external changes to production version will be barely visible according to Segey Bogdan interview at MAKS. My 5 kopeks for radar blockers installation, implementing RAM – that’s all. enough is enough. once more, T-50 is not ‘YF-22ski’ and was created from the beginning as EMD series F/A-22s
while Marchukov did tell of 2D nozzles, it’s a long way from talks to practice, and now I give less chance for them to appear on finalized version
Hmmm…. Pity.:(
Of course I’m no expert in these matters, but comparing the T-50’s shape with the Raptor and F-35 I feel more could be done in terms of stealth shaping, specifically the engines/nozzles and the underbody.
Any information on the T-50’s ‘final’ engine besides the fact that it’ll have square exhaust ducts? Will it be a further development of 117 or a new design from scratch? If the latter, what are the expected design parameters(like say, thrust)?
Not yet. But as part of the last round of cut-backs on the Netherlands military two of the ships will probably be put up for sale right after delivery. 🙁
I wonder if it’d be possible to just cut away and buy the I-masts with their sensors…:D
Agreed! Good relations now doesn’t mean things won’t change in the future, especially considering India and China will become ever more determined to obtain resources, and Australia has lots of natural resources.
So when are the invasions from Japan, Taiwan and the United Kingdom coming? Those poor cramped nations with their bursting populations and limited resources…;)
To think Australia is going for the F-35, a plane made by (gasp) another future invader, the USA.:D
I think it was TR1 who reported that it is actually a new variant for land-based use as a battlefield surveillance radar. There is a precedent – France developed a Puma version for the same task (the designation escapes me though).
Interesting. Could you please link me to some details, TR1? I guess this is Russia’s long-delayed answer to JSTARS?
welcome to the real world WITCHA, in which not everyone wants to hug and kiss and make nice…. fact of the matter is, Australia does have a threat in India and China… even Indonesia. Accept it. as we continue to overpopulate this world, and resources and space become more scarce, countries finances become worse and worse…. if a country runs out of money, doesnt mean it no longer needs to buy things… and if said country has a large military… things can/ and have happened…
and those aircraft would make a world of difference… in any defence of the country, it will not be sheer numbers that win the day…. training, determination and skill and quality of equipment will matter… as will tactics, and geography… we have alot of distance to trade for time…enough time for allies to come and assist….
Please. In the ‘real world’ the idea of India or China crossing the ocean to launch a full-scale invasion and occupation against another continent is the stuff of Tom Clancy novels and nothing more. :rolleyes:
Fact is Australia has no real enemies and so many defence enthusiasts have to look for less concrete reasons(besides participating in US/NATO conflicts) for it to have a cutting-edge military. By your scenario above every country in the world including its ‘allies’ would want to invade it for its resources. BTW, by that measure wouldn’t Australia also want to invade India for its abundant coal, iron ore and Thorium, among others?:D
No offence, but you’re either too paranoid or you read a lot of that stuff. India’s unlikely to even invide Bhutan, Sri Lanka, Myanmar or Nepal just for the sake of easing its population, let alone Australia. Only Carlo Kopp would think otherwise.:D
why would Australia invest in any military program with a potential future enemy? The best option was F-22, second best F-35. we’re getting F-35, thats it
Australia would be better served by doubling the Super Hornet, KC-30 and C-17 acquisitions, scrapping MRH-90s and buying more CH-47Fs and buy new/ upgrade S-70As….with some dedicated pave hawks for 171 sqn…
Er, since when was India a ‘potential future enemy’ for Australia?:confused:
Or are you referring to Carlo Kopp’s wild theories?:rolleyes:
Interesting, it seems to be carrying a full defensive sensor suite and DIRCM!
Is that one of the Russian Navy’s Ka-31 prototypes or the export version headed for China?
There won’t be any more 11356s for Russian navy after the 6, that is almost certain.
Dunno. If for some reason they 22350s get delayed…
From Twower:
“520nd Independent Rocket-Artillery Coastal Brigade made 3 launches today.”
4K51 Rubezh
Redut
EDIT:
And footage of the event.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WEwpoVGaTUE&feature=player_embedded#!
Rubezh and Redut? Are they launch complexes using the Uran/Moskit/Yakhont or new ASMs?
What is the cargo capacity of the An-140? I take it it falls in the same range as the cancelled IL-112V it’s replacing?
In that case, why did the RuAF go for a new cargo conversion of a civilian airliner rather than the well-established An-72/74 military transport?:confused:
http://www.antonov.com/products/air/special/AN-74mp/index.xml
Bad joke.
The original one
I wondered why a UAV had what looked like a cockpit…;)
Those 3,750-shp Klimov TV7-117V powerplants are amazing!!
Impressive specs.
I’m curious why they didn’t use the VK-2500(from the Mi-17V7) instead. That’s all in all a superior engine.
I have a guess that you need to look at these photos once more.
and compare to this
I stand correted. My post was based on a write-up I read long ago on some or the other defence blog; I hadn’t myself seen any pics that showed the compressor face.
Is NPO Saturn considering technologies like ceramic/composite turbine blades to lower radar reflection?
—
And on a different note, what happened to Klimov’s old proposal for a 14-ton class engine?
anyone who tells you why radar blockers vs duct shaping gives you better/worse RCS is just pulling your pants down. no one in this forum knows for sure.. well maybe DJCross and LMraptor.. we can guess at best.
and I doubt Pak-fa will get S-ducts unless Sukhoi is willing to change nearly half the body. it’ll probably get some kind of blocker, and maybe a different rear nozzle..
but hey, the X-32 had a straight through intake and blockers.. and its loss to the x-35 had to do with its method of vertical take off and changes in the production version and nothing about its stealth.. so there must not be too bad.
IIRC the X-32 had a rather complex system of inlet blockers in place. Also it had a belly duct like the F-16 and not Flanker-type straight rectangular ducts leading straight to the engine face.
There is potential for integrating a radar blocker directly with the square engines that the PAK-FA would eventually be fitted out with… who knows?