What about the F-110, they built thousands of them.
Hi All, I was reading the new issue of Today’s Pilot this morning,
which has an interesting article on Raymond Baxter. On one page there
is a beautiful drawing of a high-back MkXVI – LO-X, which is described
as Raymond’s personal Spitfire when he was the commander of ‘A’ flight,
602 squadron in 1945. It’s TB382!
Did the Todays Pilot give a date for this as Baxter also flew a mark XVI while with 602 Sqn at Ludham in Feb 45 which was LO-X SM388 (Allan125 sent me a scan from Baxters last book of his log book for Feb 1945 and I’ve got a Digital Photo of the the Squadron ORB for the same dates and the sorties for X in the logbook and SM388 in the F541 match).
No, Bicycles were called bikes before motor bicycles existed.
Yes, I am being Obstinate… when have you ever heard of an Exocet being called a monoplane, or a biplane, or any sort of plane? How about a Sidewinder… or perhaps a Tomahawk? Without a human crew it is a rocket or a missile or an unmanned aerial vehicle.
Sidewinder is in fact a 5in rocket with a seeker head attached and I would not call it anything but a rocket. Exocet is not a monoplane, as it has cruciform wings (i.e. an X platform). As for Tomahawk, lets give it designation like the first missile ever deployed by the US Air Force, that was also a GLCM. The weapon’s name was Matador and its original designation in service was B-61A!! (like B for BOMBER), oh and it was a Monoplane as well. Bomarc’s original designation was XF-99 (as in F for Fighter) and the programs original goal was to produce a pilotless Interceptor AIRCRAFT!!!! as until 1955 the Bomarc was designated as a Ground-to-Air Pilotless Aircraft.
As far as the Bloodhound in service with the RAF, each Bloodhound had its own F700 aircraft log book, it was serviced by aircraft Technicians (Riggers, Sooties, Plumbers (and from 1987 onward Aircraft Fairies). Aircraft engineering practices were operated and as far as most of the blokes that worked on it were concerned it was an AIRCRAFT as it was built like an aircraft, it was fuelled with Avtur like an normal paraffin burner and its method of control when in flight was similar to that a conventional aircraft (as it was for Bomarc). Grounded Aircrew (usually after banging out one time too many) liked it as well as they were the only Fighter Squadrons (the Bloodhound Squadrons considered themselves to be fighter squadrons) that they could command and fight with if the time came.
Now I never mentioned the term aircraft in the opening part of the thread, however if I do change the name, it will be to GROUND TO AIR PILOTLESS AIRCRAFT, which is a correct definition of this thread.
As for the last line, do I have to take my RC model Aircraft back to the shop and complain that it should have been called an RC Model UAV and I think I should complain about this http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Model_airplane. I don’t think I will get very far.
An aircraft does not to have a human crew in it as the original name for an aircraft without a pilot, was funnily enough a PILOTLESS AIRCRAFT.
and anyway I would say that the Blue Envoy, which was the planned replacement for Bloodhound 1 had a very fine pair of Monoplane Wings.
GarryB you have lost the argument, please STFU
Do you mean a model or the real thing? 😀
Model unfortunately 😡
There is a small model of a site at the Thrope Camp visiors centre at Woodhall Spa, showing the layout of the 222 Squadron site there from 1960 -1964. (32 Airfix Bloodhound kits on that one)
The problem with doing the real thing is that there are only two sites in the UK where I know you could do it, Misson near Finningly and at Woolfox Lodge, next to the A1 between Wittering and Cottesmore (and the problem with Misson is that you would have to move a lot of ex army land rovers and other vehicles first). The other problem is that most of the equipment, bar some missiles and launchers where scrapped in 1963/64 (The majority of the missiles had the explosives, fuel and secret bits removed and were burnt on the airfield’s were the sites were located.).
