Please don’t think for a second I’m in anything but total agreement, but surely as a moderator you should be addressing the issue by sending a PM to A330-200 outlining the problems with his posting instead of making comments such as these? Just an observation.
Paul
And also rather presumptuous, Paul, whilst you have the best interests at heart do you think we just sit here for the sake of it? as Lance has said of course I have done these things, but we’re hardly going to release things like that into the public domain are we, 🙂 you can draw a horse to it’s water, but you can’t make him drink it
also wat what euro atlantic doing there
Pardon? nobody understands a word you are saying :rolleyes:
Very sad indeed 🙁 seems to be rather alot lately
Always the way, I had them because I’ve been to Oz a few times and obviously BA & Qantas operate them on this route, so I was lucky in that respect, I have a few sectors in the 742 & 747-SP as well, that was just as wonderful if a bit cold lol
Great shots Elgan, the 744 is wonderful isn’t she, had a fair few trips in her now, 9 sectors in all, can’t beat it
Great shots Si, miss flying from Bristol, must take a trip down there sometime
This thread is going nowhere, digressed far too much, A330-200 please CHECK YOUR PMs (again)
locked
A330-200. can you PLEASE combine your posts, you are making alot of posts for the hell of it when you can combine all of them, the edit facility is your best friend
But I suppose you have to consider his position. Would he have known what kind of go-around procedure to follow in that situation? Would he have known which way it was safe to turn? Because i’m pretty sure the normal procedure is to climb straight ahead. Maybe he thought it would be safer to continue, rather than risk flying into the path of the CRJ?
Of course he would have done, and of course he would have done, with respect I do think you are dressing this up to be something it is not, the pilot follows the missed approach procedure on the ILS where they fly to the missed approach point which is a designated point in the procedure, generally this involves passing the MAP then a climb straight ahead on the procedure, it could be runway heading to 2500ft etc, without the runway in use I can’t ascertain this, but a go around at a very low altitude would “generally” be to follow ATC until he can take up the procedure
The real issue here is that the Dash did not turn right as instructed, generally late landing clearances are normal, rarely they result in a go around, whilst it may have been a “dodgy” event to the untrained eye generally this sort of thing is a non event, and maybe someone ought to tell the press? tell me you are joking right? :rolleyes:
Hilarious
Hilarious
A330-200
Please do me a favour, can you have a read of this post Clicky and pay particular attention to number 10 in the list :rolleyes:
Lifespan or design limitation? 😉
While any death is tragic. Irwin was always a camera hog. Some call his act enthusiasm, I just saw it as egotism. A lot of time the animals he wanted to film would be just sleeping, and he would go and pick it up, forcing it to lash out at him. But hey, it made for great TV. Oh well, The Crocodile Hunter was a Hollywood character, and he died like a Hollywood character.
Just let this be a lesson to people. Wild animals like people just want to be left alone.
What nonsensical rubbish, google is your best friend, try researching Steve before you come out with such trash, I never saw him make animals lash out at him, your obviously viewing something different to the majority of us, he was far from a hollywood character, you were right the first time, he was full of enthusiasm, enthusiasm for the love of his work, and he acheived so much doing it, more than probably you could ever realise in your lifetime, so do us a favour, have a wee play on google for 30 minutes, you may even surprise yourself
Oh & well said Phantom