dark light

wysiwyg

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 781 through 795 (of 3,331 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Manchester again – and an unusual event……………. #621776
    wysiwyg
    Participant

    Virgin 747 classics are due to be gone by spring.

    in reply to: Manchester again – and an unusual event……………. #702494
    wysiwyg
    Participant

    Virgin 747 classics are due to be gone by spring.

    in reply to: Missed Approaches. #622005
    wysiwyg
    Participant

    Full load of passengers. No problems telling the pax as we just told them the truth. We had a guy on the jumpseat observing prior to him training to be a training Captain so we got him to do the PA as we were somewhat busy.

    in reply to: Missed Approaches. #703217
    wysiwyg
    Participant

    Full load of passengers. No problems telling the pax as we just told them the truth. We had a guy on the jumpseat observing prior to him training to be a training Captain so we got him to do the PA as we were somewhat busy.

    in reply to: A380 or 7E7? #622011
    wysiwyg
    Participant

    …because you turn the conversation agressive. Everyone else is capable of debating in a non-confrontational manner. Apologies if that is a bit blunt but if you don’t see it take a look at the forum over the last couple of weeks compared to the last couple of days.

    in reply to: A380 or 7E7? #703225
    wysiwyg
    Participant

    …because you turn the conversation agressive. Everyone else is capable of debating in a non-confrontational manner. Apologies if that is a bit blunt but if you don’t see it take a look at the forum over the last couple of weeks compared to the last couple of days.

    in reply to: Missed Approaches. #622014
    wysiwyg
    Participant

    We plan our fuel so that we can taxi, take off, fly to destination (plus 5% contingency in case of unknown factors), go around, divert to our alternate, hold there for 30 minutes and land. If there is a likelihood of delays (weather, runway closures, etc) we will plan extra fuel. I did 2 go arounds at Newark a couple of weeks ago due firstly to a Fedex 727 that was cleared line up and immediate departure before then sitting stationary on the runway and then on the next approach attrocious air traffic controlling vectored me to 4 mile final at 2500 feet before asking if I could get in visually from that position. The answer was NO!!! Fortunately I had departed with an extra 3 1/2 tonnes of fuel as I suspected things might be amiss as one of the 2 main parallel runways was unavailable for a period of a couple of weeks.

    in reply to: Missed Approaches. #703226
    wysiwyg
    Participant

    We plan our fuel so that we can taxi, take off, fly to destination (plus 5% contingency in case of unknown factors), go around, divert to our alternate, hold there for 30 minutes and land. If there is a likelihood of delays (weather, runway closures, etc) we will plan extra fuel. I did 2 go arounds at Newark a couple of weeks ago due firstly to a Fedex 727 that was cleared line up and immediate departure before then sitting stationary on the runway and then on the next approach attrocious air traffic controlling vectored me to 4 mile final at 2500 feet before asking if I could get in visually from that position. The answer was NO!!! Fortunately I had departed with an extra 3 1/2 tonnes of fuel as I suspected things might be amiss as one of the 2 main parallel runways was unavailable for a period of a couple of weeks.

    in reply to: A380 or 7E7? #622037
    wysiwyg
    Participant

    quite right too…even if that opinion is 10 foot wide and rammed down our throat twice daily! 😉

    in reply to: A380 or 7E7? #703431
    wysiwyg
    Participant

    quite right too…even if that opinion is 10 foot wide and rammed down our throat twice daily! 😉

    in reply to: MYT Boeing update #622038
    wysiwyg
    Participant

    W patterns are already planned using the BHX based aircraft but they are looking at the possibility of basing one airframe there.

    in reply to: MYT Boeing update #703436
    wysiwyg
    Participant

    W patterns are already planned using the BHX based aircraft but they are looking at the possibility of basing one airframe there.

    in reply to: BA cabin crew 'fail breath test' #622041
    wysiwyg
    Participant

    Don’t jump to too many conclusions just yet…the last skipper BA fired for being drunk on duty proved that he had not consumed alcohol for a long time before duty and had NONE in his bloodstream! I’m not saying they are innocent, just that we need time for the case to be investigated.

    in reply to: BA cabin crew 'fail breath test' #703440
    wysiwyg
    Participant

    Don’t jump to too many conclusions just yet…the last skipper BA fired for being drunk on duty proved that he had not consumed alcohol for a long time before duty and had NONE in his bloodstream! I’m not saying they are innocent, just that we need time for the case to be investigated.

    in reply to: MYT Boeing update #622258
    wysiwyg
    Participant

    For some strange reason I still get e-mails from TCX. They are talking about ops from Finningly (possibly with a based aircraft there). Excuse my geographical ignorance oop north but would that be convenient employment?

Viewing 15 posts - 781 through 795 (of 3,331 total)