John – ‘liberal left’.. I don’t want to write it again, and cut-and-paste seems dismissive. But take a look at the Farage thread. Liberal left – it’s a logical jmpossibility. Libertarian left. Do you mean the SDLP, or the.. ahem.. Greens?
Or is there some bogeyman party behind the media, somehere off the scale to the bottom left of Mycroft’s diagram? Or.. and I sense I am getting warm.. you are so rammed into that top-right corner that the centre of the cross-hairs is ‘extreme’ Libertarian left to you?
Yep. There are very few who would vote ‘politically correct’ as if that were any kind of useful political philosophy. As a movement, the libertarian left does not really exist in the UK. The ‘liberal’ left never has – in fact it would be hard for adherents of left or right to be liberal, as it involves being able to entertain ideas and ways of thinking opposite to your own existing one – and potentially take them on. By definition a tricky one for a loyal party member or an idealogue. To be liberal, the Liberal party had to be libertarian as an idiology in it’s own right. I suppose I am saying there is a connection, though they are not the same thing.
Now I am going to lie down somewhere dark.
Going back a bit.. you caught me being a bit pedantic. In fact I do agree with the basic point made by that table or diagram or whatever. Still, you will see that while your opponents may be libertarian or left, it is much rarer for them to be both. This impression that some in the top-right sector have that their opposition is a homogenous bottom left sector is totally false. Instead, we have you surrounded!
Mycroft. So from your table, I can conclude that a) you meant ‘libertarian left’ but used the wrong word and b) everyone who doesn’t agree with you belongs to the Green Party or the SDLP?
You really are confused. Deep breath. Read a book.
No one is making reaching claims about who did what apart from you claiming anyone who doesn’t agree with you being the ‘liberal left’, which is a made up term. As far as I can gather it means ‘people who think stuff through’.
Not sure the road to Damascus is a good thing. I have heard it is full of swarthy foreign types.
The “funny ‘cos it’s true” was a deliberate cultural reference. Probably lost on the over 90’s.
Conjour I will own up to!
Who twisted your melon, anyway? Bit close to the JG bone, was I?
It’s not often I spill my beer laughing.. it”s funny cos it’s true.
John, don’t read this. The images it conjours for you might be too much at your age.
Mycroft..you ask everyone you personally know their A level results, how many universities they applied to and for which course? You must do to have a sample size big enough to get 8 with identical subjects and results, all of whom tried applying for the same course at at least six institutions and all of whom were refused? Coughbull****cough.
Yes
The entire population of England could go and live in Belgium if they wanted to, as well.
Madness alright.
Mycroft, do you ‘buy’ basic demographics? Or that getting A’s does not by itself mean automatic selection for any degree course, including (and especially) medicine?
My auntie has Medieval History, English Lit and Sociology ‘A’s. ..but thank the Lord she’s not a doctor!
John.. the ‘extremist liberal left’ makes as much sense as ‘the bright black orange’.
Never thought I’d agree so much.
Not entirely, though.. I am not sure ‘entitlement to live and travel where they want’ is a motive for European federalists. That freedom comes with money, not Federalism, surely?
Their are many shades of ‘Liberal’ – and many misuses of the term. There is confusion aplenty here. Like the chap on the radio this morning complaining of ‘European Liberals saying that an onion has to be a particular shape’.
No freedom under this liberal regime. We need an illiberal one – that’ll give us back our liberties.. who needs logic anyway?
But ‘regressive liberals’ I like!