Dunno for sure. Probably about 3 weeks for groundschool and about 3 weeks for sim.
The first flights I did on the 757 were on C engined aeroplanes and I thought it went like stink. All the Thomas Cook aircraft are E engined and make the C engined aircraft seem like a Robin Reliant!
Originally posted by Bmused55
If I’m not mistaken, there is an air outlet in the roof of the cockpit on the 757 where pilots have been known to stand and blow the smoke of their fag into. Might be a 747 though and I’m getting my wires crossed??
That’s the 747 classic. They have a smoke evacuation hatch in the flightdeck ceiling. It is situated in the spot where the original 747’s had a sextant viewing window!!!
JFK has always been mafia central. All the various ground based companies are under a certain amount of control. Other companies have tried to set up but have been ‘dissuaded’!
There are a few minor functions that we can achieve inflight using that panel but it is very rare that we would touch it. You can bring up more info on the lower EICAS abour electrics, hydraulics, etc. The engineers will use it during turn around to obtain the data from an event record from the previous flight so that they can monitor the aircrafts ongoing performance.
At Flap 30 on a 757, if you overspeed then load alleviation will occur retracting the flaps to 25 until the speed reduces back to below 162 knots (168 knots on the 300). Do any airbus types do this or does it just rely on autothrottle not allowing a higher speed for the relevant flap setting?
Oh I see…it’s just another 3 letter acronym for a device that does the same job as that on a Boeing to stop flap/slat asymetries.
Thanks for the info Darren. I didn’t realise the automatic idle stop wasn’t an original installation. In that case the Swiss must have insisted that the manually applied stop remained in place despite the automatic stop being in place as their Saabs always had both whereas the Saabs Aurigny inherited from you and the ones we borrowed from Skyways and Regional Airlines all had the manual stop removed.
Can we have some more info about these please. I’ve never come across them before and guess they are about to become part of my day to day existence on the A340! 😎
As Moondance says.
To open the window you slide the map holder rearwards to create space to open the locking catch (the ‘pole’ in the picture). Presse the button on the top of the pole and rotate it 180 degrees rearwards. The window is now unlocked so that cranking the lever (circled in the picture) causes the window to come inwards before sliding rear in its tracks and then crushing the item you forgot to move that was stored behind your elbow!!! Reverse the process to close.
Interesting that 2 similar crashes have occurred in relatively close proximity.
Forget about comparing turboprop reverse pitch incidents with turbofan/jet reverse thrust incidents as the machinery is totally different.
With regard to turboprops I can only refer to the Saab 340 as I never flew any other turboprop. The Saab has a thing called a ‘beta stop’ which was a device that prevented the propellers entering the Beta range and subsequently entering thereverse pitch angles. This beta stop should automatically disengage when the aircraft touched down to allow reverse pitch to be selected. There was a ‘beta stop override’ that could be pulled to allow selection of reverse in case the beta stop did not automatically disengage. I remember when I trained with Crossair that all their aircraft were fitted with an additional mechanical catch that their pilots would engage after take off to manually prevent the power levers being moved beneath the flight idle stops in flight. This catch would then be disengaged during the landing checklist. This mod was only ever enforced by the Swiss. I believe there had been a Saab 340 crash (far east?) where the crew over rode the beta stop in flight and lost all their propeller blades!
The 757 lands firmly off a flapless approach due to reduced amount of tail clearance from the high approach attitude to flare adequately to arrest the descent rate. Done correctly the landing will still be within limits but it requires much more finesse than a normal flap 25 or 30 landing. Bearing in mind that you get to practice one in the sim every three years you can perhaps see where the problem lies.
Looks like a Saab 340 with a tarts handbag restyling job to me!
From our perspective the main worries for landing without trailing edge devices are:
1) high approach and touchdown speeds means a lot of energy has to be killed through the brakes.
2) this also means a lot of runway length required. Combine this with icy wintry weather and you’ve got a big problem.
3) a very high body angle on the approach due to lack of flaps will mean almost no flare available or you will strike the tail. The landing/arrival is going to be FIRM.
4) because the approach has to be flown with relatively little drag the thrust settings will be low. In the event of a go-around there is a large risk of seriously asymetric spool up.
Chills me to the bone…I used to tow gliders in that plane for that club.
RIP