A Standard RAF Bloodhound Mark 1 Air Defence Missile (ADM) Squadron (the term SAM Squadron not being used until 1962) consisted of Two Fire Units and a number of support facilities. Each Fire Unit consisted of a Launch Control Post building, a Work Services Building, Two Type 83 target Illuminating radars (made up of a Antenna Trailer and a Display cabin), 16 launchers and Launcher Plant Assemblies (LPA), plus cable and air pipe ducting.
The Launch Control Post (LCP) was the heart of the Fire Unit and was manned up a Launch Control officer and two operators. Each operator was responsible for the operation for one half of the Fire Unit, which was divided into two Sections. The sections were known by the manufacturer as A and B sections. The Equipment in the LCP consisted of the LCO’s control desk, the A and B Section operator control positions and a number of electronics racks that were used to prepare the missile for launch. The equipment racks were again separated into A and B sections and in the whole one section controlled one TIR and 8 Launchers to the right hand side of the fire unit and the other the TIR and 8 launchers to the left.
Each TIR, as noted was made up of two trailer mounted cabins. The antenna trailer contained the main radars. Note I say two as the Type 83 was made up of a pair of radar Transmitter / Receivers that both transmitted and received through the same parabolic dish assembly. The lower frequency (S-band) system was used to acquired the target (the lower frequency giving a wider field of view). After that system had acquired the target and locked on, the higher frequency (X-band) system would switch in to provide a much narrower field of view (Beam width in radar man speak), that was used for fine target tracking and target illumination for the missile(s).
An operator manned the display cabin, and he steered the radar onto the target under lamp order control form the Section operator in the LCP. When the radar had acquired the target. The radar operator would switch in auto tracking and just monitor the systems, until required to engage another target. The operator in the LCP, on command of the LCO, would run up the missiles on his section and carry out the required preparation for launch. Most of this was automatic and mainly consisted of tuning the missile’s radar receivers to match the frequency and Pulse Repartition Frequency of that section TIR. (Each TIR transmitted a different frequency and PRF to the TIR’s near it. This was used to ensure that each missile would home on the target that was being illuminated by its TIR, and not onto another target being illuminated by another section on the Squadron.
The 8 launchers were turned on to the firing bearing and the dish was steered to point at the target. (The launcher control system was fitted with equipment that stopped the missiles from being fired on certain bearings. These bearings were known as Taboo zones, and covered areas were you did not want the missiles spent boost motor casings to land. The LCP equipment would offset the launchers to an angle that would allow the dish on the missile to track the target during the missiles boost phase, when the missile was essentially a ballistic object.)
The missile was fitted with a twin channel radar receiver, one picking the radar transmitter pulse up on an aerial mounted at the rear of the missile and the other receiver was fed by from the dish at the front. The rear channel was locked in frequency and PRF to its TIR, and the forward dish was locked on to the target. When the missile was fully run up, the target was within the missiles fuel range, the Signal to Noise ratio on the forward channel was strong enough, and the dish control system was automatically tracking the target, The equipment in the LCP gave the operater the Free to Fire indication, and the fire button could be pressed.
When this happened, the ramjet igniters were fired and two seconds later the missile boosts were going as well and it was missile away. Each section could fire salvos of up to four missiles at one target at a time. The Work Services Building provided stand by power and pressurised air for missile electronics cooling. This air was piped to the launcher Plant assemblies for each launcher. The LPA cooled the air and feed it to the launcher and on to the missile. The LPA also provided pressurised hydraulics oil to the launcher and on to the missile to pressurise the missiles hydraulics system and provided oil pressure to run the missiles hydraulic motor generator that powered the missiles electronics. The launcher supported the missile and was turned by an electrical motor via a servo system linked to the equipment in the LCP. The other buildings on the site contained missile servicing equipment and bays, fuelling areas, explosive areas for fitting the warhead, ramjet igniter and boost motors, plus the usual admin and security buildings.
The layout of a Fire Unit is shown, plus a photo of the site at Misson (and one of the firing pads actually has a Bloodhound Mark 1 on It.) photo used with permission of site owner.
