dark light

wysiwyg

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 2,176 through 2,190 (of 3,331 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Aurigny turboprop fleet update #736600
    wysiwyg
    Participant

    Might just be a short term interim lease until the real second aircraft is ready.

    in reply to: Anyone seen this before ? #736604
    wysiwyg
    Participant

    Hopefully they included the 6 we couldn’t find when we left Seville!

    in reply to: Cathay Pacific help? #737969
    wysiwyg
    Participant

    You need SkyCruiser for this. He works for Cathay.

    in reply to: Accident at Leeds #738105
    wysiwyg
    Participant

    Originally posted by EGNM
    Leeds has and still can handle a/c up to B747 size.

    hmmmmn…well ok, if you consider reducing pax numbers massively and carrying limited fuel!

    in reply to: Emirates splashing the cash!! #738212
    wysiwyg
    Participant

    Yes I heard it was a large 777 order for Qatar.

    in reply to: BMI A321 Emergency #738258
    wysiwyg
    Participant

    Some people here have hit the nail right on the head as far as I’m concerned.

    Batbay – ‘Why fly through it?’ Exactly what I was thinking. It would seem to me that the flightcrew failed to use their weather radar properly to identify oncoming CB activity and were therefore masters of their own destiny.

    Kev35 – ‘Interesting that there are no pictures of the damage said to have been inflicted in the fuselage and wings.’ The damage to the radome and the crack in the windscreen appear to me to be largely cosmetic. What would bother me more is whether the leading edges of the wings containing the high lift devices (eg slats) would deploy for landing coupled with loss of lift due to dent induced misshapen leading edges. I can’t imagine the engine fan blades were too happy with their lot either!

    EGNM – ‘Stricken Holiday jet limps back into Manchester’, ‘Plummiting thousends of feet’ and ‘Thrown uncontrollably through the skies’. I’m with you on this about media reporting. I bet you that aircraft was never ‘uncontrollable’, never ‘plummiting’ (sic) and I’ve never seen an Airbus with a ‘limp’. Pathetic glitzing up for reader appeal yet completely missing the material that mattered. More useful as tommorrows chip wrapper than todays news journal!

    regards
    wys

    in reply to: A318 #738261
    wysiwyg
    Participant

    Yes cargo doors are smaller on the A318.

    in reply to: Emirates splashing the cash!! #738266
    wysiwyg
    Participant

    An inside source tells me to expect a big Qatar order/announcement in the next few weeks.

    in reply to: Best looking flight attendants #739614
    wysiwyg
    Participant

    I’ve recently been noticing that Monarch seem to be recruiting the most attractive cabin crew.

    in reply to: Embraer 170 Pic #740312
    wysiwyg
    Participant

    A perfect example (in miniature form) of what Boeing should have made the NG 737 into.

    in reply to: Aurigny turboprop fleet update #740334
    wysiwyg
    Participant

    Just discovered that the reason G-BMLC is going is because it has reached half its life and is due a very expensive overhaul.

    in reply to: Aurigny turboprop fleet update #740818
    wysiwyg
    Participant

    Don’t know anything about the Dinard or other Trislander routes. There should be a second Aurigny ATR72 coming over the winter to operate the MAN flights. Don’t know the Shed reg’s. One will stay in pax config while the other becomes a permanent freight dog. This info was straight from the flight ops department.

    I have just taken a look at the Virtual Aurigny website. It’s really quite impressive. The thing that had me thinking was – if I was into flight sim (which I’m not) and wanted to join as a Saab pilot, would I have to be a trainee pilot!

    regards
    wys

    in reply to: Motorists to use aviation fuel! #741247
    wysiwyg
    Participant

    I haven’t bought any Avgas for a few years but last time I did it cost a lot more than car petrol.

    in reply to: United speed record #741550
    wysiwyg
    Participant

    He would be cruising at between his normal operating mach number and MMo but he would have been travelling the bulk of the way down a huge jetstream to set these kinds of speeds.

    in reply to: More GCI Concerns – this time Flybe! #741799
    wysiwyg
    Participant

    Exactly. The only turbine that seems to endure the number of cycles are the various forms of PT6 (as in the shed, twotter, etc.).

Viewing 15 posts - 2,176 through 2,190 (of 3,331 total)