dark light

Indian1973

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1,351 through 1,365 (of 1,845 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: PAK FA Thread #2694404
    Indian1973
    Participant

    I think the Pak-fa and 5th gen fighter may be different projects.
    india has no real need for a new fighter until 2030 -until then lca
    and mki versions will rule the roost.
    india needs a strike a/c the MCA and the PAK-FA looks like a
    A2A bird to me. there may be collaboration with russia and others
    on the MCA …whatever it is called later.

    in reply to: Mirage III vs MiG-21BIS #2696053
    Indian1973
    Participant

    IAF is gradually moving its center of gravity into larger bases
    in the interior. the existing bases close to border are very
    crowded for space and close to human habitations and ofcourse
    they are like 10 mins from border. Mig21s need these kind
    of bases 😡 due to short legs.

    in reply to: Mirage III vs MiG-21BIS #2696075
    Indian1973
    Participant

    I have heard the Mig29A/B is also a real dawg on the cockpit
    interface. The pilot has to flip a lot of switches to lock up a target and release a missile on it?

    The Mirage2000 didnt it use some FBW tricks to smooth out
    the rough delta wing ride at low level and ofcourse the 2000D
    has the TFR Antilope5 for all-weather lo-lo-lo work ?

    in reply to: Some Indian Gorshkov details.. #2696167
    Indian1973
    Participant

    Shtil2 mythical beast, no VLS ==> no no.
    Aster is here, working ==> must have toy.

    in reply to: Atlas Cava light weight fighter.. a Hoax? #2696216
    Indian1973
    Participant

    if the wing size be considered the same, its about 1m longer
    than the LCA. also its features a more traditional delta than the
    LCA whose outer section has a more deeper sweep.

    Pakistan could have had this 10 years before the FC-1, had it
    gone through. heck, they could have had it before the LCA itself 😉

    in reply to: Mirage III vs MiG-21BIS #2696377
    Indian1973
    Participant

    they may not see the bison but hear RWR
    warning of kopyo and see a small flame signifying a inbound aa12 or aa11.

    defenders will fly low if attackers fly low. same
    for F7’s going after Jags/Mig27s.

    in reply to: Mirage III vs MiG-21BIS #2696383
    Indian1973
    Participant

    how does the PAF ROSE mirages rate vs
    the -21 Bisons?

    it a 100% probability these two will tangle
    in any indo-pak flareup. bisons on point defence will meet Mirage-IIIs on strike.

    in reply to: Hindustan HF-73 … a LCA predecessor ?? #2696390
    Indian1973
    Participant

    they are part of INVAR BRASS. you will never know who they are but will be contacted – soon.

    ps. watch for black unmarked vans.

    in reply to: Some Indian Gorshkov details.. #2696454
    Indian1973
    Participant

    sharmaji, Aster30 is the only option there.
    its inevitable for a optimal soln. Shtil is fast
    but too short ranged. the P15A are probably
    the first IN warships of size enuf to take the
    full strike-length Sylver modules from the
    deck level downward.

    in reply to: Some Indian Gorshkov details.. #2696488
    Indian1973
    Participant

    I was thinking Kashtan-M is closed loop like
    goalkeeper or phalanx …its radar tracks both
    the target and outbound cannon shells and
    constantly corrects to bring it on target.

    the original Kashtan was supposedly not
    closed-loop.

    in reply to: Indian Defence News thread #2696715
    Indian1973
    Participant

    Singapore seeks airforce and army training areas in India

    http://www.hinduonnet.com/thehindu/holnus/002200404201868.htm

    I hope they shift some F-16s from Nellis to Gwalior 😉

    in reply to: create an airforce scenario #3 #2696871
    Indian1973
    Participant

    only problem is Tajikistan is also very firmly in the anti-terrorist
    camp…its the homebase of the northern alliance & panjshir valley Tajiks. the life of a taliban/al-quada would be short and painful in Tajikland.
    india maintains a small military airbase in Tajik (farkhor) from back
    in the northern alliance days.

    in reply to: Russian Aircraft Carriers – and catapults #2696872
    Indian1973
    Participant

    so it means USSR did build a steam catapult ? I always
    knew with their robust heavy engg and machinery expertise they
    could put one together if need be.

    in reply to: Some Indian Gorshkov details.. #2696891
    Indian1973
    Participant

    no it wont be named vikrant, becoz the real vikrant is being turned into a floating museum in bombay.

    in reply to: Indonesia: 8 more Flankers #2696893
    Indian1973
    Participant

    http://www.indianexpress.com/full_story.php?content_id=45470

    NEW DELHI, APRIL 20: Singapore has got the go-ahead but Indonesia will have to wait a while before India lends a helping hand in developing the South-East Asian nation’s air power.

    A request from Tentara Nasional Indonesia-Angkatan Udara (TNI-AU) or Indonesian Air Force for training in Sukhoi 30 multi-role fighter jets has been kept on hold by New Delhi on the grounds that India is still in ‘‘consolidation’’ stage on the jets. The TNI-AU recently requested India for assistance training in Sukhoi for pilots and technicians. For that, it said it was willing to source spares for the jets and outsource maintenance work to India.

    Indonesia’s reckoning is that though it currently has two each of Su 27 and Su 30, it plans to grow into a squadron (20 planes) of Sukhois. Before doing that, it wants to send at least a dozen pilots and technicians for training.

    But India has bought time by saying that its Sukhoi programme is still in the developing stages and would need more maturity before it can offer a trainer version of it. Essentially, India is wary of showcasing its latest generation Su-30’s in the rapidly changing Asian security scenario.

Viewing 15 posts - 1,351 through 1,365 (of 1,845 total)