I’ve got photos of the LCP and WSB at Woolfox Lodge, that I will post at a later date.
Just something for anybody who would like to build their only little Bloodhound 1 Fire Unit (that was the name that was used by Bristol’s and the RAF for a Bloodhound Battery). A full Fire Unit was a couple of brick buildings (Launch Control Post and Works Services Building), 16 launchers and LPA’s, and two radars (a fire unit could engage 2 targets at the same time, and two FU’s made a Squadron, with the exception of 264 Squadron at North Coates who had 3, however they were never all operational at the same time). Find attached the dimensions and layout of the Type 83 Target Illuminating Radar. It was made up of two mobile wagons, one for the transmitter / receiver and aerial, and the other for display and control.
Well Nuff said about the Raytheon Patriot on a Bloodhound thread! Sadly I don’t think the RAF is ever going to return to the days of proper big SAM systems anytime soon.
I think the actual term will be never, as the RAF are canning Rapier as well in two years time (all the batteries are going to the Army). However the RAF will be still involved in the Command and Control (Which was the reason for them going into the SAM business in the first place).
If the Lottery win comes in BIGVERN1966 I think you can probably think bigger than a model kit! There are still a few complete Bloodhound battery’s in various museums which could be obtained for enough pennies. Maybe you could buy a SA2 Guideline as well to allow an interesting contrast.
If the Lottery win happens, I would like to start a Model kit company that would product some decent kits for me to build in all of that spare time that I would have to kill, like 1-32 RAF Phantom FG1/FRG2, 1-32 Scale RAF Buccaneer S2, 1-32 Scale Sea Vixen, 1-72 RAF Valiant, 1-72 scale Shack AEW 2, and all of those other British aircraft that nobody else will touch, as well as the Bloodhounds. However I do know of a big green Bristol Dog that would become a Big White Bristol Dog (it lives near and empty bunker) if the balls come in.
Thanks for the Pathe link I will enjoy looking at those.
P.S. Do you have anything to do with the bhmk2.net site?
🙂 What do you think? 😉 🙂
Yes, that’s the one! weighs a ton (not literally but you have to lift it in yourself, and it was about as much as I could carry), then takes several hours to tune up – switch on to full power and “pop”, there she blows, back to start all over again – after you’ve drained the water cooling system, of course. Never seen so much waveguide in all my life before or since, and murderous to tune!
No scale on the photo, but those klystrons were about 18 inches high and pretty solid metal.
Thanks for reviving more memories, BigVern, I will have to go to Switzerland soon (was that where the photo came from?)
Yep they are not light, I’ve only carried one once and that was into a museum from out the boot of somebody’s car (well, Corkscrew’s car actually). As well as weighing a lot, be advised, don’t wear a watch when moving it or your wrist will be stuck to it (The thing is fitted with a very powerful magnet).
The photo was taken at the Gubel Bloodhound Air Defence Guided Missile Position BL-64 ZG (BLOODHOUND FLIEGERABWEHR LENKWAFFENSTELLUNG BL-64 ZG) in Switzerland. (The BL-64 was the Swiss designation for Bloodhound Mark 2 and the ZG stands for the canton in which the site is located (in this case Zug). The museum is run by MHSZ (they have a web site (in German)) and is unfortunately only open on certain days of the year and you have to book your visit first (or you may get there and find the place shut, as if they don’t have a tour booked, they don’t open).
Of course, having sweated blood getting the T87 going (twice) from giant Airfix kits (about 30 tons if I remember correctly) it hurts to see all the glory going to a little monoplane which wouldn’t know the general direction of where to go without our contribution! In fact we guided it all the way up to the proximity fuse lock-on, about 99.9% of the way, eluding jammers and all sorts of cr*p!
How I miss my 87 now, memories flooding back! You had to love the thing to stand all its idiosyncracies, like the time I blew a dozen 2 kW water-cooled klystrons and thought it was my fault until eventually the manufacturers owned up that it had been a bad batch. I think those things cost about as much as a missile each!
