dark light

Indian1973

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1,471 through 1,485 (of 1,845 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Indian Defence News thread #2664520
    Indian1973
    Participant

    Sharmaji
    * UAVs can fly over the CAS area or slightly behind not deep. this is not afghanistan with no enemy AF! this kind of rules out working with LACMs.

    2 M2Ks topping up
    http://cache.gettyimages.com/comp/3084313.jpg?x=x&dasite=MS_GINS&ef=2&ev=1&dareq=DF5280521401DF34F5FBEE96689EB26D

    Jag releases cluster
    http://cache.gettyimages.com/comp/3084329.jpg?x=x&dasite=MS_GINS&ef=2&ev=1&dareq=DF5280521401DF343FCE90095BF036E1

    4 Jags come in for a bombing run (but 3 look like naval strike IMs!)
    http://cache.gettyimages.com/comp/3084333.jpg?x=x&dasite=MS_GINS&ef=2&ev=1&dareq=DF5280521401DF34690E88B83922697D

    mebbe thats how the upg Jags look coz I hear the ferranti laser range finder in nose maybe removed.

    in reply to: AASM #2664536
    Indian1973
    Participant

    cool…whats the expected unit price for the kit ?

    in reply to: Indian Defence News thread #2664539
    Indian1973
    Participant

    http://www.newkerala.com/news-daily/news/features.php?action=fullnews&id=6983

    Pokhran (Rajasthan), Mar 14 (IANS) :

    The Indian Air Force (IAF) Sunday demonstrated its vast array of fighting machines and their devastating firepower.

    The IAF’s largest air-to-ground testing range here, on the eastern fringes of the Thar Desert, was the stage for the demonstration.

    Christened Vayu Shakti 2004, the air show started with two MiG-29s flying by the grandstand at supersonic speed, breaking the sound barrier with a deafening sonic boom.


    The audience was also urged to give their “best smiles” as two MiG-27 photoreconnaissance aircraft flew past at high speed.
    😉

    Also present to witness IAF’s capabilities were defence attaches from a number of foreign countries.

    The firepower demonstration was conducted after a gap of five years.

    The IAF chief, Air Chief Marshal S. Krishnaswamy, said this was due to various exercises conducted with the other armed forces, as also Operation Parakram, the mobilisation ordered in the aftermath of December 2002 attack on the Indian parliament.

    A solo low-level aerobatic exhibition by the Russian-made Sukhoi-30MKI, IAF’s most lethal weapon, enthralled the audience with its high speed, awe-inspiring manoeuvres.

    Even as the audience appreciated the impressive air show, a newly acquired Israeli-made Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) was orbiting the Pokhran range at a height of 15,000 feet, supplying combat aircraft with pictures of targets they were listed to strike.

    The planes participating in Sunday’s air show were mostly from the neighbouring air bases of Jaisalmer, Chandan and Bikaner in Rajasthan.

    Two Sukhoi-30 interceptors next unleashed their air-to-air missile armoury as flare bombs dropped from 12,000 feet. The flares helped guide the aircraft’s heat-seeking missiles.

    The audience was then treated by IAF’s frontline combat aircraft’s attacks on simulated targets constructed around the range.

    Jaguars led the way with two of them unleashing BL-755 cluster bombs on a mock petroleum installation.

    On impact, detonation from each casing of the 147 bomblets exploded into 2,000 bits of shrapnel, lethal to both personnel and vehicles.

    Two MiG-21BIS aircraft, assigned to hit a blast pen, or hardened shelters for planes, narrowly missed the target.

    Krishnaswamy attributed this miss to the use of conventional drop away S-24 bombs.

    “Precision guided bombs are always better than the conventional ones as they hit the target for sure,” Krishnaswamy said.

    As if to make up for this, an upgraded MiG-21 Bison scored a bulls eye.

    “We keep lamenting over MiG-21s, but the Bison hit the target successfully,” Krishnaswamy exulted.

    The air chief said that on the whole, he was happy with the show put up by his men.

    “I’m happy as all those who participated today are young fliers,” he said.

    The show also included an attack on enemy battle tanks by MI-35 attack helicopters and two MI-17 dropping an army commando unit in the war theatre.

