RE: The GE90-115B!
I read a report on this a couple of months back. If I remember rightly there is 9 inches clearance so they don’t start it up until they get lined up on the runway (otherwise too much foreign object ingestion while taxiing). They take off using the 3 original engines and the GE90 at idle otherwise the thrust would be too asymetric and unmanageable.
RE: Pic Of The Day-New AF confrence room!
Perhaps as well as ‘pic of the day’ we should also start doing caption contests. What do you think?
RE: Aurigny confirms the wet-lease of BAe146-200
Very interesting news. I hope it spurs the company on in that direction. However I worry that Aurigny are not aggressive enough in their marketing to sustain a 146 through the leaner periods.
You have to wonder whether this experience combined with a possible withdrawal by BA could mean that Aurigny are starting to think big.
RE: Boeing 727 Flies Into History !
I think they were just after a cheap way of getting some life out of some cheap to lease airframes for freight work.
RE: Pic Of The Day-New AF confrence room!
‘Air France find a new place to put striking pilots!’
RE: The GE90-115B!
No one has let Matthew Murray near this picture have they!!! 😉
RE: Quiz!
767-300 has a bumper but the 767-200 doesn’t.
757-300 has a bumper but the 757-200 doesn’t.
It sure looks like a bumper on that 727 although I didn’t know they were fitted to that type. I’ve also see 737-400’s and 800’s fitted with a different type of device which I’m told is a tail bumper.
On the 757-300 and 767-300 we have a fourth undercarriage green light which tells us if the tail bumper has deployed when the gear is selected down. We also get a message on the center screens if we touch the back end closely followed by a P45 in your pigeon hole. A properly flown rotation (according to Boeing) leaves just 12 inches between the ground and $85 million dollars of aeroplane!
RE: KLM and BUZZ and Air Lib Express.
I thought KLM had been looking at offloading Buzz for ages as it didn’t fit their business plan. I don’t think it would disappear, just continue independently.
RE: Two Airlines Apply For Cockpit Guns .
Yes absolutely. If the pilot is part of the plot you can forget it right from the start. He doesn’t need anyone else in the passenger cabin or even a gun. He can keep everyone else out already because of the new doors and all he has to do is bash the other guy over the bonce with the crash axe. So let’s put this one to bed.
On the subject of pyrotechnics. Andrew, If they can get pyro’s on board they can get their own weapons on board. You would prefer to be on a flight where if they breached the cockpit the flightcrew were unable to resist would you? Reread my earlier post – If the weapon is in the flightdeck at the start it can’t be used to gain entry. Your argument isn’t against a weapon in the flightdeck it’s a statement about locked doors.
RE: Boeing 727 Flies Into History !
It’s an interesting concept though. There was recently a plan in the States to put modern turbofans (GE90’s?) under the wings of old DC10’s and leave the normal unit in the tail position. The plan was to use all three to get airborne and then throttle back the number 2 and use it as an APU. I got this info from the former BCAL chief DC10 training captain.
RE: Hadj again!
[updated:LAST EDITED ON 24-01-03 AT 07:48Â AM (GMT)]Both of these are off to Beirut for a month to do a spot of Hadj work. It’s a wet lease just lasting a month so they won’t be gone for long. Don’t know if you remember me saying I was lying low because I didn’t want to go to Beirut? Well it turned out to just be an Airbus thing after all. Phew!
RE: Two Airlines Apply For Cockpit Guns .
If the weapon is on the flightdeck and the door is locked how can it be easily accessible to the potential hijacker???
If the hijacker has gained access to the cockpit it is obvious that their intentions are inappropriate so I think common sense says we need some means of being able to defend ourselves.
I believe the weapon whould be kept in a secure container on the glareshield (or similar) with an electronic lock. The lock should be released by pressing 2 buttons marked ‘access’ one located to the left of the captain one to the right of the FO. Operation of both switches unlocks the weapon. Next to each switch should be a button marked ‘deny’. If an intruder breaks in both pilots press access unlocking the weapon for use. If no one breaks in but a pilot is showing signs of instability, when he presses ‘access’ the other pilot does not, keeping the gun stowage locked. The other pilot then presses ‘deny’ locking the stowage permanently until the lock can be reset on the ground by engineers gaining access to the avionics bay.
RE: Boeing 727 Flies Into History !
Thanks everybody, this is really quite interesting. Isn’t that the same engine that was used in the F70 and F100? Was it used in anything else?
RE: Two Airlines Apply For Cockpit Guns .
But if they are in the locked flightdeck already they can’t be used to gain access. If someone gets past the locked door the flightcrew now have a last line of defence.
I want one, where do I sign up?
RE: Boeing 727 Flies Into History !
Ahhh I see. But I don’t think the engine upgrade could have been the Olympus as that is the engine used in the Concorde!!!