The FIRST is INTERNAL, cooling the blades, the SECOND is cooling the engine internal CASTING exhausting in the afterburner channel, the THIRD is cooling this CASTING and the Afterburner casting, and just in case you didn’t notice there is another channel cooling the external skin of the engine which exhausts between the two sets of con-di nozzles.

I SHORT there are 3 engine casing on M88 vs 2 on EJ200.
http://www.onera.fr/coupdezoom/18-barrieres-thermiques.php

Posting pictures like these and asking such a question is not a very scientific way to do it.

Your blurred link show not your second Channel, it’s show your Fan-bybass!:rolleyes:
Nothing new, its all common.
And where use the M-88 Blisks? It’s used aged fishtail technic.

M88-2
Specific fuel consumption (dry) 80kg/kNh
Specific fuel consumption (with afterburner) 170kg/kNh

EJ200
Specific fuel consumption (dry) 21-23 g/kNs x 3.6 =75.6-82.8kg/kNh
Specific fuel consumption (with afterburner) 47-49 g/kNs x 3.6 = 169.2-176.4kg/kNh

Sukhoi was indeed not even invited.:rolleyes::diablo:

But the Typhoon supercruised not at sealevel!
It supercruised above 10000m, in Signapore!

he has already clarified that the charts are for engine to engine comparisons only in terms of their full powers.
1:1 doesn’t mean both have same power but both have their max possible power !
learn to read graphs please.

I can read graphs and I know that this is crape.:rolleyes:
Beyond 0.3 Mach occurrence compressibility.;)

http://forums.bharat-rakshak.com/viewtopic.php?f=3&p=532129#p532129

a BRF member wrote a code to compare the m-88 to the EJ.

He wrote therefore a catholic physics programm or for Hindus a hindu physics programm!
He must works with non linear gasdynamic equations!
Or how can you explains to that the Typhoon archieved supercruise in Signapore on a hot day and the Rafale failed to do this ?!

I think think again! How compatible is the Rafale layout with a future TVC system?:rolleyes:

You forget a little bit, the Boeing tanker bribery affair.:diablo:
The Backshish let the KC-767 also appear much more appropriate.:rolleyes:

USAF lease and cancellation

For its Commercial Derivative Air Refuelling Aircraft program, the U.S. Air Force decided to lease around 100 KC-767 tankers from Boeing after it won (bribed;)) the selection process.

Despite many other nations engaging in leased aircraft, there was some criticism. U.S. Senator John McCain questioned whether it is really cost-effective for the USAF to lease aircraft at all, particularly as the aircraft would probably not have many, if any, buyers when their military service was concluded.

In December 2003, the Pentagon announced the project was to be frozen while an investigation of allegations of corruption by one if its former procurement staffers, Darleen Druyun (who had moved to Boeing in January) was begun. Druyun pleaded guilty and was sentenced to nine months in jail for “negotiating a job with Boeing at the same time she was involved in contracts with the company”. Additional fallout included the resignation of Boeing CEO Philip M. Condit and the termination of CFO Michael M. Sears.