dark light

Beermat

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 2,986 through 3,000 (of 3,326 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Canadian Hurricane question #1038045
    Beermat
    Participant

    I guess it’s the blades that are wrong for the Hurricane – pedantic point, but the hub is probably right – hence my follow up question to check – 23E50 on the Hurri, just like on a DC3?

    More pedantry, Camblobe – the P-47 would have a 24E50 (four blades)

    in reply to: Canadian Hurricane question #1038281
    Beermat
    Participant

    Thanks Camlobe

    So it’s fair to presume from this that the CCF Hurricanes, having Packard engines, used 23E50’s?

    Oh, and it’s also fair to say that our Whirlwind (having 4,000-series RH rotation DH CW props on a RR fine-spline SBAC4 shaft) had a licence-built equivalent of the 3DX40?

    in reply to: Press Association – Red Arrows #1038573
    Beermat
    Participant

    Hope you’re not serious, Bruce!

    in reply to: Press Association – Red Arrows #1038658
    Beermat
    Participant

    Suggestion

    Why not have a sticky thread called ‘idle speculation – warning, may contain nuts’ into which theorists can throw all ideas and satisfy the desire (which we all have from time to time) to throw in theories based on what we know.

    This thread can run forever, can be ignored at will – and anyone tempted to do their speculating on a thread like this one can be immediately directed there.

    in reply to: Canadian Hurricane question #1038676
    Beermat
    Participant

    My guess at the hub type would be 23EX.. 2 = hydro, 3 = number of blades, E = shank size X = accepts a ‘foreign’ (ie UK) shaft size.

    Any takers? Anon? Anneorac?

    ..cue debate over who has the bigger shaft sizes!

    in reply to: Canadian Hurricane question #1038719
    Beermat
    Participant

    Thank you Eddie, that was staring me in the face but it takes someone who knows stuff to point it out!

    According to William R Dunn (who flew CCF Hurris), in his autobiography ‘Fighter Pilot’, Hamilton Standard wouldn’t guarantee these props when enclosed in a spinner.

    So, next question is – what was the hub type / blade number? :diablo:

    in reply to: WANTED – Hurricane Undercarriage/Flap Control #1039095
    Beermat
    Participant

    Actually, I completely forgot – if you go on the Whirly site as per my signature, there’s some Hurricane woodwork that might be of interest to you.

    in reply to: Any WW2 RAF roundel experts ? #1039593
    Beermat
    Participant

    Gas patches?

    in reply to: WANTED – Hurricane Undercarriage/Flap Control #1039595
    Beermat
    Participant

    Thanks for the background – sounds like an interesting project. WARNING Hurricanes are fiddly!

    I’ll see what I can come up with next time I’m up at Gransden 🙂

    in reply to: Rob Davies on BBD Crash #1055613
    Beermat
    Participant

    It’s true, the circumstances of Robs escape still amaze me weeks later.

    Surprised to see a s***e paper like The Guardian running such a good article, thought they’d be too busy blaming the Tories for the riots:dev2:

    So.. you thought wrong. I suppose the moral is read the paper before calling it names – especially when it means bringing unecessary political prejudice into a forum that is better without it.

    in reply to: Bolingbroke 9048 Restoration Project Update #1057707
    Beermat
    Participant

    Thanks Andy! 🙂

    in reply to: WANTED – Hurricane Undercarriage/Flap Control #1057767
    Beermat
    Participant

    Hi

    As an apparent ‘newbie’ – can you tell us more about your project? I am particularly interested, for reasons that might become clear if you look at my previous posts..

    We might be able to help.

    Cheers,

    Matt

    in reply to: Bolingbroke 9048 Restoration Project Update #1057827
    Beermat
    Participant

    Hi Andy

    Good stuff – funnily enough I was looking for somebdy to talk to from that project! I have PM’d you some prop hub questions.. can you guess why?

    M

    in reply to: Why not work together materials data base #1052541
    Beermat
    Participant

    Excellent idea. It’s not all about expensive ‘aviation grade’ materials or components either. There are savings to be made (especially, but not uniquely) by going elsewhere for bits and pieces outside of the aviation world. For example – buy protective tape to put under fabric from Staples, and not a ‘well known aviation stockist’ and it’s less than half the price. I’d go further and suggest that tips like this, as well as guides and ‘how tos’ are also put onto this database.

    PS – Mike, can these dished holes be up to 5 inches across? If they can, I am VERY interested as well.

    in reply to: Production Engineering in WW2 #1079220
    Beermat
    Participant

    That’s a fair point. ‘Cottage Industry’ was the wrong term for me to use.

Viewing 15 posts - 2,986 through 3,000 (of 3,326 total)