dark light

Beermat

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 2,626 through 2,640 (of 3,326 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Dzus help #901632
    Beermat
    Participant

    That would be perfect – thanks Tony 🙂

    in reply to: Dzus help #901696
    Beermat
    Participant

    ..although 7/16 across and 10/16 long might be feasible. Thanks, Sabrejet..

    in reply to: Dzus help #901704
    Beermat
    Participant

    Thanks Sabrejet. Yes, I was thinking the tenths thing is quite modern, it’s the way they do it, though, clearly and consistently described in the Dzus/Southco literature one can find on the net. I don’t know what was used in 1942, though I suspect you might be right about 16ths.

    The problem with making an FJ76 an FJ7-60 is what one does about an FJ70. FJ7-10 is smaller than any Dzus fastener is ever likely to be (1/10″), and would probably be called an FJ71 anyway, and FJ7-100 is an inch long (and is much bigger than anything in any catalogue).. and (edit) would not fit the area it’s for (radio hatch) anyway. We are looking in the range 0.4 to 0.5″ for our FJ70.

    in reply to: Replicas and reproductions #902845
    Beermat
    Participant

    EN in the context of WW2 stands for Emergency Number, being, particularly, steel alloys rapidly impressed into wartime service without the delay occasioned by a committee considering the materials classification under DTD (Directorate of Technical Development of the Air Ministry) or British Standard. Most of your Stirling would be composed of BS and DTD materials as well as EN. So you would be right using EN materials and most folk over the age of 65 think of steels in ‘EN’. Euro norm, that’s something different again….

    Found this among our collection – from a wartime ‘Aircraft Materials Ltd’ catalogue
    – shows that there were different names for the same thing.

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]233213[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]233214[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]233212[/ATTACH]

    I hadn’t encountered EN in this context before, I was wrong.

    in reply to: Seen on ebay 2014 #906034
    Beermat
    Participant

    This large private collection in London.. seriously folks, who is this fraudster? It does need to be stopped – it is beyond a joke now.

    in reply to: unknown propeller blade #907286
    Beermat
    Participant

    Hamilton Standard 6101.. quite common, fits a 2D40 or 3D40 hub. This one is a -18, ie 18 inches short of ‘design diameter’.. which makes it almost certainly T-6 through sheer weight of numbers though many and various rarer types used it, Stearman et al..

    Beermat
    Participant

    Signed

    in reply to: Brad Pitt Spitfire Owner #920934
    Beermat
    Participant

    Happened before. Colerne, near Bath, so it is assumed it’s in Somerset.. (I was paying attention 🙂 )

    in reply to: Can you ID this mysterious Spinner? #923262
    Beermat
    Participant

    Yep, I bow to those with wider knowledge. The absence of cut-outs should have been a clue 🙂

    (Still, I stand by the ‘impression of lightening holes’ theory).

    in reply to: Cosford Do-17 thread #923437
    Beermat
    Participant

    And I do wish people would quit slagging on the Hawkinge museum…they have reasons for their actions
    Has anyone ever nicely asked for a photo op?

    Me too – we (the Whirlwind Project) did just that, and they were very helpful and accommodating.

    ..ref the FSM thing, DX do have an FSM Spit I (ish) in Hangar 4.

    in reply to: Can you ID this mysterious Spinner? #923574
    Beermat
    Participant

    Can’t help much except to say the indentations are probably due to the skin of the spinner being forced back against the lightening holes of the forward ring inside. This looks like the VDM design common to many Axis aircraft in various shapes, sizes and number of holes (and later adopted by Rotol). Maybe someone with references can count ‘oles and compare?

    Regarding the hole in the front, the manufacturing process requires a small hole on which the metal is mounted to be formed.. by ‘spinning’. Sometimes these were plugged with a round cap (universally in British versions of the design), sometimes not..

    Beermat
    Participant

    Ha! You beat me to it, WF. That caught my eye too 🙂 Very interesting indeed. They kept a Welkin but set fire to and then buried a Whirlwind at about the same time?

    in reply to: A must for all "Battle of Britain" fans #925801
    Beermat
    Participant

    A generation taught by those who didn’t want to dwell on the war, perhaps.

    in reply to: Hartlepool sponsored Spitfires #927661
    Beermat
    Participant

    One thing – the ‘Andy Capp’ Spitfire is probably a false lead as the cartoon didn’t appear in the Mirror until 1957

    in reply to: Hartlepool sponsored Spitfires #927703
    Beermat
    Participant

    Can’t find those two – but are you aware of R7132 ‘Industria’ from West Hartlepool? http://fyldebbmfund.wordpress.com/gifts-of-war-presentation-spitfires/

    Ah – found this.. http://www.hartlepoolmail.co.uk/news/nostalgia/spitfire-s-history-recalled-1-3146659

    Can’t seem to see the full-size image, though? Just this – http://www.peterleestar.co.uk/webimage/1.3146653.1299255458!/image/3846898100.jpg_gen/derivatives/landscape_109/3846898100.jpg

    Maybe contact the paper?

    Darlington Spitfire story here – http://www.rogerdarlington.me.uk/Spitfire.html

    Also, W3315 “STOCKTON, THORNABY, BILLINGHAM AND TEES”

Viewing 15 posts - 2,626 through 2,640 (of 3,326 total)