    Adding a little twist from the routine target practice, Krishnaswamy ordered a Su-30MKI to hit an earlier undesignated target.

    To his relief, and to the joy of the audience, the air superiority aircraft destroyed the target successfully in a single strike.
    (wonder what it was air or ground?)

    Suryakirans, IAF’s acclaimed aerobatics team, held the audience spellbound as they executed one manoeuvre after another.

    The aerobatic team painted the sky with the colours of the Indian national flag as it flew around the grandstand.

    India’s newly acquired Il-78 mid-air refueller also took part in the show, topping up two Mirage 2000s that plugged into it.

    in reply to: Indian Defence News thread #2664544
    Indian1973
    Participant

    as per other reports 2 upgraded Jags and 2 upg Mig27s have
    been flying since 4th Qtr of 2003 to complete the testing before
    bulk upg starts. it looks like one of these released the LGB which
    the searcher2 was lasing for.

    http://www.deccanherald.com/deccanherald/mar142004/i4.asp

    MiG-27s turn night eagles

    By BIDANDA M CHENGAPPA
    DH News Service, BANGALORE:

    The Indian Air Force’s (IAF) MiG-27 fighter aircraft will now have night attack capability after an avionics upgrade, besides superior navigation systems and an improved targetting accuracy, thanks to the success of a Bangalore- based avionics unit of the Defence Research and Development Organisation (DRDO).

    For the first time, such a full-fledged avionics upgrade has been indigenously undertaken by a two dozen strong team, according to air force sources.

    The work comprised systems design and integration that adhered to the two-year project schedule —minus time overruns normally associated with the DRDO.

    DRDO bagged the contract which might have gone either to the Russians or Israelis and spent only Rs 20-22 crore. Apart from lower initial costs that foreign vendors offer for such projects, the catch lies in higher life cycle costs subsequently. Foreign vendors have a ‘captive’ client whose weapon system uses foreign equipment/systems manufactured in their countries and hence gives them an upper hand in price negotiations.

    The avionics upgrade involves interfacing new Israeli systems like forward looking infra- red, headup display, video recording system and digital map generator.

    Besides, French equipment that includes inertial navigation system aided by global positioning systems, multi-function display and laser ranger marked target seeker with older Russian systems like auto pilot, crash data recorder and armament control system.

    Significantly the re-usability of software and hardware that drives the core avionics computer is a spin-off. For instance, this core avionics computer has partially been used in the Jaguar aircraft and subsequently proposed for the MiG- 29. The MiG-27 avionics project itself was a spin-off from the Sukhoi- 30 MKI avionics upgrade.

    This drastically reduces the manhours on research and development and money saved for future avionics upgrade and can be done at a fraction of the cost.

    The upgraded MiG-27 enhances the IAF’s operational capability and successfully engage targets with ease. The ‘circular error of probability’ in firing/bombing is reduced due to better weapon aiming computations and increased navigational accuracy. Considering that the IAF has six MiG-27 fighter aircraft squadrons this avionics upgrade is a ‘force multiplier’ in airpower terms.

    For air force commanders, superior avionics means that only five MiG-27 aircraft would undertake an offensive mission rather than 10 aircraft due to higher chances of success.

    The MiG-27 also undertakes photo reconnaissance missions.
    (I didnt know that)

    in reply to: Indian Defence News thread #2664547
    Indian1973
    Participant

    http://us.rediff.com/news/2004/mar/14iaf.htm?headline=Indian~Air~Force~showcases~its~best

    large 60 a/c firepower exercise in pokhran desert


    Two other aircraft made their first appearance at the airshow, the Mig-21 Bison and the Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV).


    The UAV, which was present 15,000 feet above the ground throughout the exercise, photographed the entire proceedings and laser-designated a target for a Mig-27 aircraft, which took it out with a precision strike.

    😉

    in reply to: Indian Defence News thread #2664551
    Indian1973
    Participant

    Israeli firm bags avionics order for 200 Dhruv helicopters

    meantime I have seen a video of the existing “non-glass” cockpit.
    it has a large LCD in center for TV/FLIR. I think its for the navy
    version.

