dark light

wysiwyg

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1,156 through 1,170 (of 3,331 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Stansted Hotting Up This Summer #675542
    wysiwyg
    Participant

    When they change over to the standby runway there is always a period of 15 minutes when operations are not permitted. this is to allow things such as the lights to be changed over. The same occurs when returning to the main runway.

    in reply to: PLEASE HELP (flight info) #675544
    wysiwyg
    Participant

    A couple of MyTravel pilots I know have told me they are keeping the 767’s and want rid of the A330’s…at least that was the plan a fortnight ago!

    in reply to: Stansted Hotting Up This Summer #675557
    wysiwyg
    Participant

    There’s no ground based approach aid for an approach to 08L or 26R at LGW but ATC will give you an SRA (Surveillance Radar Approach). This means they will give you talkdown to a higher minima than an ILS (typically about 500′. It really is a bit of a left a bit, up a bit, right a bit, down a bit sort of thing!

    in reply to: Stansted Hotting Up This Summer #678040
    wysiwyg
    Participant

    Every now and then we use the second runway at LGW during the night when maintenance takes place on the main runway.

    in reply to: A new beginning for the forum #679491
    wysiwyg
    Participant

    Had another chat with Webby this afternoon and I’m delighted to say that the bosses of Key Publishing have reached a very good decision on the future of these boards. The changes are not going to be just for this forum but for all of them. I understand Webby is going to be making an announcement today so I shall leave it up to him to let you know. I will comment (cheer 🙂 )after he has spoken.

    in reply to: A new beginning for the forum #679703
    wysiwyg
    Participant

    The thanks really go to Webmaster as he removed the main problems before I spoke to him. There is a strong possibility they will endeavour to return but they will be removed as they appear. The code of conduct is now with him so it is now up to him to decide if it needs any refinements before posting it as a sticky. This is still only the beginning of the sorting out process and it must be remembered that there are still one or two of you out there that have sailed very close to the wind but survived. The power is now returning to the masses so if you are reading this feeling a little wriggly in your seat you may want to consider your attitude online.

    Regards
    Ian

    in reply to: Dispatchers #679845
    wysiwyg
    Participant

    It’s a highly skilled and very responsible job. I believe that various colleges local to the more major airports run dispatcher courses which you can join off your own back. Once you have the qualification you should be welcomed into the industry.

    in reply to: R.A.F update #438031
    wysiwyg
    Participant

    To be honest Robert I’m not 100% sure about the legalities on this one. I would however mention that I know quite a lot of ex-Army and ex-Navy helicopters and they are all absolutely great blokes without the ‘chips on their shoulder’ approach that you can experience with a small number of RAF pilots. Much more down to earth and real life.

    in reply to: Pitot and static head blockages #438032
    wysiwyg
    Participant

    I didn’t know that but I guess it’s still manslaughter.

    in reply to: Pitot and static head blockages #438036
    wysiwyg
    Participant

    Steve, your second para refers to the climb out so I presume the first paragraph refers to the acceleration on the ground through the take off roll and rotation until the wheels leave the ground. In this case the ASI will function perfectly normally throughout the take off ground roll if the static port is taped over. It is only when the aircraft starts to gain altitude that the ASI would start to misread as the static pressure within the instrument case would no longer be able to compensate for the ambient pressure reduction with gain of altitude.

    Also, quote ‘therefore the air pressure coming in through the pitot won’t register the true air speed’ – The pressure sensed in the pitot is used to derive indicated airspeed on the ASI although I’m sure that’s what you meant to say.

    There are also other implications to this accident in that the pressures sensed by the pitot and static ports (and there are several of each) are fed to the Air Data Computers which not only supply the instrumentation but also systems such as the Thrust Management Computer. Duff pressures would therefore command the autothrottle to set the wrong take-off thrust amongst other problems.

    in reply to: Pitot and static head blockages #438038
    wysiwyg
    Participant

    Perhaps I can comment (even on the GA forum) as this accident occurred on the type I fly. It is Boeing standard operating procedure for the non-handling pilot to cross check the airspeed indicators and call 80 knots when this speed is passed. This acts as a ‘dead mans call’ and must receive a ‘check’ response to state that the handling pilot is alive and well. Rather than just responding with the word ‘check’ the handling pilot would have glanced down and verified the ASI reading before making the call. With this information you can see that BOTH pilots failed to spot the error between the 2 ASI’s which most definitely should have resulted in a low speed abort.

    wysiwyg
    Participant

    Around about that time of night an Aurigny Shorts 360 returns from East Mids to Gatwick (Mon-Fri). If LGW is on 26L they would get a direct that would take them over the top of you. There may well also be some Emerald and Channex ops around that time as well.

    in reply to: Cabin, Cockpit and Flight Rules #684371
    wysiwyg
    Participant

    Exactly, the keypad is used to make a REQUEST for the person inside to open the door.

    in reply to: Singapore sells 8 744's #684545
    wysiwyg
    Participant

    757 doesn’t have Trents.

    in reply to: Havoc at 35 Thousand feet. A debate for all. #684555
    wysiwyg
    Participant

    Let me see, my last alcohol related passenger incident was just 10 days ago! Unfortunately as that passenger is still yet to try to return (and discover that they are now subject to a travelling ban) I’d better not go into it too much…yet!

Viewing 15 posts - 1,156 through 1,170 (of 3,331 total)