CD’s point is a very important one. My research into an article on the P-38 has opened my eyes to the real answer to so many enthusiasts’ ‘why didn’t they….’ type questions. Money. These are private companies with bottom lines, who are in turn paid by a department with a budget, who in turn are funded by a government with its own bottom line. Hurricanes were 33% cheaper, and Hawker’s were tooled up to manufacture in quantity even before the first flight of the Spitfire. The Spitfire had to be considerably better to have been ordered at all, and as alertken says, it was done with some trepidation.
Not such a close ally – Clive Lewis left the shadow cabinet in February after being whipped into accepting the triggering of article 50. He is still sore about it. He has put himself onto the lunatic fringe, and I doubt Jeremy answers his calls.
John , can you please expand on your theory that UK housing became a traded commodity because of left-wing educationalists?
Or maybe save the G and T’s until after posting?
John et al. Sorry to have to bring it back to 2017, but what has any of this got to do with the Left? How on earth can anyone make a connection between years of Tory government, ‘that tit’ Blair, the mess our police service is in, an inadequate justice system and… left wing politics? Has no one on the right noticed there is no possible connection and there hasn’t been for a very long time!
That mantra often repeated by the right – take responsibility for your actions – applies completely here.
‘Europhile civil servants’.. you’d rather they hated Europe? Would that make them better civil servants in your eyes?
The civil service does not run the government, but it has been running the country for a very long time. It is what they are for. Governing where it is being run TO is the job of government, and currently it feels like there’s no-one at the helm.
In the meantime our Treasury and Foreign Office civil servants will continue engaging positively with the bureaucracies of Europe because that is what they do, and no-one has told them not to.
The conditions that led to the vote will be studied for a long time. What leads a nation to vote for its own degradation?
Perhaps a sense that we were being dumped on, and some people telling us it was those foreigners doing the dumping. Echoes from the past, maybe, but the fact is we are no more ‘free’ or democratically governed under a 42% minority government (who are, incidentally, bitterly divided and totally ineffective) than before when we were part of a system that 48% voted for.
Food for thought, Paul, thank you.
While I agree on your last point, and I agree that John’s is a noble sentiment I suppose my doubt is whether actual sovereignity ever left our shores, whatever one makes of the ECJ. I certainly don’t get a sense of totalitarianism from Brussels.
Not being sarcastic or disingenuous, I always believed that the law-making arm of the EU and the trading-bloc part were seperate entities? The Times article makes little sense to me – is anyone suggesting we had give up sovereignity to enjoy the benefits of the single market – were they not, originally, two different concepts (does anyone remember the EEC and what iit stood for)? Can they not be again?
Perhaps understanding the distinction and a plan for each ‘pillar’ might inform a second referendum.
Guardian doing itself no favours there. Fair point as an aside, but as an article it reads like being cornered by a tedious PC undergraduate.
Go on John, set it up there for you!
I sent my complaint to the generic enquiries email last week. No acknowlegement yet.
Thanks!
Nice piece..
There’s a Duxford disposal part of eBay? Help, I can’t find it!
This is sickeningly distasteful. What on earth has happened to the RAFM? Those who fought were ‘the people’s’ because that is who they were risking their lives for. It wasn’t a TV talent show. The people behind it have to know, but they don’t read this forum. I suggesst we all write to them? I will start.
It would be better if eBay allowed comments.
Yes, thanks for posting. It did raise a much-needed laugh, seeing the kind of audience this ‘populist’ twit has been reduced to.
Popular Front of Judea indeed. And what was his message? Ordinary German Workers.. blah.. need bilateral deals… blah…
Yes Nigel. The sort that were in place until.. no, I can hear heads being rammed into sand.
Oh yes, and criticise the press for trying to pull them out again.
What on earth does ‘Mainstream media’ mean, anyway? As John likes to remind us gloatingly most Brits like to read anti-left and anti-liberal propaganda as the bulk of their current affairs intake. So it can’t mean that.
It is safe.
Contrary to a lop of crap out there cookies do not steal your email, or eat your firstborn. They are not traded for money (they are only little text files given to youtr browser by the site) and have nothing to do with dodgy activities or spam.
Most of the time they give you a randomly-generated unique ID against a site so that the site knows its you the next time you are on any page of it, so as to present more useful stuff to you. They CAN be used to target advertising (so they do have commercial value) but not increase the amount of it as that is down to page design.
Most professional sites use cookies. The general web etiquette is to announce the fact. And give the option of rejecting them.