    Israeli firm bags HAL order
    Bangalore, March 14. (PTI): An Israeli company has bagged a $33 million contract from Hindustan Aeronautics Limited to develop and deliver advanced avionics system for 200 “Dhruv”, the Advanced Light Helicopters.

    The company, Israel Aircraft Industries (IAI), signed the deal last month.

    The advanced avionics system or the glass cockpit would have among others a comprehensive electronic warfare package, a day and night vision system, modern head up display and communication systems which will be specifically designed for the Indian armed forces.

    “The time frame for the development of the glass cockpit is about 18 months and they will be integrated in about 200 Dhruvs,” a Defence Ministry source said.

    in reply to: Indian Defence News thread #2664561
    Indian1973
    Participant

    from The Hindu newspaper.

    Hawk deal may be signed tomorrow: Fernandes
    Bangalore, March. 14 (PTI): Defence Minister George Fernandes, today indicated that the final agreement to buy 66 Hawk Advanced Jet Trainer aircraft from British Aerospace is likely to be signed tomorrow.

    “….today being Sunday, it may not have been signed. In all likelihood, it should be signed tomorrow,” Fernandes told reporters here this evening.

    The government had late last year cleared the purchase of 66 Hawk 115Y trainer jets from British Aerospace, a fleet that will, for the first time, help IAF pilots bridge the gap between subsonic and supersonic aircraft.

    The deal involves outright purchase of 24 aircraft, with the remaining 42 to be manufactured by HAL under license at Bangalore.

    in reply to: Pak-Saudi joint missile-nuclear agreement. #2665890
    Indian1973
    Participant

    I was just responding to others posts. ok wont post more on indian bm’s here.

    in reply to: Pakistan Tests Shaheen II #2665909
    Indian1973
    Participant

    everyone is burrowing deep now. india has also completed a
    national command bunker near the PMs residence in delhi and
    another one somewhere outside per media reports.

    I plan to start a company marketing shovels and anti-radiation pills. Sounds like growth industry 😀

    in reply to: Pak-Saudi joint missile-nuclear agreement. #2665916
    Indian1973
    Participant

    Surya is a myth propagated by the US non-prolif establishment to justify sanctions on India.

    In reality India will probably not create anything longer ranged
    than the Agni-III (~4000@1t payload) which will cover China
    –for the the time being. To deepen economic engagement with the EU/US,India has “decided” to keep the radiated threat low and not target the EU/US homeland needlessly.

    improvements like faster re-entry vehicles , better guidance,
    smaller devices, MIRVs would be made on existing platforms as
    need be.

    Sagarika, Koral seem to be covers for the Brahmos which is now
    out in the open.

    another myth is that cryogenic engines as used in launching GEO
    sats can be used in ICBMs. sure in liquid fuelled ICBMs of the 1950s that took hours to prepare for launch at fixed sites. India has a no-first-use policy hence anything other than road/rail mobile solid-fuel IRBM is suicidal. india is not suicidal if anyone has been sleeping.

    ISROs space rockets take months to build, weeks to prepare for
    launch and only two launchpads exist. So all this cryogenic==ICBM stuff was all created by non-prolif types to justify sanctions on india.

    in reply to: Pakistan Tests Shaheen II #2665931
    Indian1973
    Participant

    Groo, I think you are overestimating by a huge margin. india, pak, china, israel neither of them has any ability to do realtime surveillance of suspected missile sites deep inside the potential launching country AND early warning sats to provide warning of missile launches. Arrow2 depends on US sats for early warning.

    all they have to do is build a bunch of road mobile solid-fuel missiles and disappear the TELs into the undergrowth.

    and none of these can bear the loss of their Top5 cities taking with them 80% of the countrys best manpower.

    So I really think 50 ought to be enough.

    But China has to threaten the US to gain some leverage of
    the taiwan issue, so their numerical needs are much higher.

    Shaheen2 doesnt change the equation for India. even the Hatf2
    could reach mumbai and delhi,so well just another tool in the pile.

