dark light

Indian1973

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1,456 through 1,470 (of 1,845 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: India signs 795mn pound deal for AJTs #2659040
    Indian1973
    Participant

    the Hawk deal as Victor said is the program cost, not just airframes.

    in reply to: Fc-1A changes #2659042
    Indian1973
    Participant

    Planes do undergo structural changes in prototype stage, for instance the horizontal tailfins of F22. But they tend to retain the name until entering service.

    FC1a name doesnt make sense unless they also volume produce the
    base FC1.

    in reply to: India signs 795mn pound deal for AJTs #2659197
    Indian1973
    Participant

    a trinity of big deals is signed phalcon, gorshkov, hawk.

    no more big deals in near future unless iaf wants more Mirage2000s.

    in reply to: Pakistan is a Key US Ally #2659282
    Indian1973
    Participant

    Dalbandin (near Chagai) is the HQ of the US “liaison committee”
    to oversee the PALs.

    no further comments to offer at this stage.

    in reply to: Indian MiG-27 upgrade #2659397
    Indian1973
    Participant

    did Russian mig27s ever have a IFR ? all the other a/c IAF is adding IFR into have always had IFR in their mother airforces – jag, m2k, su30. be interesting to see mig29s are IFRed or not…no photo evidence of that yet.

    in reply to: Pakistani A-5s being prepped for bombing OBL's butt! #2660057
    Indian1973
    Participant

    why not a few B52s. Does the job economically. id’ing DNA could be a bear though.

    in reply to: Pakistan is a Key US Ally #2660313
    Indian1973
    Participant

    > We have to avoid becoming a mercenary and a client state

    wise words if spoken in the 1950s. Much too late now. A paid provider of “services” has to deliver on promises.

    I am very happy for both countries today. The “outcourcing” of the vexed Pak problem from India to USA is now formalized.

    Pak can be happy and go its own way, India is now free to downsize its army and pursue other hobbies – behind the well patrolled kashmir fence ofcourse.

    and Bush wins re-election, good for economic / mil ties to India.

    win-win-win.

    in reply to: Italian & Spanish pre-Eurofighter studies ??? #2660611
    Indian1973
    Participant

    did the German-US X-31 serve to validate some EF techniques ?

    Externally it looks similar ….

    http://www.allstar.fiu.edu/aero/images/x-31-c.jpg

    oh I see it *is* the EFA/1

    in reply to: some pics of the flying legends, the Tomcat #2661287
    Indian1973
    Participant

    Can it be argued that F-14 would have failed in its primary fleet airdefence mission had WW3 started ?

    USN plans called for 4-5 CVNs to mass together and proactively
    attack the kola peninsula and the soviet far east. The opposition would be Backfires, Su15, Su24, Mig29s, Mig31s, a few token Forgers, Bear’s of many versions.

    At long or medium range, its long endurance, big radar, multiple fire control channels, WSO, ample space for AAMs would have made it a formidable competitor would it not? and can surge to Mach2 to leave scene if it becomes too hot.

    in reply to: Python 6 #2661602
    Indian1973
    Participant

    has taiwan purchased Mica for its Mirage2000s or it has got amraam integrated ?

    in reply to: Python 6 #2661647
    Indian1973
    Participant

    >No Mil8/24 helos customers buy israel up grade packages,not because it was bad, it was because the Russians dont want to >share their market with IAI/Elbit

    not true. Tamam of israel has completed night fighting upg for indian Mi35s. also Python/Derby would certainly be integrated on IAF Mig27s , Bisons, 29s and 30s if india wants. Derby is in the running for a new AAM for the Jag/Mig27 fleet.

    in reply to: Paper Plane Competition #2662812
    Indian1973
    Participant

    with the kind of drawings shown they arent stealthy either, though a little better.

    anyway with the load of weapons I suggested, you dont need to be stealthy….all I see if the dust tracks of people running for the hills when that load is unleashed.

    in reply to: Paper Plane Competition #2662820
    Indian1973
    Participant

    a payload of 15 tons , internal bays for weapons and fuel kind
    of rules out being “light”.

