Boeing make aeroplanes for pilots, Airbus make aeroplanes for accountants. In years gone by fleet choices were made by pilots, these days that decision is made by accountants. Regrettably, Boeing have to change their philosophy in order to survive.
I know this thread is orientated at cabin crew uniforms bur the 2nd BA picture shows a BA franchise flight deck uniform rather than a BA uniform.
Personally I really like BA’s current uniform, much better than the deck chair they used to wear!
I wore 3 different cabin crew uniforms when I worked for Virgin but only really liked the one we wore from 91-97.
I’m one of very few people who really don’t like the current Tommy Cook uniform. I don’t like the girls waistcoats and particularly don’t think hosties in trousers suits the image. I definitely think Monarch clean up when it comes to girls and their uniforms.
regards
wys
PS is it just me or do easyJet cabin crew all look like scruffy council labourers in that uniform?
I think I’ll settle on the fact that it must be an acquired taste…however I’m glad I’ve tried it!
I wouldn’t put it past Ryanair to start reducing the number of toilets on board next.
ATC pal – that was the series of books I was reading about the Aeroflot crash in! There is now a 4th edition about propellor driven airliners. Very, very good set of books but you’ll need a good understanding of aviation to get the most from them.
regards
wys
I had my first taste of Foie Gras, Hand. Very interesting texture!
Thanks for that, I always wondered what those things were trying to do on the Citation!
Thanks Mark. In days of old, airways had beacons at each end and at various points along their length for aircraft to navigate by. With the advent of Inertial Reference Systems, Hyperbolic Navigation and Global Positioning Systems it is now possible to fly routes without reference to local beacons and this is referred to as RNAV (Remote Navigation, if my memory serves me well).
regards
wys
While I was on holiday I read a very interesting passage (I can’t remember the title of the book) about the Aeroflot A310 that crashed with the Captains 15 year old son at the controls a couple of years ago. I would have thought that would make a very different accident story to cover.
regards
wys
This is such backward thinking by the BAA. Surely it would be in their interest to create ultimate viewing areas where they could centralise viewing creating improved security and even generating a small revenue. As previously stated they are currently upsetting the people who are potentially their greatest security allies.
To become an airline pilot there is no necessity to hold any particular qualification other than passes in the Licensing Authorities exams (i.e. the ATPL ground and flight training). It is undeniably advantageous to have studied certain subjects, such as Maths and Physics to as high a level as possible before, purely because it will make the mathematical and scientific aspects of the course less demanding and more familiar when they appear. The actual level of mathematical skill required in the actual flightdeck is relatively low (although the ability to do a bit of mental arithmetic is a distinct advantage) and I wouldn’t be caught dead without a calculator in my breast pocket for checking loadsheets, etc! The best example of how people can succeed if they have the desire is a mate of mine who used to be a lorry driver for a dairy company in Sussex. He left school with no qualifications but a deep desire to fly. He bummed his way through the light aviation scene and managed to get a commercial license. He joined AirUK as a F27 FO working up to become a F100 Captain before leaving a few years ago to take up his present position as an A300 FO with Monarch.
The difference with this situation is that we are not talking about someone arranging their own training but a sponsorship. Now the entry requirements are those chosen by the sponsoring airline in order to provide an initial cut down in numbers from those that apply. The requirements they state are, however, just a a guide. For example, in the mid-80’s BA asked for A levels in Maths and Physics. My brother applied with A levels in English, French and Economics but that didn’t stop them from selecting him and turning him into the BA skipper he is today. Who knows what he would have been if he had read the advert to the letter of the law.
On the subject of A levels, I agree with both sides. Any individual is only as educated as his highest level of achievement. When studying for O levels (in my day) they seemed like the hardest thing ever and meant everything. However when I did my 3 A levels the O levels suddenly didn’t seem so important. If you go on to do a degree (something which will only be permitted due to the important A level results) it will be the degree that gets you a job in your desired field rather that your A levels themselves. Similarly Martin has used his GCSE and AS successes to get himself on a course that will provide him with the qualification that will employ him for life. Fortunately an ATPL is so highly revered that in the event of a lost medical I would hope that many employers would be prepared to put their faith in someone that has trained and worked to such a high standard. Training for an JAA ATPL is equivalent to completing a 3 or 4 year degree course in 1 year, which explains why the schools are now very choosy as to who they let join. They don’t want you to remortgage your house and waste tens of thousands of pounds if there really is no chance of success. That is in itself the sign of a responsible college and a big improvement on how the colleges were a few years ago.
I think my advice to all of you is to get yourself educated to at least A level standard (unless you have specific reason to do something else) as A levels are the starting point for proper educational recognition.
I have a view on applying for jobs that equates to education and employment –
A CV gets you an application form, the application form gets you an interview, the interview gets you the job. Each step is individual and it is rare to leapfrog a stage or two. For example, no proper job is ever given on the basis of an application form but only after a proper interview.
Similarly, GCSE’s let you decide which A levels to take, A levels let you qualify to a university for a degree, the degree is the qualification that turns you into a professional person. I can’t think of any profession where you become a professional with no higher qualification than A level.
Martin, It’s been quite a few years since I did my initial Class 1 and unfortunately I can’t remember a great deal about it. I gather that now they will do a full cholesterol check as part of the blood test but that shouldn’t trouble you like it bothers us oldies, the ‘cheese and wine’ brigade! Don’t let it worry you too much as there should be no problems at your age other than the hole it will leave in your wallet. I presume you are going down to the Belgrano for your check?
Thanks Andrew, I wasn’t aware there’s going to be a change. I’m sure it’s something to do with european harmonisation or something like that. It had to be time to change as we were all just getting used to how it was before!!!
Apologies for the lateness of this reply but I have been away on holiday, followed by a busy work pattern and a tax return to complete!
Matthew – your synopsis is generally correct but perhaps I can expand a bit on how the 757 system works. The 757 has 2 ground to air switch systems for signalling to different things. The reverse thrust system (and some other systems) have a sensor in the tilt mechanism on the main gear bogies. As soon as the bogies start to tilt on touchdown the thrust reverse system becomes available (as long as the thrust levers are moved to idle). Other systems (such as the stall warning and warning and caution systems) use a logic switch on the compression of the nose gear leg. This was the problem on the MYT 757 in Mahon the other month.
A further interesting bit of info – on the 757 (and presumably all jets with underslung wing engines) we only use reverse idle until the nosewheel is on the ground to avoid the reverse thrust rapidly pitching the aircraft nose down and damaging the nose gear. For a similar reason, any autobrake setting higher than setting 1 will not cut in until the body angle has lowered to +1 degree relative to the horizon.
RobC – Reverse thrust does indeed improve landing performance however when performance is being calculated reverse thrust is not taken into consideration (i.e. it is assumed to be unserviceable). Interestingly enough in the event of an engine failure it is still possible to use full reverse thrust on the remaining engine during thed landing roll commensurate with maintaining directional control.
regards
wys
Well spotted WD, I hadn’t noticed. On Boeings the reversers are locked closed until touchdown and presumably the same is true with Airbus. The only western aicraft I know hat was allowed to use reverse in flight was the Trident although I think it may be possible in the DC8 as well. Even so I wouldn’t want to use it in the flare as it would make you fall out of the sky.