    It introduces a new element into mideast politics though. for the first time, the islamic world has a weapon+nuke that the west/israel has no answer for (cannot be shot down like a a/c).

    the arrow2 maybe able to take out the saddam scuds but the
    new IRBMs are really fast and hard to deal with. P(k) will be low.

    in reply to: Pakistan Tests Shaheen II #2666178
    Indian1973
    Participant

    matt, I didnt write it. one of the authors yosef bodansky wrote
    a book on bin laden iirc.

    I dont think its very significant though, the powers-that-be in
    the West have known of this long back if yosef knows related stuff and have simply decided to live with it and sweep it under carpet – perhaps giving an assurance not to do a iraq on the saudis in exchange for promises not to proliferate further and
    some help with capturing al-qaeda fugitives plus cracking down on wealthy saudi donors of terror charities.

    welcome to the real world. nothing is white or black and everything is negotiable.

    I wouldnt blame the saudis for doing it, quite clearly the US is
    withdrawing from its embrace and they need a security guarantor for the future. Pak-China combine will be that entity.

    Expect to see PLAN bases at mouth of Gulf leased from Saudi
    in a decade or so. ostensibly to foster peace in the high seas
    and safeguard its oil SLOC.

    in reply to: Pakistan Tests Shaheen II #2666210
    Indian1973
    Participant

    Defense & Foreign Affairs’ Strategic Policy
    October, 2003

    SECTION: NUCLEAR STRATEGY; Pg. 4
    LENGTH: 2581 words

    HEADLINE: A New Nuclear Age; Pakistan’s Accord to Place Nuclear Weapons and Long-Range Missiles in Saudi Arabia Places European and Indian Targets Within Reach

    BYLINE: By Yossef Bodansky and Gregory R. Copley

    PAKISTAN HAS REACHED A secret but definitive agreement to station nuclear weapons on Saudi soil, fitted to a new generation of Chinese (PRC)-supplied long-range (4,000 to 5,000km) ballistic missiles which would be under Pakistani command, but clearly with some form of joint Saudi-Pakistani command and control.

    The new systems would be able to reach European and Indian targets, increasing Saudi political influence in Europe and giving Pakistan the strategic depth it needs to have a second-strike capability against Indian nuclear capabilities. This radically changes the balance of power in South Asia.

    Highly-reliable Defense & Foreign Affairs Daily sources in Islamabad and Riyadh reported on October 21, 2003, that Saudi Arabia’s effective ruler, Crown Prince and Deputy Prime Minister ‘Abdallah bin ‘Abd al-‘Aziz al Sa’ud, reached the agreement with Pakistan Pres. Pervez Musharraf and Pakistani Prime Minister Mir Zafarullah Jamali during the visit of the Saudi delegation to Pakistan October 18-20, 2003.

    The agreement is the culmination of a long and sustained series of Saudi requests to Pakistan. A significant, unreported one-on-one meeting between Pres. Musharraf and Crown Prince ‘Abdallah in Kuala Lumpur, at the Organization for Islamic Conference (OIC) on October 15, 2003, was also significant in the process.

    It was clearly the fact that the Saudi basing would give Pakistan the capability to credibly deter an Indian nuclear or conventional attack on Pakistan which was the decisive element for the Pakistani leadership. Pakistan’s domestically-based nuclear capability is insufficient to deter the threat even of an overwhelming Indian military thrust into the country. However, the basing of an IRBM capability, with nuclear weapons, in Saudi Arabia, adds a complex second-strike capability to Pakistan’s deterrence and bargaining power with India.

    Pakistani Prime Minister Mir Zafarullah Jamali arrived in Tehran on October 21, 2003, for a three-day visit, ostensibly about trade, but the Pakistani Government wished to use the visit to explain the Saudi-Pakistani deal with Iranian officials, in order to ensure that Iran did not see the new arrangement as a threat to Iran. Iran is conscious of the fact that the 1987 Saudi CSS-2 acquisition was specifically designed to deter Iranian attacks on Saudi Arabia.


