Thanks Blue_2 good work – the old girl is coming along steadily.
It is a sorry thing to see that an honorable man like McCain is regarded with such deep disrespect by some people simply because he did the right thing and displayed his repugnance at the lack of honesty, morality and civilised values that now exists in the Republican Party at its upper levels. Vale John McCain I may not have agreed with everything you said but you were a man who earned respect.
Indeed sad news – there far too few people of his calibre in Washington at the moment.
AAAAHHHH!!! At last my weekly fix – more good work Blue_2, thanks.
Every little bit done is a further step forward – good work.
Yes it was a disappointment – what was the cause.
Keep up the good work Blue_2. My favourite thread.
Very useful – good news.
Interesting pic. I think the chap in front with his back to us and his hands in his pocket is saying to the other “So far so good – the passengers haven’t noticed something’s missing. Now if it clears the trees at the end of the paddock we’re home and hosed“
It’s been well discussed here in the past – pages and pages.
It’s quite obvious that despite all the claimed certainty that TIGHAR feed to the media TIGHAR recognises that the sceptics quite rightly far outnumber the believers. If TIGHAR want to use credible in its strict meaning then they have to admit that no credible historical organization accepts the Gardner hypothesis as proved, which is precisely why they keep adding more speculative claims to those already made. In fact the plain unvarnished fact is that as even their name TIGHAR is deceptive then what benefit can another round of speculative amateur science provide.
For example read the latest discussion of the bones on the Aviation Mysteries website (from page 27 onwards) which has failed to produce any response from TIGHAR – yet those bones are the central plank of their hypothesis. The discussion raises some very important evidence that rebuts the TIGHAR claim yet they continue to pretend it doesn’t exist. If there was certainty in their argument they would have leapt onto the discussion and comprehensively refuted the points raised – they haven’t so what does that tell us.
Now that’ll be impressive.
Give them time …..
Thanks for the detailed explanation Rich, I can only say that I am very impressed by the team’s ongoing effort and I am finding this exercise both entertaining and informative. Keep up the fine job.
Credible radio messages are the ones that support the Gardner Island theory – non-credible are the ones that don’t. Good grief man hasn’t the message sunk in yet. 😀