Refugee bs. That’s not really understanding what is happening. How many refugees would wish to attack the nation that took them in? Indeed, how many of the 9/11 perpetrators were in fact refugees? Come to mention it, how many came from countries on the list, and how many actually came from Saudi Arabia, which is not?

No one is arguing that he isn’t doing what he said he would, or that in his head he isn’t putting America first.

Doesn’t make it a) smart or b) right.

One can say the same when it comes to corruption in private schools – and an awful lot worse. My father taught Physics and was a housemaster for 20 years in a minor public school, retiring only last year. Some of the things he was asked to do in exchange for bribes, mostly from Chinese and Russian parents, would make your curlies straighten.

Capitalism unleashed.

Thanks for explaining Obamacare. I admit it seems complicated to this Brit, who pays his taxes and has a health service, plain and simple. Of course, this won’t last.

Re. Impeachment – it may be pissing in the wind, I suppose it would require an outbreak of non-partisan principle among both the ‘establishment’ and the New Order for it to be anything else.

It looks like a part of the campaign is to promote this very idea.

Pravda.. a Freudian reference to that long repressed belief in the inherant truth of socialism, John?*

One side is going to quote Pravda, the other Volkischer Beobachter. Either way, that’s where the ‘evidence’ is to support the argument – it wouldn’t appear in the other. You can’t hold that against anyone. It’s faking news.. what used to be called lying.. by the news media that’s the issue here. Some do, some don’t.

*not serious

Testing testing one two one two. Ok, back. And frontal lobes functioning.

Which means I can point out that the ‘revolutionary’ bit highlighted by the ex-judge is an order that allows a beaurocrat – at his or her own individual ‘discretion’ – to invoke ‘individual over government’ when deciding whether the rule of law applies to a fellow citizen. Not just whether they should pay their taxes, but in any case where a beaurocrat is responsible for applying law.

If this is meant to reduce the power of beaurocracy, drain swamps etc.. Can you see a flaw in this, RpR? How this may not have been thought through? I’m sure the judge can, but Fox would fire him for mentioning it.

I do not deny anything. That’s your false assumption and one that is made too often when shouting at the minority.

Being in a majority or having your will enacted democratically – which the pro-Europeans I know accept has happened and agree is the only thing that should happen – does not in itself say anything about relative cleverness. Nothing at all.

If you can not see rare principle behind a local MP resigning rather than obey a three-line-whip on a vote that runs contrary to the majority view of her own constituents then you wouldn’t recognise it anywhere.

By the way, we have suffrage. I am not sure some voters in the referendum are likely to grow balls any time soon.

Respect.