dark light

Indian1973

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 691 through 705 (of 1,845 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Pakistan bombs "terrorist camp", kills at least 50 #2652852
    Indian1973
    Participant

    US elections draweth near.

    in reply to: True or False? J10A uses WS10A, Pakistan to get J10A #2653138
    Indian1973
    Participant

    someone like aerospacetech, SOC or ELP may know the usual ratio of
    spare engines

    in reply to: Pakistan bombs "terrorist camp", kills at least 50 #2653170
    Indian1973
    Participant

    sigh.

    in reply to: China emerges as a maritime power #2073291
    Indian1973
    Participant

    7 new SSN/SSBN within 5 years plus 16 SSK looks very high estimate.

    I dont think even soviet union at its height built at such a rate.

    in reply to: True or False? J10A uses WS10A, Pakistan to get J10A #2653465
    Indian1973
    Participant

    it wont land in the hands of India, but the US could ask for a “close” look in Langley 😉

    in reply to: True or False? J10A uses WS10A, Pakistan to get J10A #2653531
    Indian1973
    Participant

    the dry thrust being a bit lower than comparable engines maybe
    because of flat rating concept. i.e. it will produce the same thrust regardless of hot or high operation – something that PRC needs to take into account. I am not taking the thrust figure literally just
    a comment.

    another country to the south is working on a engine with the
    same concept 😉

    in reply to: True or False? J10A uses WS10A, Pakistan to get J10A #2653555
    Indian1973
    Participant

    I am prepared to believe this more than Gripen/Rafale deal. Its logical choice, safe sanction-proof supply chain and the host country plans to have J10 in hundreds of units and multiple versions.

    The $20 mil price with EU avionics and radar sounds a bit low. someone
    here was claiming the RDY2 cost $8 mil all by itself! PRC would have to supply the airframe and engine at a deep discount to make that price. or maybe he meant without some avionics and radar?

    in reply to: Surface warfare #2073449
    Indian1973
    Participant

    how far is PLAN from getting a decent fleet of AIP equipped SSK ?

    that would even the odds somewhat.

    in reply to: Surface warfare #2073466
    Indian1973
    Participant

    PLAN ships are very weak in ASW. Few if any have decent sonars
    and helicopter coverage is weak.

    I think the advanced Blair class submarine HMS Jonesy should rack up quite a few easy kills there 😉

    in reply to: Ofeq-6's Launch Failed #2057793
    Indian1973
    Participant

    Israel already has a downlink from US early warning sats to alert its Arrow system and will get wind of any missile attack from islamic nations quite early.

    But the access to high quality KH12 10cm res imint wont be given or rarely
    because Unkil would want NOBODY ELSE to have that capability.

    Thats why israel is going its own way with Ofek-x.

    in reply to: Missile collection #2057886
    Indian1973
    Participant

    good thread GDL. please post more if you have it.

    Would be interesting to know the cost of the tactical missiles like SS-21, Iskander and SS-23. A cost above $10 mil makes it very costly for conventional use.

    in reply to: Ofeq-6's Launch Failed #2057944
    Indian1973
    Participant

    hmmmm…. I hear the dry growl of F-15 Raam engines over the Negev

    Unkil will go ape**** though and maybe administer a sharp slap on the wrist
    for once…. followed by another big military aid package 😉

    in reply to: Ofeq-6's Launch Failed #2057953
    Indian1973
    Participant

    If you had read the articles properly Israel seems to have funding problems just to keep
    a single spysat in orbit. They dont need to launch enough sats to perfect and improve their launchers and Shavit failed with Ofek4 also.

    There is a readymade solution to the problem. Indias PSLV which has a proven record
    of lofting multiple sats into MEO orbit and has a 1-ton into GTO coming up next year (metsat). It can loft atleast twice the shavit payload into LEO permitting large and more functional sats without pinching the space and power budgets designers face.

    In exchange I am sure India wouldnt mind buying a couple of Ofek6s outright followed by buying of components for our own spysats. the interest in leasing capacity in Ofek5 is already public 😀 israeli components are almost certainly part of our TES (1m res iminit) and maybe upcoming cartosats also (3D terrain mapper for awacs and cruise missile application) and the planned successor to TES. Nobody else will be selling such sensitive components.

    india also has a better launching spot and obviously no leakage of tech to the unfriendly elements. looks like US doesnt want Israel to have any independent spysats
    or launch vehicles at all (typical Unkil tactic) so getting US funding or help isnt an option.

    http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?pagename=JPost/JPArticle/ShowFull&cid=1094440992585

    http://www.globes.co.il/DocsEn/did=727269.htm 😉

    in reply to: Ofeq-6's Launch Failed #2057967
    Indian1973
    Participant

    condolences.

    in reply to: Photographs from Devonport August 2004 #2073803
    Indian1973
    Participant

    I thought so. wanted to confirm it. thanks.

Viewing 15 posts - 691 through 705 (of 1,845 total)