    It was understood that, under the Saudi-Pakistani pact, the nuclear weapons deployed to Saudi Arabia would remain as Pakistani systems, and the new series of ballistic missiles — which would replace the existing Saudi CSS-2 missiles (2,800km+ range), provided by the PRC and based on the DF-3A — would be paid-for by Saudi Arabia while being marked as Pakistani systems.
    The new systems would have a range of at least 4,000km and possibly 5,000km.

    Saudi Arabia acquired its CSS-2s in 1987, principally to counter potential threats from Iran. The Saudi systems, which were obsolescent even then, were fitted with conventional warheads, although it was believed that Saudi Arabia had developed chemical and/or biological warhead capabilities for the missiles. The Royal Saudi Air Force (Al Quwwat al Jawwiya al Malakiya as Sa’udiya) operates a total of 50 CSS-2 IRBMs, in two squadrons; one at al-Joffer, the other at Sulayel (the principal missile base). The CSS-2 is a road-transportable, liquid-fueled IRBM, and can be launched from either permanent launch pads or from portable launch stands, although the RSAF approach appears to be to base the systems at fixed sites.

    It was understood that the new systems would replace the CSS-2s at al-Joffer and Sulayel. Ideally, according to the sources, the new systems would be solid-fuel missiles, although it was possible that a derivative of the DF-4 liquid-fueled system (4,750km range) could be obtained, surplus from PRC stocks as an interim measure. The DF-4 operates from fixed bases. No specific timetable was put on the proposed new deployment of Pakistani strategic systems in Saudi Arabia, but a DF-4 acquisition option could make the plan operational within a very short timeframe.

    In about February 2002, Saudi workers began a major expansion program at Sulayel. By early March 2002, there were significant numbers of new buildings and fortified storage facilities. New facilities were also built at the nearby King Khalid Military City, to support the Sulayel expansion. New launch pads were created and, significantly, new fortified storage facilities were built for missiles which would be longer than the CSS-2s currently in service. Two underground facilities were also noted.


    The implication of the Saudi-Pakistani deal is that it (a) gives Saudi Arabia more credibility and leverage in dealing with European states and the US; and (b) makes Saudi Arabia now a part of the threat matrix for India.

    It was no coincidence that, during the three-day Saudi visit to Pakistan, Saudi Foreign Minister Prince Sa’ud al-Faisal bin Abd al-Aziz Al-Sa’ud said in Islamabad on October 19, 2003, that Indian-Israel military co-operation was a “worrying element” which could unleash instability and an arms race in the region. Speaking at a joint news conference with Pakistani Foreign Minister Khurshid Mehmood Kasuri, he addressed the recently-concluded defense supply agreement in Delhi among India, Israel and Russia, Prince Sa’ud said: “Indeed what we are hearing of this cooperation (Indo-Israel deal) is that it is aimed not at the good of the region, but to inflame the region, to further add to the arms race in the region.” In the same context, he recalled how some Israeli think tanks demonstrated “similar sinister designs” in the Middle East concerning the “security of Israel”. He observed: “It is a country of four-million or so people that believes its security extends from the Indus River to the Atlantic Ocean.”

    THE SAUDI mission to Islamabad — the first at this level since the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks on the US — demonstrated the extent of concern which the Saudi leadership felt about the India-Israel strategic relations which had also blossomed since 2001.

    The Saudi Crown Prince held talks with Gen. Musharraf and Prime Minister Mir Zafarullah Jamali, and Pakistani official sources said that the visit was as a result of an invitation delivered to the Crown Prince recently by Pres. Musharraf’s special envoy. However, Saudi sources said that the visit was as much a result of Saudi wishes as Pakistani. The visit also resulted in a complete harmony of expressed views on all common foreign policy issues — including whether Pakistan should, or should not, supply peace-keepers to Iraq [the consensus was to wait for an Iraqi invitation] — and a statement that Saudi economic aid to Pakistan would increase from $ 65-million to $ 100-million a year “as a token of its appreciation for Pakistan’s impressive economic performance over the last four years”.

    Crown Prince ‘Abdullah on October 19, 2003, visited an exhibition of defense equipment in Islamabad, and was accompanied by the Pakistani President and Prime Minister. The extensive display and demonstrations were not, according to Pakistani sources, just for show. There was a direct interest by Saudi Arabia in Pakistani-built systems.


