dark light

Derekf

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1,246 through 1,260 (of 1,281 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: XH558 comes home ! #1060166
    Derekf
    Participant

    Well that’s good for those that knew. I just wish it been more widely publicized and more might have seen it.

    in reply to: XH558 comes home ! #1060175
    Derekf
    Participant

    I take it this was a flypast for those “in the know”. I thought it might come this way en-route to Southport but could find out nothing at all. Why was it so difficult to find out its routing?
    I would loved to have seen it fly over the place I worked for 23 years but sadly no. Again.
    Funny way of trying to get public support.

    in reply to: Southport Saturday #483097
    Derekf
    Participant

    Many thanks for the kind comments folks. They are appreciated.

    in reply to: General Discussion #237685
    Derekf
    Participant

    I would suggest that even if anyone does know, they are unlikely to say so here.

    in reply to: spooks #1834965
    Derekf
    Participant

    I would suggest that even if anyone does know, they are unlikely to say so here.

    in reply to: General Discussion #237700
    Derekf
    Participant

    You can scoff all you like but she is still considerably more famous and richer than any of us will ever be.
    Not my kind of music but that doesn’t alter the fact than many people enjoy her music.

    I think perhaps the GD section should be named for these.

    http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v609/CMVH/oldgits.jpg

    in reply to: Oh No! I’m being Mobbed by my Fans! #1835001
    Derekf
    Participant

    You can scoff all you like but she is still considerably more famous and richer than any of us will ever be.
    Not my kind of music but that doesn’t alter the fact than many people enjoy her music.

    I think perhaps the GD section should be named for these.

    http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v609/CMVH/oldgits.jpg

    in reply to: General Discussion #238328
    Derekf
    Participant

    Indiaecho is right. How on earth could we encourage anyone to represent the people if we we reward them so little.

    Those nominating them to a seat have the say over that.

    To be nominated you have to put yourself forward. Why would you do that if you couldn’t afford to?

    Perhaps the OP would care to answer the point that paying MPs nothing would mean that only the well-off would become MPs. Is that really what you want?

    in reply to: Do you think????????????? #1835359
    Derekf
    Participant

    Indiaecho is right. How on earth could we encourage anyone to represent the people if we we reward them so little.

    Those nominating them to a seat have the say over that.

    To be nominated you have to put yourself forward. Why would you do that if you couldn’t afford to?

    Perhaps the OP would care to answer the point that paying MPs nothing would mean that only the well-off would become MPs. Is that really what you want?

    in reply to: Avro 698 Vulcan 60th #1071033
    Derekf
    Participant

    Exactly, I even wondered if I had the date wrong!

    At the very least I would think that XH558 would have done a fly through at Woodford, and even Scampton, Coningsby, Cottesmore, and Waddington.
    After all, isn’t that one of the reasons it flys, to commemorate the engineering skills that created it, and the service use of the type?

    Not much point in flying over Woodford anymore. Not much left there now.

    in reply to: General Discussion #238336
    Derekf
    Participant

    Good idea. That way the only people who could afford to become MPs would be the idle rich. A bit like the 18th century then. :rolleyes:

    What we should do is pay MPs enough so they could concentrate on being Mps and not have sidelines.

    in reply to: Do you think????????????? #1835374
    Derekf
    Participant

    Good idea. That way the only people who could afford to become MPs would be the idle rich. A bit like the 18th century then. :rolleyes:

    What we should do is pay MPs enough so they could concentrate on being Mps and not have sidelines.

    in reply to: General Discussion #238342
    Derekf
    Participant

    Your original point.

    A regular occurence (sic) in news reports is that they think a stall is an engine malfunction.

    All I said was that it is an engine malfunction and that you were wrong. That’s all.

    I wasn’t aware this thread was an aviation dictonary. (sic)

    Well quite.

    in reply to: Media aviation howlers #1835379
    Derekf
    Participant

    Your original point.

    A regular occurence (sic) in news reports is that they think a stall is an engine malfunction.

    All I said was that it is an engine malfunction and that you were wrong. That’s all.

    I wasn’t aware this thread was an aviation dictonary. (sic)

    Well quite.

    in reply to: General Discussion #238347
    Derekf
    Participant

    Oh OK. All I was doing was pointing out that something someone said was lacking in accuracy. If accuracy is not what this forum is interested in, then fair enough.
    A compressor stall what it is called and it is often what causes a surge. I’ve experienced a few and am well aware of what causes them.

    Why the jibe about the “real world”? What are you implying with that remark?

Viewing 15 posts - 1,246 through 1,260 (of 1,281 total)