I thought the crew were dual based at both GLA and EDI.
Good job they hadn’t tried using 767’s then!
Well I have to say that if you compared that report to what EAL was writing last summer it is absolutely excellent. Well done EAL-King and thanks for the effort you have made. I’m particularly keen to hear your report on Guernsey.
That one happened last summer. It got brought back up again by the press last week.
Originally posted by Bmused55
Cos my 146 looked sh!te 😉
It’s not you Sandy, they all look like that! 😉
Yes but they were originally delivered to many different airlines.
Originally posted by Flood
Not an answer but an observation – the airlines bring it upon themselves by serving alcohol on board… No drink: no aggressive behavour. Yes?
I can’t disagree with what you say, Flood…but the problem is that if my charter airline stopped serving alcohol tomorrow and the rest continued, we’d go bust in weeks. In essence it’s the right thing to do but also commercial suicide. On that basis, if you were the MD would you do it?
Originally posted by purser
After production finished in the UK were’nt they being built in Romania under some sort of agreement?
Yes they were. They were built by ROMAVIA(?) and I believe DanAir operated some of these aircraft. An offshoot of ROMAVIA called BRASOV built a glider called an IS28 which BAC (gawd bless ’em :rolleyes: ) built in exchange! The Romanian built 1-11’s were referred to as the ROMBAC 1-11.
The General Discussion forum is an ‘anything goes’ forum. This is an airline specific forum and therefore should not be used like the chat room the GD forum is used as.
Originally posted by Jeanske_SN
Pilots can land the aircraft manually on instruments only, so when visibility is very ittle?
Sorry Jeanske, don’t understand the question.
I used to go to Boston fairly frequently a few Years ago. The bar was/is called Cheers however the inside doesn’t look anything like how it did in the program. Had one beer and went elsewhere!
Originally posted by skylinerworld
…The reason I was asking as a pretty recent trip to MAN I made it was an extremely windy day and it caused a Britannia B757 and 2 British airways Embraer 145s to go around again,the Britannia seemed so close to the runway,we even lost sight of it when it was going down,the next time we looked, it was going up turning right over us![pretty loud!!!!}
Although the 757 is capable of Cat 3b approaches with no decision height in vis down to 75 meters we sometimes make cat 3b approaches witha decision height anywhere between 14 and 49 feet due to airfield limitations. In a go around from these sort of decision heights the aircraft is most likely to bounce off the runway during the manoeuvre.
My company SOP’s mandate the use of autoland when the visibility is below Cat 1 minima however there are other types of adverse weather conditions where you would be obliged to do a manual landing. A classic example would be windy conditions. Most commercial aircraft with autoland capability have crosswind/headwind/tailwind limits that are more restrictive than normal operations so in strong wind conditions a manual landing must be made.
I’m sure you know some went to Loganair. If we’re lucky the rest have been smelted down in order to make real aeroplanes!
Your car insurance will never get cheaper. All that happens is you realise you can justify the insurance cost of upgrading to a higher risk car!
Happy birthday