Its very nice but i prefer the current US scheme

The 2nd daily CSA service night stops at GLA.

Do the daily flights not need to be year round ? Some of those GLA GSM routes are not.

GSM, GLA to TFS, ALC, AGP are all daily year round.

Well they refused to fund GSM from GLA to ALC, AGP, PMI, FAO etc which are all daily so why do they not fund them routs but they did fund GSM daily to PRG and BCN? They SE is a bit of an embarisment to Scotland not just in aviation if you ask me and i’m sure if you ask the majority of Scot’s they will agree, but thats not reallt 100% aviation related so i will not go in to that much further.

GSM will NOT get funding as it is NOT a new routs. Funding only goes to flights to places not currently operation to/from Scotland but as there is already a EDI-PRG service it will not get funding. I dont know what happend with both GSM and CSA on GLA-PRG but they both anounced with in one or two days of each other and both started these flights on the 31st of October.

No reason why they shouldnt

no reason why they should.

I have both ultomate traffic and Traffic 2004. I would say Traffic 2004 is better as it offers far more airlines and it easier to change the schedules so that say in real life a new airline added flights to your loacal you can easily do it on the game.

Must be having fantastic loads on GLA-PRG so they are going to try EDI-PRG.