉 Klub was a option
    and that seems to have been superceded by the brahmos plans.

    in reply to: SU30MKI v/s SU-35 #2644665
    Indian1973
    Participant

    can you lessen the usage of TVC if you have canards – getting things done with control surfaces than with vectored thrust?

    also is TVC better/equal to TVC+canards at slow speeds on the
    same airframe?

    Flankers are huge a/c and need every scrap of agility to deal with
    nimble opponents at short range.

    in reply to: Novator 3M14 LACM phase1 complete #2072125
    Indian1973
    Participant

    > looks like a captured tomahawk

    the big diff in the thawk has a turbofan and this thing has a turbojet. so its not a clone. as for the shape and wing form, is there anything else compact and light enough for the tube launched CM role that differs from this layout ?

    in reply to: Greece vs Turkey #2646208
    Indian1973
    Participant

    Moderated, no bickering about moderation or percieved lack thereof.
    People who dont respect the power of Turkish AF are just hiding their heads in the sand. I have no bias in the turkish greek issues but willing to acknowledge good stuff anywhere.

    for the strategic POV one has to admit Turkey is far more of
    a asset to NATO/US than Greece for a host of reasons
    including its location, population, access to the middle east
    etc.

    people who do not have any valid argument or are just
    drunk boors by nature tend to pick on acronyms, grammar,
    minor errors if they cant whine about anything else.

    in reply to: Greece vs Turkey #2647230
    Indian1973
    Participant

    Mystic_J, what part of the posted Orbat (yeah they will get some 737 awacs rather than eyerie as if that nit matters) dont you agree with ? 220 F-16 + 110 F-4 sounds mighty good enough to me.

    in reply to: Greece vs Turkey #2647299
    Indian1973
    Participant

    Looking at the orbat must say for its size and economy, Turkey has a HUGELY powerful TuAF.

    with the addition of Ereyie definitely a top drawer AF.

    in reply to: True or False? J10A uses WS10A, Pakistan to get J10A #2649282
    Indian1973
    Participant

    the S-300 has a very rudimentary ATBM capability esp against the latest Chinese IRBM types used by both PLA and PA (not Scud). the S-400 is a unknown quantity to me. indian officials have never observed a real live test wherein it took down a good IRBM.

    Its not the missiles that make the difference but the control center, early warning sats and the huge radars like greenpine or its russian equivalent. Without early warning from US sats (which Israel gets), its a crap shoot and chances of successful intercepts decline.

    since india doesnt have such sats and wont have it atleast for next 10 yrs, there is little point in buying a expensive system at this stage which will be obsolete by the time india acquires the rest of the “eco-system”.

    better to let both russia and israel keep on developing their stuff via
    chinese and american cash infusions for now and jump in at the appropriate time.

    in reply to: True or False? J10A uses WS10A, Pakistan to get J10A #2649394
    Indian1973
    Participant

    what is the estimate of russian operated S300/400 TELs ?

    in reply to: True or False? J10A uses WS10A, Pakistan to get J10A #2649454
    Indian1973
    Participant

    folks pls check the S-300 for china thread. the first , second and third orders addup to a few hundred TELs and likely 1500 missiles multiplying by four. the third order has just been placed and they wouldnt be spending $1 billion right now if something domestic of similar capability was available in near future.

    total investment is surely in the $2.5-3 billion range for the S300 systems alone and definitely the largest heavy-SAM deployment ever in world history.

    At the lower end per Huitong’s site they are license making a bunch of stuff like Tor in hundreds of units. perhaps Tunguska too?

    in reply to: DENMARK'S RDN ABSALON-THE WAY FORWARD? #2072665
    Indian1973
    Participant

    well what use would this ships land complement other than in a peacekeeping op or fighting a batallion of tribals somewhere ?
    too few, too small to matter.

    serious expeditionary land ops need serious ships like the Tarawa class.

    in reply to: Blast, Mushroom Cloud Reported in N. Korea #2057551
    Indian1973
    Participant

    the US Govt says everything is allright and under control, so everything must really be ok.

    New instructions from the Komissar will follow soon, pls remain
    calm.

    in reply to: "Su-35BM" actually the next Su-27SM stage? #2650534
    Indian1973
    Participant

    So Irbis = Bars + sw changes + better servo motors for horizontal scan ?

    If so, Bars could be upg’ed to Irbis with relatively minor keyhole surgery. or the HAL made MKI’s could started using
    the Irbis front end….

    in reply to: Ofeq-6's Launch Failed #2057591
    Indian1973
    Participant
Viewing 15 posts - 676 through 690 (of 1,845 total)