dark light

Beermat

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1,261 through 1,275 (of 3,326 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: General Discussion #260077
    Beermat
    Participant

    What, eating a bacon sandwich?

    Goddam aileen preverts!

    in reply to: General Discussion #260092
    Beermat
    Participant

    On a more serious note.. the peculiar resolving effect of observation upon quantum events (that hard to spell cat again) might be a clue as to where conciousnesses (ours or others) fit in to the universe. Again, there are some very good books on this, curiously mostly written by UK based physicsts.

    in reply to: General Discussion #260097
    Beermat
    Participant

    Of course – in porn there’s a lot of simulation going on.. Hang on.. That explains everything! We’re all in a porn film for a higher intelligence. QED.

    in reply to: General Discussion #260141
    Beermat
    Participant

    Bedtime reading John: http://www.metric.org.uk/metrication-timeline – or is this more Acadamie Francaise propaganda, as part of their drive to make you use Kilos in revenge for the English language? Interested in your source for that assertion. You wouldn’t make it up, would you?

    in reply to: General Discussion #260148
    Beermat
    Participant

    I don’t make it up, John. When in doubt I look it up. You should try it sometime – start with the spelling of Armageddon. Which bit did I make up? The bits where I bring you up on points of fact?

    Snafu, I’m not taking it as a complement. I don’t know John personally, and this may not be the case here, but my doubt comes from the old folk I do know who benefitted from a public school education but still believe every word the Telegraph prints. Sadly many wouldn’t recognise genuine intelligence if it bit them on their pile-ridden arses*

    John, I haven’t threatened you with prison or anything else and I don’t care which system you use. As I have said. There’s some made up stuff in this thread, but it ain’t coming from me.

    *This has proved a b*gger for our secret services over the years

    in reply to: General Discussion #260256
    Beermat
    Participant

    Odd dictionary you must be using. Explains a lot, though.

    So, you reject an abstract yet practical and widely (very nearly universally) adopted system of metrics – an entirely mathematical concept – because it is (based on your clearly limited historical knowledge and ropey dictionary) French?

    Hope you never need a blood transfusion (Jean Baptiste Denys) – you might reject that too.

    in reply to: General Discussion #260317
    Beermat
    Participant

    “Metrication means French”

    No, it doesn’t. Even if you accept the common usage of the word metric, as does the Collins dictionary, it still means “the process in which a country, organization etc starts using the metric system of measurements”. That is not the same as ‘French’.

    Napoleon said (using the proper term ‘decimal’ for what we are arguing about) “The scientists adopted the decimal system on the basis of the metre as unit. Nothing is more contrary to the organization of the mind, memory and imagination. The new system will be a stumbling block and source of difficulties for generations to come. It is just tormenting the people with trivia”. (Memoirs of the History of France During the Reign of Napoleon, As dictated by Napoleon, Volume 4, pp.203)

    Bleedin’ foreigners, eh? Can’t even be relied on to get their own memoirs right.

    in reply to: General Discussion #260321
    Beermat
    Participant

    Outrage!

    OK, enough of those who think and comment on such things seem concerned. Not the ‘rest of the world’.

    in reply to: General Discussion #260412
    Beermat
    Participant

    It happened on Monday, 20 killed. Wasn’t it in the Torygraph? Still working on how to blame socialists, single mothers or immigrants for it, are they? Or too busy rattling on over the failed actions of a saddo in the US?

    in reply to: General Discussion #260422
    Beermat
    Participant

    First let’s get rid of the misnomer.. which I used as well. Metrication really means the application of metrics – another word for ‘measurement’. At some particular intellectual low-point the British decided to confuse ‘metric’ with ‘decimal’. Probably because the proposers of the decimal system referred to it as a new system of metrics.

    After the French revolution it was thought a good idea to revise metrics so that long-distance trade could be simplified. The chosen standard system of decimaly-related metric units had existed as a concept in Europe since at least the seventeenth century, and had been proposed for the US by Thomas Jefferrson as early as the American Revolution.

    The size of units (metrics) is one arbitrary consideration, and makes little odds (think spanners). Its how they devide or multiply into each other that is the contention. The decimal system uses the same ‘base’ throughout – in this case 10 because that is how our counting system works. The imperial system uses a varying base depending both on what units you are using and what property is being measured. The latter simply does not make as much sense.

    However, if you want to use it it really should be your choice!

    State school, John. While yours was telling you Napoleon devised ‘the metric system’.

    in reply to: General Discussion #260426
    Beermat
    Participant

    Not really.

    in reply to: General Discussion #260427
    Beermat
    Participant

    Oh no, they got him half way through his post!

    in reply to: General Discussion #260431
    Beermat
    Participant

    RPR. The rest of the world is genuinely worried about ‘your man’ getting in. Does that not mean anything to you? Those able to think about the future of the world outside America are concerned about who you are about to put behind the wheel.

    Let’s make (insert country here) great again’.. that is the line used by leaders taking their country down into ‘rogue nation’ status. I guess when you are in the middle of it it’s harder to see.

    Whatever you feel about ‘the lying old broad’ (very high level of political discourse you Trump guys demonstrate), she isn’t a threat on that kind of level.

    Also, voting is not compulsory in the US, so it isn’t one or the other?

    I am interested in the use of ‘talking points’ as a negative thing. First being liberal (OED: Adjective – Willing to respect or accept behaviour or opinions different from one’s own; open to new ideas) became a bad thing, now discussing stuff is also bad. Its like political aspergers.

    in reply to: General Discussion #260552
    Beermat
    Participant

    Got to agree – no harm in both systems being available.

    Point of order though. Napoleon did not invent the metric system. Far from it – it had been around for a long while by his time – and he didn’t much like it.

    in reply to: General Discussion #260558
    Beermat
    Participant

    Talking of concience – you must feel pretty bad about the bombing of the aid convoy that you were complicit in by not mentioning here.

Viewing 15 posts - 1,261 through 1,275 (of 3,326 total)