The APU intake is open.
Does anyone know is its BA SOP to start the APU on any stage of approach?
Or is this further indication of a power issue?
Don’t know exact BA 777 SOP but 757 would start APU at FL100 in descent if LVO conditions in force (which was not the case at the time). The APU on the 777 would auto-start in the event of failure of both main AC bus’s which opened the flap. The RAT would also deploy automatically. Whether or not the APU had time to fire up or not we don’t know yet.
What about fuel starvation??
From the moment the aircraft gets airborne the arrival fuel is being monitored and pre-calculated (to confirm the pre-flight planning figures). This is then rechecked (minimum hourly) throughout the entire remainder of the flight. It could then be compromised by excessive holding but would still be watched by the crew who would then have procedures to follow to instigate diversion or PAN calls at a much earlier stage. Unlikely (unless either the crew ignored procedures or the bottom of the tanks contained massive amounts of water).
and 7) if this really was an uncommanded dual engine shut down/failure wouldn’t the type have been grounded immediately.
My thoughts are with the crew as whatever the outcome, their problems are only just about to start.
Just a few thoughts for your perusal:
1) The aircraft had its wheels pushed straight up through the top surface with no contact with fuel tanks so no rupturing. It then lost almost all its speed sliding on grass so there were no sparks until almost zero forward speed to ignite non-ruptured tanks.
2) Loss of avionics? The amount of system redundancy naturally available is massive but the cabin looks like it never suffered a power loss. If systems were struggling the cabin would be load shed well before the flightdeck.
3) Massive flock of birds? Wrong time of day and year. It would have to have been a massive number of birds so where is the damage to the rest of the airframe?
4) I was in the area all day and got hit by some very nasty showers caused by the massive atmospheric instability that occurred yesterday.
5) Fantastic structural integrity of that fuselage design.
6) Standard of BBC reporting seems to be significantly better than ITN. Newsnight seemed to have a very sensible approach to the issue last night.
I love the way some airlines/manufacturers make a big song and dance about something that has been in operation on other types/carriers for 6 years!
IIRC 4 engines in such close proximity required take off performance to consider 2 engines inop due to the increased chance of an errant fan blade or two taking out the adjacant engine whereas conventional quads only require one engine inop for take off. Consequently they need to be grossly overpowered which then tends to make them inefficient.
I remember Air South as my brother and I did our PPLs there in the mid 80’s. That Cub was hanging on the hangar wall at the time awaiting restoration. There was a Tiger in the hangar along with John Poth’s Redwing but I can’t remember its reg unfortunately. I saw John and Jenny at Old Sarum in the mid/late 90’s so I wonder if the Tiger ended up over there?
The FAA license is effectively worthless in Europe. It sits approximately half way between a JAA PPL and CPL.
Jet engines produce more thrust when flying through rain. Remember from school Force = Mass x Acceleration. Acceleration is the same as in dry conditions but the mass of the accelerated gasses has increased, therefore more force is created. This is one of the reasons why some engines such as the RR Dart and the P&W JT8 have water tanks (sometimes with added methanol) to actually squirt water into the intakes.
I used to own and fly a vintage microlight, an Eipper Quicksilver MX2. I sold it because it was so confusing to fly as the roll control was achieved through spoilerons connected to foot pedals and the rudder was connected to the lateral movement of the control column! There was an extra pedal which gave nosewheel steering… press with right toe to go right but press right heel to go left!!! The strip I kept it at was always crosswind so these crosswind take-offs and landings were a nightmare.
These days I get my kicks from paramotoring. Ultimate open cockpit!
Atomisation occurs fairly quickly. We usually consider a minimum of 5000′ terrain clearance to be adequate but ATC in most places will give you higher. We assume a descent rate of around 500′ per minute for the jettisoned load and will usually ask for 2 minute legs in the hold to avoid flying into our own efflux.
Not very likely these days… unless you’ve got a rich Daddy!
Moving to the short/medium haul charter twin jets doubled my turboprop salary and then moving to long haul schedule quads very nearly doubled my charter salary. All of this without considering changing which side of the cockpit I was sitting on. My brother (national carrier long haul ETOPS skipper) approximately doubles my salary. What annoys me though is that his ex-wife gets more in alimony than I earn!
They stopped making the Saab 340 around about 1999/2000.
It’s not just a case of whacking on a pair of old floorboards at a jaunty angle! The research and design costs millions before you even start looking at manufacture, test flying and approvals. The cost to make the upgrade is monumental and likely to add benefit solely to aircraft spending a significant proportion of the airborne time in the cruise phase. Then you have to consider who owns the aeroplane. If it belongs to a leasing company and you only have a short while left to go on the lease it won’t be worth it. You will also have to return the aircraft in the condition you took it in, ie no winglets. If you own the aircraft, will you be keeping it in service long enough to warrant it. What are the implications of one being damaged and what is the likelihood. If you do a lot of turnarounds and the aircraft is not allowed under the CDL part of the MEL to dispatch with one missing it may not be worth the risk.
There are just a handful of reasons why some people chose not to bother. If it comes as standard fit then that is a whole different ballgame.