    Significantly, however, there were now routine cooperative exercises underway between RSAF and Pakistan Air Force (PAF) units in joint asset protection — air defense — deployments. These, too, were not “routine”, and were, according to sources, aimed at developing joint capabilities to defend the proposed new strategic missile facilities in Saudi Arabia.

    Saudi-Pakistani nuclear weapons planning and cooperation has been underway for some years, but it had always been felt that Pakistani officials were resisting pressure from Riyadh to provide actual weapons to Saudi Arabia. [Even now, the formula addresses Saudi needs, but keeps the weapons in Pakistani hands, at least nominally and for some purposes.] However, the trail of events makes it clear that Saudi Arabia had consistently worked toward the acquisition of a nuclear capability, provided by Pakistan.

    On May 6-7, 1999, then-Pakistan Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif escorted Saudi Minister of Defense & Aviation Prince Sultan bin ‘Abd al-Aziz al-Saud on a visit to Pakistani nuclear research facilities and the manufacturing facilities for the Ghauri liquid-fueled strategic ballistic missile (a derivative of the DPRK NoDong-1) in Kahuta. This was the first and only visit by a foreign dignitary to the facilities, and only the third by a Pakistani head-of-government. The host was Dr Abdul Qadir Khan, at that time regarded as the “father” of the Pakistani nuclear capability. Prince Sultan at this time was known to have engaged in what were described by sources as “very substantive” discussions with Pakistani officials for the acquisition of both nuclear weapons and Ghauri MRBMs.

    The Ghauri, with a range of only some 2,600km, was later to be by-passed, partly because of the range question; partly because it was liquid-fueled and not solid-fueled; and partly because of problems with the NoDong-1s being faced by its originator, the DPRK. Pakistani sources have said, however, that the Ghauri derivatives were likely to resume and were still viable.

    Prince Sultan’s visit to Pakistan was followed by a visit to Saudi Arabia in mid-September 2000 by a Pakistani strategic policy and nuclear delegation led by Dr Abdul Qadir Khan, Dr Ijaz Shafi Ghilani and Dr M. Younus But. They were guests of Prince Sultan, and at a speech on about September 20, 2000, Dr Abdul Qadir Khan thanked the Saudi Government for contributing to the success of the Pakistani nuclear weapons tests on May 28, 1998. That indicated a Saudi involvement in the Pakistani nuclear weapons program much earlier than Pakistani officials have generally acknowledged. [Saudi financial support for Pakistani nuclear research was, however, assumed even during the Zia ul-Haq era of the 1980s, but without any known understanding of a direct quid pro quo for Saudi Arabia.]

    On October 15, 2003, Pres. Musharraf met in Kuala Lumpur with Crown Prince ‘Abdallah at the Organization of Islamic Conference (OIC). The meeting was not reported, and was a one-on-one affair. That night, Pres. Musharraf met with a number of Pakistani officials and Pakistani expatriates, including a number of scientists who had come especially to Kuala Lumpur from China. One Defense & Foreign Affairs source made notes of Pres. Musharraf’s remarks, which were not reported, and which were deemed to be private.

    The source, who made the notes available to Defense & Foreign Affairs, noted that the President said that he was encouraged and optimistic and that Pakistan was about to spread its wings on the world stage. He said that the world was looking for a role for Pakistan, and that it could contribute something which nobody else could. He said that Pakistan was at a crossroads and that it could decide whether it would accept this challenge for the ummah (Islamic world) and Islam.

    in reply to: Python 6 #2666482
    Indian1973
    Participant

    Egyptian F-16s maybe.

    and a good AAM can be a lucrative export item. every AF needs atleast a IR AAM. political problems and conditions make buying IRIS-T , Asraam and AIM9X difficult for many nations. that leaves R-73xy, Python and Mica-IR as the remaining.

    in reply to: Best Air Launched Anti-Shipping Missiles #2666491
    Indian1973
    Participant

    I got the idea from Bush’s faith-based-initiatives 🙂

Viewing 15 posts - 1,471 through 1,485 (of 1,845 total)