So. You are angry that a newspaper gives voice to those with points of view contrary to your own?
So it’s not the political opinion, it’s that people are free to express it that gets John’s goat?
A coherent argument at last. Thank you, sir.
There is a logical flaw in it. however. Though it may not be to everyone’s liking, the ‘value’ placed on higher education is demonstrated by the fact that people are now prepared, if they can, to pay a lot of money for it. This commoditisation does lead to an increased focus on ‘business studies’, ‘management studies’ or vocational learning over attainment of knowledge and raised intellect for the sake of spiritual enrichment – which I would have thought you would applaud. You have shown a disdain for more abstract intellectual pursuits – your comment about actors is telling.
So yes, it’s true that education as a thing in itself has less value now than it did, but is this not a direct result of the Philistine tendency of the British ‘Greenite’ right?
On a previous point, the ‘Hitler couldn’t have been a leader because he was on the right’ argument does sound a bit silly. In the same way I wasn’t allowed to pick up a copy of ‘Mein Kampf’ that my History teacher had on his shelves. Not sure why it was there. But these are isolated, and the fact that we can all spot them for what they were suggests our education hasn’t been biased. It’s all about seeing unreasonable distortions and omissions, after all.
As for six discussions on Modern Philosophy containing one on Marx – that is because (as I am sure you will know if you attended them) Marxist Philosophy is a very specific departure from other brands, something of a ‘paradigm shift’. Similarly there is Marxist Archaeology and even Marxist Geography. Before you start sneering, John, it might be best to understand what these terms mean. The very fact that they are taught separately, with a name, and not just called ‘Archaeology’ or ‘Geography’ makes it abundantly clear to anyone prepared to think about it for a second that the inclusion of this alternative does not amount to brainwashing or indoctrination.
Edit – just noticed these were voluntary discussion groups, not even lectures. Are you suggesting that in your college the Marxist approach should not even be discussed? This, John, is where education can go badly wrong. Unless you want ignorant but effective automata who only know of Conservative-approved thought. Ah, but of course..
What on earth is ‘left wing’ advertising? Free means-of-production with every purchase?
I sense you are railing against something, but you don’t really know what it is.
That’s right, John. All academics only teach to spread communism. Universities should be controlled, with Government checks on what is said by whom. And you are not a swivel eyed loon. Now think nice thoughts about that lovely Mrs. Thatcher – yes, she might be PM one day – and Nurse will be along with your meds very soon.
The ‘volumes’ that this ‘screams” amount to the likelihood of the increasingly incoherent Telegraph (matching your own trajectory) publishing the letter being slim.
A long time ago there was an argument, which as a recent graduate of a ‘proper’ university I supported, that ‘University’ was the wrong name for Polytechnics. A lot of time has passed, and many former polies now have an academic ethos and a thriving research culture that is the envy of many “older’ institutions.
Once again you are late.
Thanks everyone! Very interesting stuff.
No, just waiting for a counter example that demonstates Redvood’s intellectual honesty.
The intellectual honesty required to attempt to mime the Welsh national anthem and fail – while Welsh Secretary?
No worries, A.C. Thanks for doing that.
Ralph, I’m sorry – I don’t have any more performance data on the Spitfire than the easily-available web stuff.
Hi
That data would be gold-dust for me – thanks.
Specifically, the earlier blades from the ’55’ series are of great interest –
Blade Assembly No. P.455960, Propeller type 55/14
Blade Assembly No. P.4551172T/A-17, Propeller type 55/8
Blade Assembly No. P.4551775A-17, Propeller type 55/21, 55/24
Blade Assembly No. P.4551778A-17, Propeller type 55/12
Also this apparent early 54 series one:
Blade Assembly No. P.454300A-42, Propeller type D20/445/2, D20/445/2, D20/445/4, D20/445/5
I am ready to have the theories blown away by some actual measurement – does the data include pitch/twist?
Can you explain the the logic of your claim that EU food will become cheaper to the consumer because the UK is not paying in to the CAP?
Does anyone know what the ‘A’ and ‘B’ suffixes meant? Was A post- 1938 twist revision? and B, like the Spitfire, meant twisted by telescoping?
Here it is:
[ATTACH=CONFIG]256499[/ATTACH]
Vermin, Fawlty.
So, the single industry on which the tories had placed the future of our economy after destroying all of the others is now moving out.
What an enormous ****-up we have managed to make. Well, not ‘we’. I neither voted conservative or leave.
I couldn’t get the Spitfire geometry as shown in the RM to make sense. But then I discovered that if you use the US convention of centering everything on the 42 inch station along the blade regardless of blade diameter or 0.7 R/r or whatever..
Everything snaps into place. Here is a diagram showing how a constant pitch variation with length – that gave ‘butter-cutting’ twist at 25 degrees at 42 inches – was completely messed up by de Havilland in their keen-ness to give the Spit blade butter-cutting ability at 15 degrees.
This the new blade had – around the 0.7r mark, which everyone agreed was all-important. However, the blade now had two pitch distributions, an inboard terminating at the beginning of the telescope, around 33 inches out, and an outboard one that met the new thinking about the correct angle of ‘constant pitch’ being a lot less than actual constant speed blade angle – 15 degrees less.
EDIT – THIS IS WHERE I WANTED TO PUT THE KILLER DIAGRAM, BUT THE FORUM UPLOAD PROBLEM HAS STRUCK