bungled reporting. I am pretty sure the source meant the seeker for AAD ABM system which is sourced from russia.
hmm, similar to the IAI-HAL NRUAV project, also based on a french origin machine, the HAL chetak, which is the license built alouette III.
however, recently they have shifted to the dhruv in stead of the chetak.
http://www.flightglobal.com/news/articles/iai-to-help-india-develop-unmanned-dhruv-351501/
an IAI ad about the original plan.
ewww. sengupta and his blabbering nonsense. why do you even bother with this stuff ?
he WAS awarded a medal, the VM or vayusena medal.
Jesus, where did the Shah get all the funding?
oil ?
Would love to se a source on THAT 😮
google iran contra affair.
Why does India need an ICBM?
same reason UK or france keeps a nuclear deterrent. something like “who knows if we might need it one day”. the memories of a certain 7th fleet in 1971 are still alive in the strategic quarters of delhi. moreover there is no way anyone can predict what path global politics would take tomorrow.
it won’t be a high priority but you can bet that the scientists would continue to improve range, counter measures and accuracy.
in an alternate Universe, the IN chose to use F-4s instead of Sea Harriers on the Vikrant!
Modeled by Spinner
would probably still pack a punch today!
nice but the white tiger should be leaping up, not down.
for example
are you saying Hu supports subsidizing equipment to the PAF ala US-Israel?
I don’t know, I am asking.
xxxxxxxxxx Clean up xxxxxxxxxx
Hu will pay for it ?
I hope this isn’t a stupid question, but is it possible for a small, short-range IR missile to shoot down another AAM such as the AIM-120?
R-73 archer advertised that capability if memory serves right.
vivek raghuvanshi. do not bother unless cheap fiction is your thing.
swerve what do you reckon are the chances for japan to change its export policy at least wrt non-aggressive mil items like transports ? given the increasing pressures on japanese economy.
Witcha, you will have many of your secondary wishes fulfilled by the end of this decade. it’s not all talk as is made out to be in the press. KMGT f/e is going full steam ahead, the navy guys have taken over GTRE campus per a friend of mine ! 😉
Witcha, GTRE existing for 60 years or kaveri for 30 years is meaningless rhetoric, the pertinent point being what mandate and more importantly, funds were they given by the govt. I am sure you know that the answer is ‘nothing’, they had a building and that’s about it.
anyway, you got the basic maths wrong as well, GTRE was established in 1959, that makes it nearer 50 than 60.
the official lifetime of the kaveri project is 25 years. while bungling at MOD level has played its part in slowing down the project, GTRE can’t move beyond the current level without a breakthrough in materials, which, as I have repeated umpteen times, falls outside its area of responsibility.
where does the Ka-50/52 place in your pecking order?
its probably worth throwing the WZ-10 and LCH in this.. both are closer to the Mangusta in size and probably role… both have too much exposed glass cockpits, especially with the LCH. But at least both are using single barrel guns which should reduce vibration.
only in the prototype, as confirmed by the test pilot over at BR forums.