I have no idea. I think all subs look the same. Can anyone verify Z1pp0’s claim that the sub is from the Oyashio class?

LOL. I feel the same sometimes. Thats why I had the global security link before. You can compare the circles i placed in your picture and another one I found on the net.

From J33NElson

From Vessel And Ships Photo Gallery vspg.net(Japanese site)

From globalsecurity.org

Other Oyashio links:
wikipedia.org
A Korean blog

\Dan

So does this guy 😀

OMG!! HOUSE BANS GAY UNION!!! 😮

————————–
:diablo:

…
Here’s my predictions: once the F-15K and F-15SG production lines start to wind down, Boeing starts pushing the USAF to keep the F-15 line open with an order for jammers. …

Then I predict that USAF will want a two-seat F-35 with (possibly) tech from the F-18G. Comonality with the rest of the USAF F-35 fleet beeing the main reason. But that won’t be feasable untill the F-35 is in full rate production. BTW I think that no matter how good simulators are these days it is strange that no two seater is in sight.

Althoguh I do belive an EF-15 would be able to do the job better. Bigger, can carry more and more flexibel than a smaller platform.

\Dan

Like the Yak-38 the Yak-141 had lift engines not a lift fan………..:rolleyes:

So true! 😀 soz

\Dan

The aft nozzle clearly has influence from the Russian Yak-41. That said, I don’t remember it having a lift-fan like the F-35???? Which, is really what makes the Lightning superior to previous STOVL Types……….along with internal Fuel, Weapons, and Stealth!

Actuallt the Yak-141 have 2 lift fans. Just like the the Yak-38. But they don’t have a shaft connecting them to the main engine. They are independent and this has been quoted as the main reason for the claimed poor safty record for both types. Well see if and how the F-35B’s shaft driven lift-fan will be better or not.

Also AFAIK LM and Yakolev did some ‘reasearch’ together in the 90’s. Probably more of a deal for LM to get some (theoretical) experience with this configuration. The shaft-driven lift-fan configuration sertanly looks better on paper than the individual pairs. But is it? Time will tell! :diablo:

\Dan

…
The system Davide/Strales is compatible with all Oto 76/62 already sold

ok ty. 🙂

Considering the large empty space in front of the VLS, are there any plans for a larg caliber gun? Like a 127mm?

\Dan

…
Otomelara indicates backwards with all the 76/62 active in the world

What? I don’t understand what you mean. :confused:

\Dan

The Osprey will fly much higher and at greater range than a Sea King. So, why would you want to restrict its capabilities with the much smaller Cerberus Radar??? That would be like replacing F-16’s with F-15’s. Yet, keeping the smaller radar of the F-16’s! Clearly, you would want to take advantage of the size available and the benefits thereof. That is not to say the Cerbersu System is not a good Radar. Just the larger size of the Osprey can use its size to greater advantage………

So why are you cuoteing me? I never claimed that one radar was better than the other. :confused:

Generaly speaking anytime you put a radar on an aircraft you will try to maximize the antenna size. The circumstances are specific in each case. If you want the radar to be deployabel through the rear ramp and have some plug ‘n play… sorry ‘fight’ system then the limiting factor would be the ramp width.

\Dan