dark light

Flatcat

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 55 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Bit of Australian aviation history #979648
    Flatcat
    Participant

    Reading this thread, why did that saying “Better to keep your mouth closed and be thought a fool than to open it and be proven one” come to mind – hence why my post count is so low 😀

    in reply to: RAAF F.111 announcement #1018061
    Flatcat
    Participant

    Great news to hear, being only a little up the road from work. :):)

    in reply to: RAAF F.111 announcement #1028286
    Flatcat
    Participant

    Great news to hear, being only a little up the road from work. :):)

    in reply to: General Discussion #247408
    Flatcat
    Participant

    Well, that and spending 15 yrs working the full gammet of maintenance jobs from BAe 146 assembly at Woodford to the line at in Boeings and Airbus’s in NZ and Oz leaves me wondering exactly where all the little bits of plumbing and such really are fitted. But if I mention that then I know it makes me one of the few, sorry, many sworn to secrecy or planted as disinformation agents…..:D:D

    in reply to: The Chem-Trails conspiracy again #1840785
    Flatcat
    Participant

    Well, that and spending 15 yrs working the full gammet of maintenance jobs from BAe 146 assembly at Woodford to the line at in Boeings and Airbus’s in NZ and Oz leaves me wondering exactly where all the little bits of plumbing and such really are fitted. But if I mention that then I know it makes me one of the few, sorry, many sworn to secrecy or planted as disinformation agents…..:D:D

    in reply to: General Discussion #247413
    Flatcat
    Participant

    The bit I don’t quite understand is if these chemtrails are there to drop a concoction of chemicals on us, and proof that the exist is the fact the hang in the air longer than a standard contrail then don’t the two contradict each other? Shouldn’t the intent be that they actually dissipate quickly over a wide area so that we actually get covered in the stuff rather than just watch it float over our heads?

    in reply to: The Chem-Trails conspiracy again #1840788
    Flatcat
    Participant

    The bit I don’t quite understand is if these chemtrails are there to drop a concoction of chemicals on us, and proof that the exist is the fact the hang in the air longer than a standard contrail then don’t the two contradict each other? Shouldn’t the intent be that they actually dissipate quickly over a wide area so that we actually get covered in the stuff rather than just watch it float over our heads?

    in reply to: Douglas DC-3 ZK-AZL #946071
    Flatcat
    Participant

    She’s got to be one of my earliest memories of the Fielddays at Mystery Creek. Looking good.

    in reply to: GoPro shots (B-24 and P-51 content) #1010670
    Flatcat
    Participant

    Hmmmmm, standing in the Bombay when the drop???

    in reply to: Where Are You Posting From? #1855636
    Flatcat
    Participant

    Need to try and rebalance the world, a Kiwi living in Adelaide, South Australia.

    in reply to: General Discussion #268362
    Flatcat
    Participant

    Need to try and rebalance the world, a Kiwi living in Adelaide, South Australia.

    in reply to: A380 having a cracking time #553581
    Flatcat
    Participant

    I’ve inspected a few airframes over the years, and in general, are cracks good?
    Of course not, but are they always reason to ground a plane -no.

    Remembering designing a plane (or most things for that matter) is complex and it’s not all about making it so strong it won’t break.

    There’s the bit about ensuring that if it does crack how to limit the propagation of it by design (think say, 3 piece spars, if a crack develops it can only travel to the edge of the material)

    Then there’s redundancy in load paths, so if a crack does develop then the load can transfer through other joints.

    Then there is inspection frequencies, they are not chosen by a random number generator, but by careful calculation on expected failure rates, after all these cracks were not found after the wing fell off, but during a maintenance process.

    The design teams hopefully have applied learnings from others failures, in particular to the aluminium components, but remember that FRP components have been in use for many years now too. It would be a brave man to say it won’t happen, but it would be a foolish man to discount the engineering knowledge that has gone into any modern aircraft.

    in reply to: Smart Alec Replies #1859491
    Flatcat
    Participant

    A small amendment

    The Internet is mostly populated by people who are under the impression they are right and everyone else is wrong. Just ignore them 😎

    in reply to: General Discussion #273449
    Flatcat
    Participant

    A small amendment

    The Internet is mostly populated by people who are under the impression they are right and everyone else is wrong. Just ignore them 😎

    in reply to: Whats the one…………… #1862869
    Flatcat
    Participant

    I’ve done two, one in Queenstown at 99 metres and one in Taupo at 65 metres. Both scared the **** out of me. And I have to say, just watching the video of this one made my toes curl up.

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 55 total)