Thank you!
They shoulda had an F-102 or F-106. 🙂
It’s very likely that no one working on the show knew the difference!
I doubt they would sacrifice the safety of their men and women for just the WOW effect :rolleyes:.
You haven’t seen too many two-stars and above in action, have you?
According to the old saying, “If she looks good, she’ll fly good!”
It would probably appear as background radiation to non-AESA radar. But to AESA radar (on opposing force 5th gen aircraft), the pulse should be amplified sufficiently to be recognizable. AESA radars have 2 – 3 times the sensitivity of non-AESA radars.
Why?
I saw a diagram showing a max dry speed of Mach 1.75 at 35.000 ft.
Just havn’t been able to re-find it.
The top dry speed was significantly less at 60.000 ft
In other words, the F-22 flight envelope (altitude/airspeed) is shaped like that of a conventional fighter, not distorted like that of the SR-71.
I’ll bet that if one could get a look at a real altitude/Mach (H-M) diagram for the F-22 one would see a big blob of specific excess power (P sub S) right around M=1.5 at 35,000 ft.
If you find the diagram, please post it.
Why? Or do you think they look exactly the same? Do you really not see any difference?
If you can accept a gratuitous assertion from an anonymous DoD authority, I can accept my own analysis as equally valid.
Hyperbolic exaggeration of one’s own capabilities while ignoring similar developments on the part of others is standard operating procedure in the American defense community.
Yes you can consider it to be all aspect, as long as Sukhoi and NPO Saturn do their due diligence and engineer the correct finishing details. Remember, the T-50 that recently flew is a flying qualities airplane at the present time. To become operationally useful, dozens of different stealthy details must be completed. Those details are not trivial and it will take time and money to complete them.
With the prime minister giving the T-50 close to an absolute national priority (right up there with the Strategic Rocket Forces) money does not seem to be a problem. Time requirements will be eased by having cash. All Sukhoi has to do is be about as competent as Lockheed Martin.
Um, no. The F-35 has all aspect stealth. It’s nozzle is specifically designed to be VLO. The F-35 RCS Pole model has already been up on the perch and guess what…. it met all expectations. The DoD, JPO, and LM have always claimed all-aspect stealth and no credible source has been able to state otherwise.
While it may not have the RCS reduction numbers of the F-22, it is still considered all-aspect VLO.
If that is the case, then we can “consider” the T-50 to be all aspect VLO also!