dark light

Malcolm McKay

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 571 through 585 (of 1,462 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: A session with a grand old lady #917120
    Malcolm McKay
    Participant

    Thanks for posting those – she is beautiful.

    in reply to: Manston to close on the 15th May #923981
    Malcolm McKay
    Participant

    I thought onshore farms had been stopped…….

    They were but the tractor drivers were drowning at an alarming rate.

    in reply to: Mk.I Spitfire restorations #926831
    Malcolm McKay
    Participant

    I suggest you buy Andy Saunders’ book on the subject of such a Spitfire rebuild Spitfire: MarkI P9374 . Andy used to be a member here and is missed. A wonderful and honest account – I recommend it thoroughly. Lots of parts replacement but the result is worth it.

    in reply to: Pink Spitfire question #928415
    Malcolm McKay
    Participant

    The recon MkIX – the FR IX?

    in reply to: Dambusters Remake Latest #931579
    Malcolm McKay
    Participant

    Yes that’s true – the 50s were a different time altogether.

    in reply to: Dambusters Remake Latest #931586
    Malcolm McKay
    Participant

    Yes it’s a bit like a fair treatment of Bader isn’t it. The real Gibson was not the stiff upper lip all business person depicted in the original film. I prefer my historical action movies to be as close to the truth as possible.

    in reply to: Perranporth Airfield Money Requested. #934077
    Malcolm McKay
    Participant

    Is anyone able to confirm a rumour that the owner of Perranporth Airfield has withdrawn his airfield from sale ?

    Oh SH*T 😀 That’s torn it.

    in reply to: Dambusters Remake Latest #934769
    Malcolm McKay
    Participant

    Yes, US Navy’s VFA-195. Currently fly the FA18 Super Hornet. They attacked a dam in North Korea in 1951 using torpedoes dropped from Skyraiders.

    Thanks David – IIRC also the menus for the celebratory dinner held by 617 squadron after the raid were printed with the title Damn Busters.

    in reply to: Dambusters Remake Latest #934868
    Malcolm McKay
    Participant

    All this talk of latter-day PC sensitivies reminded me (if my memory’s not playing tricks) that the 1954 film was promoted in the US as ‘The Dambusters’, not ‘The Dam Busters’, in case folks in the Bible Belt took offence on hearing the word ‘dam’. Can anyone confirm? These days, the single word ‘Dambusters’ seems to have become the standard way of referring not only to the film but 617 Squadron too.

    Isn’t there a USAF or USN squadron known as the Dambusters – a battle honour won in Korea IIRC.

    in reply to: Dambusters Remake Latest #935527
    Malcolm McKay
    Participant

    One wonders what the dramatic results would have been if Gibson had called the dog something else –

    The scene is that tense moment in the Ops Room while our chaps are going in to the bombing runs.

    The junior officer who answers the phone is waiting, Barnes-Wallis is waiting, assorted senior RAF officers are waiting and most importantly Arthur Harris is waiting right next to the phone.

    After several false alarms the phone rings, everyone hesitates for a moment.

    The junior office answers the phone and with a look of pure delight turns to Arthur Harris.

    “Snookums!!!!!!!”

    in reply to: Dambusters Remake Latest #935638
    Malcolm McKay
    Participant

    Dear me does all this talk about calling pets offensive names mean that I will have to stop calling my cat Fluffy ****.

    Malcolm McKay
    Participant

    Malcolm, I hadn’t honestly considered their home market; its obvious when you think about it! (There, we agreed on something; must be a good week).
    Bruce

    Well damn it all I must be getting silly in my dotage 😀

    You are right about the A and B team and it is unfortunate they have let the B team loose on British aircraft but then that was case for a long time with the Japanese kit makers who seemed to be unable to find anything else to release except US or German aircraft. How long for instance did it take to get such a simple thing as a decent Spitfire.

    in reply to: Is this a BF109? #936343
    Malcolm McKay
    Participant

    The tyre shape is reminiscent of a Me 262.

    Malcolm McKay
    Participant

    I dont understand the kit manufacturers at present – with the right designers, its possible to produce outstanding kits, but the far east firms seem to rush at it, use poor plans, don’t do their research, and end up with something that only loosely resembles the original.
    Bruce

    Simple really – they have a captive market of nearly 1.5 billion who haven’t any idea of Western European history nor any need or desire to learn it. I admit to disappointment about the kit. I had hoped that the trade fair pics were distorted by bad camera work and that the reality might be better however the manufacturers seem to have left out the entire upper rudder section not to mention other egregious faults. Still I await a comparison with decent plans – it may be fixable with some work. I did beat their Spiteful into shape.

    in reply to: B-24 Liberator Project In Australia – News #936464
    Malcolm McKay
    Participant

    Interesting stuff. That Liberator is really coming along.

Viewing 15 posts - 571 through 585 (of 1,462 total)