dark light

Deano

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1,141 through 1,155 (of 2,910 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Auto pilot #515958
    Deano
    Participant

    There’s no SOP for engaging the autopilot, but this is usually done in the initial climb (500ft – 5000ft).

    There is an SOP, and every airline will have one regarding the use of the autopilot after take off.
    Ours is to engage the autopilot when we reach acceleration altitude (1,000ft aal), basically no autopilot on take off below 1000ft aal. However, tied in with this is the clause that allows us to hand fly the aircraft, if the weather is good we can hand fly it, as long as we’re not departing from a major Intl Airport like CDG we can hand fly it too. The only bad thing about hand flying it is that we are still following the flight director, and it get’s rather boring. Monkee see – Monkee do.

    The autopilot is usually disconnected when landing clearance is received – as it’s safer to let the A/P do a G/A then the pilot themselves. (If you listen to a scanner at LHR, you can here all the airbus A/P’s been disconnected when the aircraft is cleared to land.

    Again company SOPs will dictate this, and some will be more stringent than others, again we can hand fly the approach if we like, but only under certain conditions, i.e. no parallel approaches etc. We can conduct visual approaches too which are totally hand flown.
    What we do have to do is disconnect the autopilot at 200ft ARTE on a CAT I, and 80ft ARTE on a CAT II.

    You would only let the autopilot do the G/A if the G/A is in the FMS, this is not always the case, the initial part of the G/A is hand flown to at least Acceleration Altitude. Then autopilot engaged, all you are doing here is letting the AP fly the flight director, which will either take it’s information from the FMS or pilot input.

    Dean

    in reply to: Aeroflot Pilots arrested this morning at MAN. #517141
    Deano
    Participant

    Not on the pitiful wages BE pay me, I can barely afford to live πŸ˜€

    in reply to: Aeroflot Pilots arrested this morning at MAN. #517291
    Deano
    Participant

    Love it, then my car broke down to boot, just spent the last 3hrs in a recovery vehicle on the M5 :rolleyes:

    in reply to: Aeroflot Pilots arrested this morning at MAN. #517485
    Deano
    Participant

    Nick

    Company specific I think, (unless someone can reference it in JAR Ops), ours is 10hrs before duty, and the drink/drive limit is 80mg, making the drink/fly limit a ΒΌ of the drink/drive limit of 20mg as quoted by you.

    I’ll answer your PM tomorrow, have to be up at 3:30am for work πŸ™

    Deano
    Participant

    Happened to me in EXT at night last winter, fog was forming in the valleys and as we got to 50ft we went through a thin layer of fog, luckily regaining visual contact before touchdown.
    Was rather disconcerting I tell you, we were about to go around when we became visual again.

    in reply to: Edinburgh #494631
    Deano
    Participant

    What no Flybe? πŸ˜‰

    Nice pics and welcome

    in reply to: Where have all the Jetstreams gone? #518806
    Deano
    Participant

    See them all the time in GCI & JER, Blue Island have a few. Do Eastern still fly the 31?

    in reply to: What Happened To G-AVYB HS 121 Trident 1E? #519532
    Deano
    Participant

    If we let everyone “get one with their threads” then who knows what we’d have posted here.
    BAC 1-11 LOVER, you are not being picked on, if you adhere to the CoC posted on the top of each page then all is fine, afterall you personally agreed to adhere to the CoC when signing up to these forums.
    That’s the end of the matter, please put your typing efforts into something that contributes now please

    in reply to: PILOT FLYING HOURS #520226
    Deano
    Participant

    Not sure Andy to be honest, they are still in JAR land and CAP371 is a binding document of the ANO (formed by ICAO), I’d imagine they must have something extremely similar.

    Happy to be proved wrong of course if anyone knows exactly, but I have a friend who was with Ryanair and he talked about “Maxing out of hours at 900” etc.

    Tinkers, hmm, that’s a new definition on me πŸ˜‰

    in reply to: weather conditions for flying #520265
    Deano
    Participant

    wilag

    You will need a subscription based service for what you want, because turbulence etc can change by the hour, most pilot briefing services gives current and very short term future weather information, something like avbrief is the most common one.

    When are you going? if I am around I can create a briefing for you and PM you with it on the morning etc of your departure. I am most likely working though but worth a shot.

    Rgds

    Dean

    in reply to: PILOT FLYING HOURS #520378
    Deano
    Participant

    rob39

    There is no difference between Ryanair, Thomsonfly, Flybe, British Airways etc, all of us are limited by CAP371 which is a legal and binding document of the ANO (Air Navigation Order).

    FTL (Flight Time Limitations) are basically no more than:-

    100hrs in 28 days
    900hrs in 1 year

    Both of these limits are “rolling”.

    Duty Periods shall not exceed

    55hrs in 7 days
    95hrs in 14 days
    190hrs in 28 days.

    Again these are rolling limits. I am sure there’s an annual limit of something like 1950hrs but I can’t locate it.

    Unless of course they and their company have alternative ‘industrial’ agreements, however these would always be for lesser rather than greater amounts of flying.

    1L.

    This can be the case but as you say it cannot be more than those FTL & Duty times as laid down by CAP371, this document is limiting in all circumstances.

    Of course there is discretion, pilots & cabin crew can go into discretion which will be no more than 2hrs after the official deadline of your duty period for that day, you cannot knowingly go into discretion, and it is the commanders decision as to whether he thinks his crew can operate safely & efficiently.
    If we do go into discretion then there’s alot of paperwork involved and we have to inform the CAA with a valid reason.
    Duty periods are laid down in CAP371 for daily limits, taking into account your report time & how many sectors you fly, the earlier you check in and the more sectors you fly the more the Duty Period is limiting.

    Clear as mud? though so πŸ˜‰

    in reply to: 773ER take-off query. #520669
    Deano
    Participant

    Link doesn’t work, just post a direct link

    EDIT: appears YT was just running slow. It loads now πŸ˜‰

    in reply to: Breaking News: Incident at MAN #520837
    Deano
    Participant

    Shocking πŸ˜‰

    in reply to: General Discussion #326059
    Deano
    Participant

    As long as the plane is on the ground then normally it is ok, we get flight deck visit requests on a weekly basis and we’re always very happy to accommodate where necessary, the best one was a group of French hotties coming over for their hen night, suffice to say they wanted to have their photos taken sat on the f/o’s lap πŸ˜€

    in reply to: Flight Deck Visits #1903942
    Deano
    Participant

    As long as the plane is on the ground then normally it is ok, we get flight deck visit requests on a weekly basis and we’re always very happy to accommodate where necessary, the best one was a group of French hotties coming over for their hen night, suffice to say they wanted to have their photos taken sat on the f/o’s lap πŸ˜€

Viewing 15 posts - 1,141 through 1,155 (of 2,910 total)