Would not happen to be one of these by any chance? 🙂
OK, BigVern, but I assumed the kit would be a Mk 2, the only (operational) Bloodhounds I ever saw!
No Offence intended, Papa Lima, I never knew about it either, until I started digging back in 2001 (most, if not all the T83 were scrapped). The Airfix kit was advertised in RAF Flying Review as new back in 1961, a bit before Bloodhound 2 became operational. However Type 87 kit will happen if I win the big one on the Lottery (£8 mill plus), As well as a T86 (To keep Corkscrew happy) and a decent large scale BH 2 kit in plastic (Trumpeter, you have done an SA-2 and a SA-6, what about a Bloodhound 1 and 2). However, I would kill for the big 1-24 Scale Frog Bloodhound mark 1 kit (I would love to known what happen to the moulds for that one).
Just bought the re-issued Airfix Bristol Bloodhound kit from my local model shop. Nice to see the fantastic retro Roy Cross artwork, but it appears Airfix have gone in for retro instructions as well
The return of a Classic, however. The RAF never operated a Bloodhound Mark 1 Fire Unit like the Roy Cross painting, however the Aussies came close at Darwin with 30 Sqn’s RAAF Det ‘A’ see attachment.
The background blurb states: ‘The Bristol/Ferranti Bloodhound is the surface-to-air guided missile system selected by the R.A.F. for the defence of the United Kingdom and is now in service with Fighter Command’.
Perhaps they should have updated the text sometime between 1969 and now!
Like ‘until 1964 for this version.’
That said, it’s quite a nice kit and a welcome return. It includes not only the missile and launch stand but a series 2 Land Rover, ground crew, security detail and dog!
If the plastic is not white, it should be, no operational Mark 1’s were ever green. As for the Dog and Policemen, guess where Airfix got the idea for that addition (and the other poses of the other personnel). Some photos of the press day in 1958 at RAF North Coates which saw a Bloodhound Squadron shown to the world for the first time. Check out the British Pathe Web site for the movie that Airfix must have used as part of their research material.
BLOODHOUND MOVIES AT BRITISH PATHE
and select RAF GET BLOODHOUND MISSILES, you can get a free download previews (WMF file) with sound (the sound track is typical British 50’s Newsreel and in a lot of respects is complete BS (The drone that gets chopped is a Meteor by the way).
It’s not complete without a T86 (or preferably) T87 radar! With moving aerials!
Wrong guess, Papa Lima. Stingray (Type 83) radar for the Mark 1, Photo also attached. Plus if your putting the radar in you would have to have two, plus the Launch Control Post (a nice red wooden walled house type building if your in Sweden), a Work Services Building and another 15 missile kits (you will also have to scratch build a Launcher Plant Assembly to go next to the pad on every launcher pad). Just add the new MACH 2 Valiant and you have early 1960’s MARHAM! (got to scratch build the tractor as well). However if you are lazy, you can get away with 8 missiles on launchers if you build the main Swedish site at LV3 or the 30 Sqn RAAF Det at Darwin (only need one radar and a cabin mounted LCP fot the down under one).
Anybody remember the old Airfix Herc Kit had a Bloodhound in it when it first came out (before they stopped putting the bloodhound in and then hacked the moulds up to make an AC-130) Well Hercules did carry Bloodhound Mark 1, but not in RAF Markings, as another attachment shows.
Finally some different colour schemes, however again mostly white, 141 Sqn display round,. Swedish RB-365 and of course the RAAF one being wheeled out of the Herc (remove upper Boost motor fins first).
And finally,
Patriot in the 1980s was not a direct replacement for Bloodhound and lacked some performance as well as exceeding in other areas.