    Cant you just use a TU22M3 ? its engines are deeply buried
    inside…with some structural mods and RAM coating it could be
    fairly low RCS for a plane its size.

    and replace the engines with newer ones ofcourse.

    Arms: taurus, mjoelnir, boeing-alcm, scalp, brahmos, paveway4,
    WCMDs, jdams, popeye-turbo.

    EW: 2t of payload for the latest and greatest.

    in reply to: "vayu Shakti'04" #2664489
    Indian1973
    Participant

    delete the initial post, that will take of it.

    Indian1973
    Participant

    I believe all entries failed. the last dropping out in 4 hrs. saw a
    photo of a motorcycle that fell right in the starting line – what a dawg!

    Robot car race ends in tears
    Andrew Bridges in Barstow, California
    MARCH 15, 2004

    ALL 15 self-navigating vehicles in a 150-mile race across the Mojave Desert were knocked out within a few miles of the starting gate Saturday, victims of technical glitches, barbed-wire fences and rugged terrain.

    None could claim the $US1 million prize offered by a military agency seeking to develop autonomous vehicles that could be used in combat.
    One of the early favorites, a military Humvee converted by Carnegie Mellon University students, managed to travel 7.4 miles before veering off course and snapping an axle during the race.

    “It was supposed to be challenging. We knew it would be challenging,” said Jan Walker, a spokeswoman for the Pentagon agency that sponsored the race. “We’re involved because it’s a technology we really need to push forward.”

    Officials foresee using computer-run, remote control-free robots to ferry supplies in war zones.

    The Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency spent $US13 million on the Grand Challenge. It estimates competitors laid out a total of four to five times that amount developing their entries, which rely on global positioning satellites as well as a variety of sensors, lasers, radar and cameras to orient themselves and detect and avoid obstacles.

    Most of the vehicles Saturday made it less than a mile before stalling, overturning or running off course. One six-wheeled robot built by a Louisiana team was disqualified after it became entangled in barbed wire. Others crashed seconds after starting.

    “It’s a tough challenge — it’s a grand challenge — you can always bet that it’s not doable. But if you don’t push the limits, you can’t learn,” Ensco engineer Venkatesh Vasudevan said shortly after his company’s entry rolled onto its side several hundred yards from the starting gate.

    The Pentagon’s research and development agency would have awarded $US1 million to the first team whose microcircuit-studded vehicle could cover the course in less than 10 hours, but most involved in the race were skeptical that any vehicle entered would accomplish the mission.

    The teams were given a map of the course two hours before the start. It included hundreds of waypoints marked by precise coordinates. Team members were not allowed to steer or touch the robots.

    Carnegie Mellon’s Humvee was the first to set out on the brush-and-boulder-dotted course just after dawn. It took off at a fast clip. Within 15 minutes, the vehicle dubbed Sandstorm had covered about seven miles over mostly flat desert, but it stalled near the tiny town of Daggett.

    The race was over in about four hours after the final competitors were disabled. Competitors suffered a variety of problems, including stuck brakes and malfunctioning satellite-navigation equipment.

    Virginia Tech’s converted golf cart failed within 100 yards of the starting line when its brakes seized up. It was driven off the course by 23-year-old senior Nick Elder.

    “Our vehicle knew where to go, but our brakes were holding us back,” said the disappointed Elder.

    Twenty-one teams attempted to qualify in trials earlier this week, but just seven completed a flat, 1.36-mile obstacle course at the California Speedway in Fontana, east of Los Angeles. Some teams were allowed to compete Saturday without finishing the obstacle course.

    The on- and off-road course, which began in Barstow, was to have ended just across the California line in Primm, Nevada. With no entries finishing, the agency could host another contest, probably in 2006.

    One competitor said the goal wasn’t necessarily to complete the race.

    “From my opinion, it’s always been a question of how far you can get,” said Palos Verdes High School sophomore Kevin Webb, 16.

    Their entry, a modified Acura SUV, hit a barrier shortly after crossing the starting line.

    The Associated Press

Viewing 15 posts - 1,456 through 1,470 (of 1,845 total)