He was a new kid getting everything from silver plate. He is a good driver, but inexperienced one and when it camed to the point where you really need to show your nerves, he failed. His head didn’t hold. When the situation in the drivers championship race was what it was, you need to be an iceman to handle the pressure..

But UK hasent Ratified the Maastricth pact, has it?

But in those countries, where pariamental decission cannot be reversed, the fact remain, that there isent legimate form for leaving the union

well nuclear can be made safe…as safe as any man made thing can be. The proplem is that despite all the safety technologies and stuff, the possibility that some one pushes the wrong putton at some point cannot be made 100% impossiple. And when nuclear plant goes overboard, single mistake can make half of the continent unlivable for the next 10,000 years. IMO the risk is too big…

Well I must to my own obscure admitt that finally we can agree over something with Sealord. The reason why most of the EU governments like ours refuses to give us the change to vote is plain and simple: they know it would be rejected in most of the countries. The reason why it would be rejected is again equally simple: People have lost their thurst over EU. The whole organisation is (if it ever was) so far away from the normal people in both concept and in its overall effect on everyones normal life.
This meassurement-depate is just one example of how EU is mostly seen among us “EU-citizens”, a source of pain-in-the-ass directives which are often against common sense and so ridicilous that you really start wonder if this all is just some large and weird candit-camera show. Thorw atop that a treaty which basicly disolves the last remains of independence’s scene, no wonder people are getting more and more disapointed with the whole thing…

…Funny enough, at least in paper, each country had a legistrative right to quit from Soviet Union, but there’s no such code in EU…

sore looser talks:dev2: :dev2: :dev2:

No you were not, your post appeared to be deliberately insulting to Americans and America, now you claim that was not your intention so either you are lying or you were not clear enough.

Nope. I wasen’t insulting americans, just fooling around with their expense. At least here where we understand humor there is a difference. I critizise, comment and underline unspoken stuff, and most often just trying to get other point of views getting spread. When someone is boasting with deathserious additute, I tend to do the exact opposite, tease with humour…makes me live longer..
But I don’t insult anyone, not even those who insults me. If you cannot take critism and humour otherway than as an insult, well again the proplem isen’t in me…

Yeah, I agree, the decissions needs to be taken now as well as first steps. The proplem is that all our way of life is so dependable over consuming energy.
Biggest proplem in there however is that we have let too much power to the Energy companies themselves, and by advocating free markets, we gradually give away all the tools needed to make the changes. I work myself in big energy company and what comes to enveriomental issues, they are only concerned when they can improve their public image by little stunts. All reall steps like investing to Wind and other alternatives are still beyond reality as they dont give profit, and unfortuanetly, that is what the “free world” is all about, profit…