But remember if it is multi-engined it has to be a Lanc and if it is a jet then the Red Arrows normally does, don’t know about choppers though, that is just too confusing but there aren’t too many of those so don’t need to worry about it!
Of course, if it’s at an airshow it’s a stunt-plane.
Got to admit, Fighters and Bombers do seem off-putting as words to the modern ear.
Being a member of the Cambridge Bomber and Fighter Society, I still haven’t had the nerve to put the sticker in the back of my car – what if the counter-terrorism people saw it?
I’m going to adopt my own suggestion. From now on, I’m an ‘Archaerologist’.
Archaero?
“No, dear, I’m NOT on a pub-crawl, I’m researching aviati ..avria… avish.. plane related pubs!”
Going to get positive intel on the beer status at the Mitre this afternoon, Moggy. The sacrifices that I make…
It might be possible to get through to the Express on [email]expressletters@express.co.uk[/email]
I’ve sent them a quick email asking for a correction.
What a masterstroke, putting Nathan’s excellent work on display in such an eyecatching context (ie with Spitfire) such that the powerful people present might read it and think.
Spitfireman Baz, hats off to you.
Hi RV7
http://www.britishpathe.com/record.php?id=82269
http://www.britishpathe.com/record.php?id=82270
and
http://www.britishpathe.com/record.php?id=82271
If you like hurricane bits, you’ll love these!
National intent as expressed through the actions of statesmen and politicians, personal intent and international business are three different things..
As a nation, it is a matter of political record that the US were happy to stay out of things at this time. This was a pragmatic and understandable choice, made somewhat inglorious by the moral argument especially as applied with hindsight.
Some young men, however, were happy to join up for altrusistic and/or thrill seeking reasons of their own.
And neither of these had any bearing on the provision of technology or facilities at a suitable price – as witness the contemporary Swiss approach. It is to the credit of the US decision-makers of the time that this wasn’t their model as well.
Much better idea than ‘we’ll meet by the Beaufighter’. We’ll meet by the Saunders!
Andy, do you mind arriving on a Space Hopper so that we know who you are?
At the last BAPC Meeting at Snibston it was advised that BAPC are seeking funding to try and allow the scheme to continue in some format – hopefully they can get something sorted out!
I really do hope so. As a ‘best practice’ guide for volunteers, it can only become increasingly valuable.
:confused: An interesting response when they’re a ‘partner’ in the scheme! http://www.nahsi.org.uk/
I know, that’s what I thought! There’s more to say about the IWM’s attitude to this course (the future of which is doubtful) but that’s another thread..
I think the lesson for anyone pursuing a dream, like Spitfire PR XIX, is that knowing an awful lot about old aeroplanes doesn’t make a blind bit of difference, sadly. Similarly, being exceptionally keen – going on that course, even being prepared to take a cut in salary – is no qualification to those on the ‘business’ side of the larger organisations.
If you want to work in administration at Duxford, you need degree-level qualifications – and experience – in business administration. If you want to work in curation, you’ll need experience – probably a degree – in curation.. and so on. I suspect if you want to clean toilets these days you need a degree in organic waste management.
I believe the sad truth is it’s never going to be like so many memoirs of the 20’s and 30’s. If you hang around an airfield looking bright and offering to polish things no-one is going to say ‘My, there’s a keen young fella-me-lad, I think I’ll make him my apprentice’. I was forty before I worked that one out!
Like many others here, I reckon your best bet, PRXIX, is focus on doing a degree. Then at the very worst you can get a decent job that allows you to do aviation things in your spare time.. and at the very best? The dream job. I reckon you’ll do all right 🙂
PS Having read your last post – don’t be TOO cynical, despite everything I’ve just said – generally individual people want to help, even when the ‘system’ doesn’t seem very friendly!
I’m interested to know – has anyone used their BAPC ‘National Aviation Heritage Skills Initiative’ qualification to help get a job in historic aviation?
In theory it is the ultimate vocational course for those who want to ‘break in’ professionally – I’m doing it at the mo, and it’s jolly useful and informative – but I wouldn’t recommend it solely as a step towards the career Spitfire PRXIX is after unless there was compelling evidence that it worked in one’s favour. Similarly, would any professionals out there in a position to actually employ people be swayed by this?
Edit – I am doing my course at Duxford. I mentioned this when being interviewed for an admin job with the IWM there – and I felt the level of interest in the room drop through the floor!
Well, it’ll help keep those horrible turbofans away.. 😉
not necessarily made up , there were a lot of pilots ( even women ferry pilots ) we mostly only hear of the top few of the few who were the outstanding ones
there were also a lot more english names than bader , tuck , et al but the others were in the shaddows of names like those ( even english )
such was the time and job you had to stand out to be a personality such as “sailor ” known for wearing a sowester ( nuts ?? ) most deffinateley as it certainly isn’t flying gear but he was remembered !!
I think you misunderstand – I wasn’t suggesting that because he was ‘unknown’ it meant he wasn’t a fighter pilot! I meant that the next generation of the family never learned the ‘gentleman’s name..
Sensitive area, please don’t ask for clarification, I’m sure you can understand – wish I hadn’t said it!
The assumption of line-shooting was more to do with him claiming to be a fighter pilot actually during the Battle of Britain (and I’m sure blokes in uniform tried that one on a lot), which – as this chap was Polish – seemed further-fetched to my friend (though his Grandma was insistent) before the documentary than it did after. Bear in mind, he knew nothing about the Battle of Britain, or even much about the war generally – which is standard for the vast majority of of the UK population.
It’s easy for those of us ‘in here’ to forget the general level of knowledge out there. It can easily seem unlikely that there would be Poles with the RAF at the time, as it did to my friend. This was the original point of my post – it was aimed at ‘them’, not ‘us’, and probably served its purpose very well.
‘Sailor’ – Do you mean Adolf Malan? I hadn’t heard about the sowester before! I thought the name came from a previous stint in the Merchant Navy.
OK, it’s a sample of one, but my mate watched the programme rapt, and he has no interest in aviation whatsoever. He’s an intelligent guy, but he said he learned things he had no idea about. Yes, it was ‘simplified’ and ‘dramatised’ or whatever – but it was never intended for us!
Incidentally he now has some questions about his ‘unknown’ Polish Grandad, whom his Grandma met at a dance in North London in 1940. He’d told her he was a fighter pilot, but my friend had always thought he was making that bit up…