Bloodhound had a 360 degree azimuth coverage, Patriot something under 120 deg (I don’t know the actual figure) limited by the radar electronic scan. I believe this was seen as a big issue. Patriot was never cheap, especially if you cannot determine the threat direction, its volumetric coverage is less than a simple range comparisons imply. The radar cabin can be rotated to change the centre of the electronic scan coverage but historically this was almost closer to an installation feature than an operational feature to give continuous 360 degree coverage. Also with all electronic scan radars the aerial performance degrades as it scans far from bore sight, another embarrassing little issue. I seem to remember that the radar used moving target indication rather than full Doppler processing, its probably much more capable now but it was the late 1980’s that it was potentially a Bloodhound replacement. There were a few write ups of the system in the 80’s in Microwave Journal etc. Patriot has a long history and goes back to the mid 1960s as SAM –D etc.
So Patriot was superficially attractive but not cheap and quite a few limitations.
Spot on Corkscrew, unfortunately 😡 😡
Considering Patriot was probably the only thing on the table bar designing a completely new system it almost sounds like the standard was set too high to make it impossible to choose a replacement within the requirement thus saving the MOD a bag full of money.
That the problem with the RAF, they always want the world with a system, or not at all. TSR2, Eurofighter, Etc, Etc. Saying that Patriot was in essence a point defence weapon until PAC 3 was developed. The failure to buy Land Dart was because of money (or more accurately the total lack of it). However in both cases the RAF really wanted a SAM with the largest area coverage, outwards and upwards, that would somewhere near to Bloodhound, at least in horizontal coverage.
Melvyn, perhaps like me you are suffering from alcohol-induced insomnia!
Nope, Bank Holiday Lie-in. Big Mistake. Time for bed.
Crickey, that was quick! Maybe 60 seconds between posting and then realising I’d forgotten to add the attachment. Dohhhh!!!!
William
Never mind, don’t get to see much of the West German Gannets, Anybody got a photo of an Indonesian Gannet?
Have not got any photos that I can access quicky, so one of my Profiles will have to do. Gannet AEW3 of 849 NAS HQ Flight.
The late Sir Richard FAIREY must be spinning in his grave in reaction to the way you spell his name!
I would hate to be called a fairy too! (Even though while in the RAF I was closely related to that branch of electronics technicians)
Nothing wrong with being a FAIRY mate, Still got the sparks on my uniform, I’ve got to get up to Elvington sometime, I was going to visit there last time I was up that part of the world back in 2002, but my plans were scupped when Canopener Al had a little argument with a Tucano which landed him is hospital and I had to go and look after his kids.
Came across an interesting story while looking at air accidents around the Channel Islands, the loss of a C-130E, 63-7789, c.n. 3856, of the 36th Tactical Airlift Squadron at RAF Lakenheath after it had been borrowed by an apparently drunk Crew Chief, Paul Meyers. The aircraft came down in the Channel, close to Alderney, after flying around for about 1.30 hrs, rumour has it that he was heading for either the Azores or France. It’s possible that the aircraft crashed after Meyers had set the autopilot so he could be free to talk to his wife via a radio/telephone link.
I’ve found a reasonable amount about the incident on the intraweb, including theories that Meyer’s aircraft was shot down, possibly by the F100’s that were reputed to have been sent after him from Lakenheath or by the French Air Force.
Going back a few years, 20 odd I think, I recall a story told to me when I was a young ATC cadet about RAF fighters being scrambled to find and shoot down an errant US Air Force transport aircraft, basically because the US authorities didn’t want their crews tarnished with the stigma of killing their own. I dismissed the story as BS, however after reading the account of this incident of 23 May 1969 it maybe that there maybe some substance in the story told to me.
Why Meyers crashed has never been explained, and it seems that the US authorities have subsequently blocked the records from being released.
I wonder, if RAF aircraft were involved whether Squadron records would reflect the incident and whether these records are yet available.
Unless its been pulled or was not entered in the ORB, it should be listed in a Squadron ORB, everything to 1975 has been released by ABH and is now at the NA at Kew However the is a strong possibly that it will not be listed if it was true, as I’ve heard of a number of incidents from a number of people that have included dates through the years, that when I’ve checked the ORB of the unit in question, there was nothing listed about the incident.