dark light

Spectral

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 46 through 60 (of 261 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: General Discussion #307854
    Spectral
    Participant

    COME ON ENGLAND COME ON ENGLAND COME ON ENGLAND COME ON ENGLAND………

    Bahh, you’re all thinking you’re already in the semifinals or finals, we’ll see in a few hours time who’ll be laughing 😀

    I’d love to see the goalkeeper Ricardo score you the winning penalty kick again 😀

    in reply to: World Cup Thread (Merged) #1925912
    Spectral
    Participant

    COME ON ENGLAND COME ON ENGLAND COME ON ENGLAND COME ON ENGLAND………

    Bahh, you’re all thinking you’re already in the semifinals or finals, we’ll see in a few hours time who’ll be laughing 😀

    I’d love to see the goalkeeper Ricardo score you the winning penalty kick again 😀

    in reply to: RAAF Raptors? #2575116
    Spectral
    Participant

    Carlo Kopp Who`s that?? Sounds like a fake name from a movie?

    He’s an australian defence journalist/analyst who has an unhealthy obsession (to put it mildly :)) with the F-111, and barring that, the F-22. The way he writes it is almost like if it wasn’t for the F-111 during all these years Australia would’ve already been invaded by Indonesia and China, and the same is bound to happen in the future if they retire the F-111 and don’t replace it with the F-22.

    Apart from that, some of his more technical articles (like on missiles) articles seem pretty good.

    in reply to: Portuguese Puma Request #2576417
    Spectral
    Participant

    Mpacha,

    I’m not very into the FAP’s Pumas, especially their upgrade programmes, but I’ve forwarded this topic to people who definitely know it’s details, I hope soon someone more knowledgeable replies here 🙂

    in reply to: General Discussion #310109
    Spectral
    Participant

    Shadow1, they are not primma donnas, they just know how to take full advantage of the game, especially the deficiencies in the refereing system ( I think another referee is needed, and also tv recordings should be used to evaluate the more polemic plays).

    Shevshenko overrated ? Nahh, he’s probably the best striker out there at the moment, look at what he has done in all those years in AC Milan 🙂

    in reply to: World Cup Thread (Merged) #1926892
    Spectral
    Participant

    Shadow1, they are not primma donnas, they just know how to take full advantage of the game, especially the deficiencies in the refereing system ( I think another referee is needed, and also tv recordings should be used to evaluate the more polemic plays).

    Shevshenko overrated ? Nahh, he’s probably the best striker out there at the moment, look at what he has done in all those years in AC Milan 🙂

    in reply to: General Discussion #310302
    Spectral
    Participant

    Dude it’s the italians what were you expecting ?

    They defend the whole game and then score the winning goal with a dubious penalty in injury time. What better way to describe italian football ? 🙂

    in reply to: World Cup Thread (Merged) #1927007
    Spectral
    Participant

    Dude it’s the italians what were you expecting ?

    They defend the whole game and then score the winning goal with a dubious penalty in injury time. What better way to describe italian football ? 🙂

    in reply to: Australia adds 34 more MRH-90s. #2580716
    Spectral
    Participant

    The order is valued at roughly 1,5 billion dollar

    US or australian dollars ?

    I’ve seen a lot of confusion generated on other cases because of this 🙂

    in reply to: Your Favorite Warship? #2050843
    Spectral
    Participant

    Too bad they didn’t finish up Kentucky (Iowa class BB) as a missile ship like they were kicking around

    Wow, any pics on that ? That would be some bad-ass ship ! :diablo:

    in reply to: Your Favorite Warship? #2050924
    Spectral
    Participant

    I agree 100% on the bridge. It’s the loadout that impresses me. 104 Talos and 84 Tartar. And yes the other is a Virginia class CGN. IMO the one they should have built Aegis on but it seems the Spruance hull was the more economical choice. Aegis AND nuclear power was apparently too many $$$$.

    And the original Baltimore class had such fine lines…

    http://img60.imageshack.us/img60/9020/usschicago0cd.jpg

    And yeah that loadout is quite impressive. It took a ship as big as that to carry so many missiles 🙂

    Speaking of WWII ships, I’ve always been partial to HMS Warspite.

    Not only she has the classical lines of a battleship, but her history in both WWI and WWII is impressive.

    http://digilander.libero.it/shinano/Battaglienavali/Matapan/warspite.jpg

    I doubt many big ships saw so much action…

    in reply to: Your Favorite Warship? #2051016
    Spectral
    Participant

    Huh? Different pics og the same ship.

    Nope, the one on the left is USS Albany which has this hideously looking bridge 🙂 :

    http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/4/4d/Albany-iv-2.jpg

    The one on the right side is, I believe, a Virginia class CGN.

    in reply to: Mirage F1 pics #2586413
    Spectral
    Participant

    from http://www.vectorsite.net/avmirf1.html

    “One of the interesting footnotes of the Mirage F1 story was that in the 1970s one was built with the SNECMA M53 afterburning bypass turbojet, with 83.4 kN (8,500 kgp / 18,740 lbf) afterburning thrust. Fit of the M53 demanded structural changes, larger inlets, and heftier landing gear. The external appearance was generally the same, though the fuselage was stretched by 23 centimeters (9 inches) and empty weight increased by a little over 8%. It was originally designated “Mirage F1E” until that designation was passed off to the export multirole variant (discussed below) and then “Mirage F1.M53”. Initial flight of the one-off machine was on 22 December 1974.

    The Mirage F1.M53 may have originally been simply an engine testbed, but it seen as a possible contender for a requirement that had been issued by a number of Western European nations to obtain a replacement for the Lockheed F-104 Starfighter, then in widespread service but facing obsolescence. However, this “deal of the century” was snagged by the General Dynamics F-16, and work on a second Mirage F1.M53 prototype, which was to be fitted with full multirole combat avionics kit, was abandoned. The M53 was used in the Dassault Mirage 2000 second-generation delta fighter series.”

    in reply to: Tornado ADV: Foxhunter Radar #2587764
    Spectral
    Participant

    For Paul :

    When (if ever) will your website about russian avionics be up again ?

    Thanks ( and bice article btw 🙂 )

    in reply to: Uruguay to Buy Portuguese Frigates? #2051910
    Spectral
    Participant

    At the moment the FAP F-16 fleet consists of :

    -19 F-16 OCU flying ( out of 20 original,, 1 fell some years ago), which were bought new in 1993

    -25 F-16A bought second hand to upgrade to MLU pattern in 2000 I believe ( plus 5 for spares). Since then the program has evolved at a snail’s pace, so at the moment only 4 of these are flying, and 3 of them are undergoing modifications. The rest of them are still in crates.

    Reportedly 40 MLU kits were bought, as the original plans called for upgrading the whole 2 fleets.

    The main problem is, as always, money. FAP already had problems in manning just the original 20-aircraft strong fleet, due to lots of pilots contantly leaving for the civilian sector. When they started the whole 2nd fleet/MLU program it was hoped that knews how to sort things out in the future with the doubling of the # of acft, but the problems and delays surrounding the program since then suggest ( at least to me) that the process was poorly-thought of.

    Some reports in the press say it will be the OCUs to be sold after upgrading, other that it will be the A/Bs ( Peace Atlantis II), so things are very shady at the moment. Still, the plan is to upgrade all of them.

    As the first batch has suffered some structural strengthning, their expected lifetime is bigger.

Viewing 15 posts - 46 through 60 (of 261 total)