‘Might injure someone’? I like your optimism but unless the defence is forewarned and ready then the attackers initially hold all the cards; the shock of being under attack and panic from those trapped and under fire won’t help. There will be deaths. —- 😀 Anytime anyone picks up a firearm at a gunshow their are many, many eyes on that person, whether the seller, the Law, or simply others attending.
Guns must now be made temp. inoperable or they do not get in. For some one to start the task of making a firearm capable to chamber a round means his/her chance of success is some where between none and next to none.
BUT, I MUST add, at some gun shows knives are also sold and to stop one from grabbing one and start slashing, the odds are that people would be hurt and possibly killed.

Nope, never heard of her – but she certainly seems to be more along your line of thinking than mine… —- No she is a fairly well known liberal journalist who vocally hates and insults conservatives and firearms, very your style.

You mean they are not even a little bit like the KKK, with hoods, secret handshakes and burning crosses? How disappointing.

No, no much closer to the British Parliament.;)

Headquarters is 22 miles from DC.

Laughing, it gets better all the time doesn’t it! No-one can get into a gun-nut meeting with a loaded gun because anyone trying do do so would be shot dead before they made it inside. —-Does that disappoint you?

If they load up inside they’d be brutally bludgeoned, presumably by unloaded weapons? I love Americans logic.

You never been to a NRA show, they do not have secret gun meetings, and you blatantly know nothing of the security there, or any gun show in the U.S.

NRA officials meet at NRA headquarters or have business meeting like any other business in proper surroundings. (There is a fifty yard indoor shooting range just behind the office headquarters — EEWWWW, that is scary kids)
Your rather childish dream scenario sounds as if you are a bit annoyed your fantasy of the NRA and U.S. gun owners is only your fantasy.

All weapons are checked by law enforcement, and made temporarily inoperable, at any U.S. gun show so go on with your obtuse scenario but that does not make it any less obtuse if that makes you feel better.

You may answer my question above if you wish and I have enjoyed the bizarre responses but enough is enough.
Que sera, sera.
Merry Christmas:highly_amused:

:angel:

You do make me laugh sometimes.

Moggy

Just spreading a little good Christian Christmas cheer.

Gee. More gun laws. So maybe if they had been in place it would be potentially difficult for would-be terrorists to purchase guns. But you don’t believe in that, do you. More guns, yes? —– As so far reported the guns were purchased through a straw-man, which is already a Federal offense.

Much as I see the humour of gunmen at a gun men’s meeting I doubt that they would be allowed to carry their weapons into such conferences so that any terrorists would be disarmed as well.

Ah I see you are not totally ill informed.

It would be carnage as their dream came true and every backwoodsman in the room dragged out his piece and started blasting in a bid to be a hero. I’d guess there would be at least five self-inflicted leg or bollock wounds, a couple of dozen NRA members shot by their chums and a single terrorist dying from choking on laughter as he watched the fun.

Moggy

:applause:Dream on boys.
You have made it exceptionally clear you have no idea of how the NRA operates, or how any gun shows operate.
No one, without exception, would get into a NRA show, or any gun show with a loaded firearm.

Of course they could try to do a forced invasion, in which, some law enforcement officials would possibly be killed but the armed invaders would be shot dead long before they reached the door.
Now if they were truly diabolical and came with cartridges in their pockets, came in mass numbers, and were able to chamber a round or two before being clubbed to death or apprehended they might injure some one but that is all.

Did some of you know this journalist, your rhetoric is so similar?
http://townhall.com/tipsheet/christinerousselle/2015/12/06/new-york-daily-news-column-likens-san-bernardino-attack-victim-to-terrorists-n2089541

You can have your dream, but that is all you have.:cool::highly_amused:

dream on.
http://www.businessinsider.com/nra-gun-research-cdc-statistics-2013-1?IR=T —- Holy MOLY, the NRA has by magic the power to deny access to files from the FBI, BATF, plus state and local governments, AMAZING. ROFLAMAO

http://www.economist.com/blogs/democracyinamerica/2014/06/gun-control-america —- WOW, an opinion article from The Economist.
What is next, The Daily Mail?

http://mediamatters.org/blog/2013/02/26/nras-media-misinformation-series-pushes-systemi/192799 —-OH GEE, the unbiased Media Matters:

Media Matters, the watchdog group that loves to hate Fox News
By Paul Farhi
Washington Post Staff Writer
Thursday, December 2, 2010; 8:09 PM

It takes only an instant for a visitor to Media Matters for America’s headquarters in downtown Washington to sense its mission, if not its methods. A few steps into its modern offices, which resemble a newspaper newsroom, a pair of prominently displayed signs spell out the basics: “Fox Keeps Fear Alive,” reads one; “Restore Sanity, Fight Fox,” reads its companion.
Fighting Fox is what Media Matters does, relentlessly and obsessively. In the six years since its founding, the watchdog group has evolved from an all-purpose scourge of the conservative media into Fox News Channel’s veritable shadow and constant irritant. From well before sunrise to long after it each day, teams of young researchers sift through video clips and transcripts of programs hosted by Fox stars such as Glenn Beck and Bill O’Reilly to find dubious facts, logical contradictions and poisonous – at least to Media Matters’ liberal sensibilities – rhetoric.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/12/02/AR2010120205779.html

“

Maybe its me. but I don’t recall ever, EVER hearing RpR expressing anything about the victims of these frequent ‘occurrences’.

.

Unlike politicians I shed no bs crocodile tears as I am as concerned about their lives, as they are about mine.
It is a shame this happens and worse politicians try to use sorrow of others for political purposes, but such is the way of men.

I do not engage in the sad talk lie the liberals in this country pretend to have for the victims.

If you think flowers, candles, sad and self-righteous talk actually amounts to anything engage in that task but symbolism over substance is just political bs at its worst.

I would almost think some of you work for Pres. Obama as his speech from his Oval Office tonight about how to deal with Islamic terrorism was for him say we need more gun laws, brilliant.
Yesterday, rather than go out to San Bernardino and speak with the families, he went to visit Gabrielle Gifford, the former congress woman who wants more gun laws.
That is going to put fear in the hearts of terrorists.

Because I was bored and I was curious to see what idiocy you would come up with in response.

But it’s true. I don’t care. A thousand dead americans, a thousand dead Syrians, a thousand dead rwandans…all the same to me. You gun-wielders are all ****** up in the head and think you’re God. Well, here’s the news: God isn’t real and you’re just mental.

If this is what you do when you are bored you lead a very sad life.
Merry Christmas.