Hi Paul
It went superb, infact it was an absolute peach lol, better than my others btu I guess that was blind luck, Ive landed at dusk before but never as dark as that, luckily everything was easy to see as the airport and Bristol City was lit up, it wasnt completely dark but near as damn it and as I said above I havent got a night rating so I was becoming concerned with the light fading so fast and obviously it being darker at ground level than up in the air but waiting for the emergency flight to land and be cleared away was safer than diverting, if he’d pancaked on the runway and I HAD to divert then things could have gotten interesting, luckily it was a beautiful day and Cardiff isnt that far away (Filton may have been closed)
Dean
infact Steve
If you repost it in another topic I’ll make it a sticky thread, I know the info is only relevant until the CAA update or change the rulings etc but we can cross that bridge as and when this happens
D.
DME
Get us some piccies mate 😉 I love night shots 🙂
Bradburger
No pop intended or taken
I interpret the original question as being how the aircraft behaves so Im merely talking about the way the default aircraft handles in flight Characteristics, the FS engine may indeed be great but I am not happy about the way the default aircraft behave, I will give the FMWB a go and see how it differs 🙂
Dean
Steve
great post, very informative, Im sure alot of people will gain something from this thanks
Dean
Bradburger
I did read your original post and I totally disagree, the FS flight model is not accurate
Take a trial flying lesson, get the instructor to demonstrate a stall, then get in the default Cessna in FS and try the same thing then get back to me
D.
Nice pics Comet
Approach is a tad high innit into Stansted? 😉 hope you maintained a good approach profile and not dived her into the threshold like you would a Cessna :p 😉
Guys
Being a real world pilot (albiet a private one until I get my fATPL) I can assure you the FS2004 flight model is absolute pants (thats a technical term) and the same goes for IL2-Sturmovik (although slightly better than FS2004) the best FS sim for best physics is what Paul Rix said without question and thats X-Plane, and again like Paul said FS2004 is really useful for instrument training & the gfx are nice but thats about it
Dean
More
And the reason we came, Flight EK001 from Dubai at the bottom carrying my in-laws near to touchdown rwy 27R
More
And the reason we came, Flight EK001 from Dubai at the bottom carrying my in-laws near to touchdown rwy 27R
lol Moggy indeed not, especially if he hasnt got the required equipment to work out the WCA etc :D,
thats great fun to do on FS Moggy, Ive tried doing it with a planned route of mine and with real wind set and it worked a treat
Alternatively T5 you can use the GPS to create the flightplan, Im off to London now so will explain when I get back tomorrow
Rgds
Dean
Im going with Paulc on this one 🙂
Im going with Paulc on this one 🙂
terrific shots Andrew, great to have a different perspective, I love looking at the planes in the overhead where I live with binoculars, I can see most of the LHR traffic going to the americas from my house, would love to have the equipment to photograph them as you have but Im not sure the wife would be very forgiving if I spent a small fortune on a lense capable 🙂
Dean.